On 01/30/15 22:01, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
30.01.2015 17:53, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
There are template envelopes at both sides.
BTW, I think that this header should be split into two. It can speed up
compilation.
It can be split, but is speed of compilation really a problem?
02.02.2015 12:00, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
So split the files manually and report the time differences.
I see two times speed up for a module that uses Interfaces.h. 14k lines is a
big bunch
of
--
WBR, SD.
Any other comments?
On 31 January 2015 at 22:30, Egor Pugin egor.pu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
build_msg -D msg.fdb -P ./ -F firebird.msg -L all
when msg.fdb is absent will result in infinite loop.
I have the simple fix - try to open specified file, but maybe someone
has better solution.
Yes, build_file.epp/build_file.cpp of course. Sorry.
On 2 February 2015 at 16:45, Dimitry Sibiryakov s...@ibphoenix.com wrote:
02.02.2015 13:44, Egor Pugin wrote:
Any other comments?
There is no build_msg.cpp file. If you have on mind build_file.cpp, then
it just has a
check for connect
Possible deadlock in firebird connect.
--
Key: CORE-4680
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4680
Project: Firebird Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Engine
Affects Versions: 3.0
02.02.2015 13:44, Egor Pugin wrote:
Any other comments?
There is no build_msg.cpp file. If you have on mind build_file.cpp, then it
just has a
check for connect errors missed. Perhaps, it should be preprocessed with
different gpre
settings.
--
WBR, SD.
02.02.2015 12:28, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
If it really helps you to build during 45 min instead 1.5 hours change
does make sense.
But what*HUGE* solution do you build?
Firebird3
Somewhy I think you are not using computer on 486 CPU:)
No, it is quite modern AMD A4-1250 1GHz. CPU is
On 02/02/15 14:35, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
02.02.2015 12:28, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
If it really helps you to build during 45 min instead 1.5 hours change
does make sense.
But what*HUGE* solution do you build?
Firebird3
Somewhy I think you are not using computer on 486 CPU:)
02.02.2015 12:58, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
PS. Certainly I agree that for such builds splitting file makes sense,
but I wanted to explain my initial POV.
From any POV a header file which have 10k lines that aren't used is a mess.
99% of
modules is using interfaces, not implementing them, so
On 01/30/15 21:33, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
30.01.2015 18:59, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
It's not complete, for example, for Pascal.
I.e. you have no idea how to transform you IDL to Pascal code, have you?..
As far as I can see simple examples are transformed to Pascal
02.02.2015 11:48, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
It can be split, but is speed of compilation really a problem?
At my computer full build of solution takes about an hour and a half. Yes,
this is a
problem, especially because MSVC doesn't stop compilation after errors.
--
WBR, SD.
On 02/02/2015 08:53, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
02.02.2015 11:48, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
It can be split, but is speed of compilation really a problem?
At my computer full build of solution takes about an hour and a half. Yes,
this is a
problem, especially because MSVC doesn't stop
On 02/02/15 14:04, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
02.02.2015 12:00, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
So split the files manually and report the time differences.
I see two times speed up for a module that uses Interfaces.h. 14k lines
is a big bunch
of
If it really helps you to build
On 02/02/2015 09:28, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
On 02/02/15 14:04, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
02.02.2015 12:00, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
So split the files manually and report the time differences.
I see two times speed up for a module that uses Interfaces.h. 14k lines
is a big bunch
14 matches
Mail list logo
