On Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:28:40 +0100, Dimitry Sibiryakov s...@ibphoenix.com
wrote:
28.03.2014 16:23, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
The only problem would be old server accessed with new client and
message file.
Exactly because of this old messages must not be changed this way,
new
28.03.2014 19:23, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
The only problem would be old server accessed with new client and
message file.
It will show:
validation error for column Missing arg #3 - possibly status vector
overflow.NAME, value ...'
IIRC, the overflow protection (missing arg N)
28.03.2014 19:23, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
But AFAIK, value @2 is also new, which also causes problem, so I don't
think this is a showstopper.
Nope, value @2 is there for at least a decade. I see it in the v2.0
sources.
Dmitry
On 28/03/2014 12:28, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
28.03.2014 16:23, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
The only problem would be old server accessed with new client and
message file.
Exactly because of this old messages must not be changed this way, new
messages must be
added instead.
On 21/03/2014 06:00, Pavel Zotov (JIRA) wrote:
Provide name of TABLE / VIEW when some statement violates CHECK.
Key: CORE-4368
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4368
27.03.2014 19:46, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Do you think it's ok to output validation error for column TABLE.ID?
Just for the record, I was thinking the same line.
Dmitry
--
Firebird-Devel mailing list,
