Create Database on Windows XP
-
Key: CORE-4886
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4886
Project: Firebird Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: ISQL
Affects Versions: 3.0 Beta 2
On 7/26/2015 2:38 PM, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
On 07/26/2015 01:39 PM, James Starkey wrote:
If you were starting over from scratch, you wouldn't want to use SHA-1 to
avoid wasting time with discussions like this. See also RC4. But the
problem with SHA-1 doesn't justify the inconvenience of
On 25-7-2015 15:08, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
25.07.2015 15:45, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
How would I go about that if none of the errors in that facility are
defined inside Firebird,
We could define and reserve facility code for Jaybird and let you know it.
That would be great.
and how can
26.07.2015 12:08, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 25-7-2015 15:08, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
25.07.2015 15:45, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
How would I go about that if none of the errors in that facility are
defined inside Firebird,
We could define and reserve facility code for Jaybird and let you
Personally, I've recently started using (mostly for kicks) things like
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrypt
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bcrypt
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PBKDF2
I suppose the option to tune them in the future (or even introduce a
configurable
parameter) is also a
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Vlad Khorsun hv...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote:
Or is there a reason to ignore those higher bits for the facility and
code?
I have no idea why ENCODE_ISC_MSG written in this way.
CLASS_MASK seems to not be used anywhere, or at least I can't remember
