Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote 25.08.2022 10:27:
But here are some problems:
- An error when querying service is treated by 99% of callers (starting with
fbsvcmgr) as fatal one. Other errors will not be displayed.
And it is the right way to handle them, IMHO.
- What about warnings
> As the Intel platforms will be the *huge* majority, what about this:
>
> win32 | win64 |win64-arm
>
> or this:
>
> win32-x86 | win64-x86 | win64-arm
>
> or just:
>
> win32 | win64-x86 | win64-arm
That seems pretty inconsistent (in regards to other filenames).
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
On 25-08-2022 15:13, Stefan Heymann wrote:
I propose this name convention starting with Firebird 5:
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86-pdb.exe
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86-pdb.zip
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86.exe
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86.zip
>> > I'd like to suggest you use win32 and win64 instead of x86 and x64. Or, it
>> > you want to keep the "windows" prefix, use window-32 and windows-64.
>> > For me as a Windows user this would be much more logical (the 86 comes
>> > from the 80*86 processor, the 64 comes from 64 bits, so
> In the past win32 and win64 was good but now Windows exists for ARM64.
> x86, x(86-)64, arm64, etc. are more clear. But I am not a core developer
> just a user. :-)
Same for me.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
2022.08.25. 15:13 keltezéssel, Stefan Heymann írta:
I'd like to suggest you use win32 and win64 instead of x86 and x64. Or, it you want to
keep the "windows" prefix, use window-32 and windows-64.
For me as a Windows user this would be much more logical (the 86 comes from the
80*86 processor,
> I propose this name convention starting with Firebird 5:
> Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86-pdb.exe
> Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86-pdb.zip
> Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86.exe
> Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86.zip
> Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x64-pdb.exe
>
On 25-08-2022 12:38, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
Dmitry Yemanov wrote 25.08.2022 12:34:
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86-withDebugSymbols.exe
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86-withDebugSymbols.zip
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86.exe
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86.zip
On 25/08/2022 07:38, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>
> Is this zero after build number necessary?
>
It's packaging number.
We had this type of problem in Windows build in the past, where retag
was not necessary and the package number was increased.
Adriano
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web
On 25/08/2022 07:19, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> On 25-08-2022 03:15, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>> On 24/08/2022 08:45, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>>>
>>> I propose this name convention starting with Firebird 5:
>>>
>>
>> Here is my updated proposal based on the discussion so far:
Dmitry Yemanov wrote 25.08.2022 12:34:
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86-withDebugSymbols.exe
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86-withDebugSymbols.zip
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86.exe
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86.zip
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x64-withDebugSymbols.exe
25.08.2022 04:15, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Here is my updated proposal based on the discussion so far:
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86-withDebugSymbols.exe
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86-withDebugSymbols.zip
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86.exe
On 25-08-2022 03:15, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 24/08/2022 08:45, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
I propose this name convention starting with Firebird 5:
Here is my updated proposal based on the discussion so far:
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86-withDebugSymbols.exe
On 8/24/22 20:59, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
Alexander Peshkov wrote 24.08.2022 19:06:
On 8/24/22 14:31, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> Without it services seem to be pretty useless.
I think this to be suggested in devel and if nobody sees problems - feel
free to add a ticket, I will implement
14 matches
Mail list logo
