11.08.2014 10:38, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> Next, COM means UTF16 (at least on windows). Do we want to change our
> favorite UTF8 to UTF16 on every call? We decided that we do not.
>
> And last issue. IUnknown alone is far not a full COM, at least
> automation is needed. I do not know an easy way to h
On 08/09/14 01:30, Jim Starkey wrote:
> Isn't COM a natural technology for plugins? Load a module, lookup the query
> interface interface, then probe for known interfaces. If one is found, it
> identifies both the formal interface and, by implication, the type of plugin.
>
> By definition, COM
09.08.2014 19:29, marius adrian popa wrote:
> I vote with Jim on this , if we reinvent com at least we can use it as
> it should , I would use xpcom from mozilla
Mozilla? That slow and hungry-for-RAM browser?.. I would be very sceptical
about
anything from them.
--
WBR, SD.
I vote with Jim on this , if we reinvent com at least we can use it as
it should , I would use xpcom from mozilla
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Tech/XPCOM
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Jim Starkey wrote:
> Isn't COM a natural technology for plugins? Load a module, lookup th
Isn't COM a natural technology for plugins? Load a module, lookup the query
interface interface, then probe for known interfaces. If one is found, it
identifies both the formal interface and, by implication, the type of plugin.
By definition, COM interfaces are immutable, so there is not quest
