On 21/11/17 18:31, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> On 2017-11-21 18:31, Lester Caine wrote:
>> On 21/11/17 16:42, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>>>
>>> If you need that, you also need to store the actual timezone somewhere.
>>> PostgreSQL for example also uses an offset for timestamp with timezone
>>> (not sure
On 2017-11-21 18:31, Lester Caine wrote:
On 21/11/17 16:42, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
If you need that, you also need to store the actual timezone
somewhere.
PostgreSQL for example also uses an offset for timestamp with timezone
(not sure if that is required by SQL standard though).
Firebird
21.11.2017 19:45, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
If CURRENT_TIMEZONE returns TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE, it will be
described with the new datatype and will broke all applications that
rely on isc_dsql_describe.
True. I was thinking about "static" applications, sorry.
Then the
On 2017-11-21 17:49, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 21/11/2017 14:16, Lester Caine wrote:
On 21/11/17 14:55, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Implementing TIME WITH TIME ZONE and TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE
datatypes
as specified in the SQL standard is not a big problem.
The only
On 2017-11-21 17:52, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 21/11/2017 14:42, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
If you need that, you also need to store the actual timezone
somewhere. PostgreSQL for example also uses an offset for timestamp
with timezone (not sure if that is required by SQL standard
On 21/11/17 16:42, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>
> If you need that, you also need to store the actual timezone somewhere.
> PostgreSQL for example also uses an offset for timestamp with timezone
> (not sure if that is required by SQL standard though).
Firebird currently works nicely simply because
On 21/11/2017 14:42, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>
> If you need that, you also need to store the actual timezone
> somewhere. PostgreSQL for example also uses an offset for timestamp
> with timezone (not sure if that is required by SQL standard though).
>
Each "TIMESTAMP-TZ" has a hour/minute offset
On 21/11/2017 14:16, Lester Caine wrote:
> On 21/11/17 14:55, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>> Implementing TIME WITH TIME ZONE and TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE datatypes
>> as specified in the SQL standard is not a big problem.
> The only question is just how is the timezone data managed. It is
On 21/11/2017 13:56, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> 21.11.2017 17:55, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>>
>> Implementing TIME WITH TIME ZONE and TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE datatypes
>> as specified in the SQL standard is not a big problem.
>>
>> However, standard says that CURRENT_TIME /
On 2017-11-21 16:56, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
21.11.2017 17:55, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Implementing TIME WITH TIME ZONE and TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE
datatypes
as specified in the SQL standard is not a big problem.
However, standard says that CURRENT_TIME / CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
On 2017-11-21 17:16, Lester Caine wrote:
On 21/11/17 14:55, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Implementing TIME WITH TIME ZONE and TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE
datatypes
as specified in the SQL standard is not a big problem.
The only question is just how is the timezone data managed. It is
On 21/11/17 14:55, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> Implementing TIME WITH TIME ZONE and TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE datatypes
> as specified in the SQL standard is not a big problem.
The only question is just how is the timezone data managed. It is
useless simply having an offset value when
21.11.2017 18:56, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
So only conversion to string seems to be a real problem. And IMHO we
could live with that.
And given that we speak about PSQL (accessible for modifications),
people may replace CURRENT_TIME with LOCALTIME to preserve the string
conversion results, if
21.11.2017 17:55, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Implementing TIME WITH TIME ZONE and TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE datatypes
as specified in the SQL standard is not a big problem.
However, standard says that CURRENT_TIME / CURRENT_TIMESTAMP returns the
timed-zone datatype.
That causes two
On 2017-11-21 15:55, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Hi!
Implementing TIME WITH TIME ZONE and TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE datatypes
as specified in the SQL standard is not a big problem.
However, standard says that CURRENT_TIME / CURRENT_TIMESTAMP returns
the
timed-zone datatype.
That
Hi!
Implementing TIME WITH TIME ZONE and TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE datatypes
as specified in the SQL standard is not a big problem.
However, standard says that CURRENT_TIME / CURRENT_TIMESTAMP returns the
timed-zone datatype.
That causes two problems:
- Internally (say in PSQL), conversion to
This same problem is also present in version 2.5.7
I just checked
Best Regards
--
Ismael
- Original Message -
From: "Artyom Smirnov (JIRA)"
To:
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2017 8:19 AM
Subject: [Firebird-devel]
17 matches
Mail list logo