14.11.2016 21:26, Thomas Steinmaurer пишет:
>>
>>> But still, IMHO it does not explain why additional connect request with
>>> SS while running OLTP emul with 100 users are taking considerable time,
>>> although they are almost instant with SC?
>>
>>This is not SS vs SC. This is absence vs
> 14.11.2016 21:00, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
>
>> But still, IMHO it does not explain why additional connect request with
>> SS while running OLTP emul with 100 users are taking considerable time,
>> although they are almost instant with SC?
>
>This is not SS vs SC. This is absence vs
14.11.2016 21:00, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
> But still, IMHO it does not explain why additional connect request with
> SS while running OLTP emul with 100 users are taking considerable time,
> although they are almost instant with SC?
This is not SS vs SC. This is absence vs presence of
Hi Vlad,
> 14.11.2016 20:27, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
> ...
>> So, with 16G RAM and an OLTP emul database with ~ 2,9G, it is still
>> recommended with Firebird 3 SS and the shared page cache, to rather use
>> a smaller number, lets say 50K and keep the FileSystemCacheThreshold at
>> 64K to have
14.11.2016 20:27, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
...
> So, with 16G RAM and an OLTP emul database with ~ 2,9G, it is still
> recommended with Firebird 3 SS and the shared page cache, to rather use
> a smaller number, lets say 50K and keep the FileSystemCacheThreshold at
> 64K to have the file system
Hello Vlad,
> 14.11.2016 16:09, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
>> Hello Simon,
>>
>>> Thomas Steinmaurer wrote Mon, 14 Nov 2016 15:03:41
>>> +0300:
>>>
Hello,
using Firebird-3.0.1.32609-0_x64_pdb.zip SuperServer on Windows 10 Prof.
with 16G RAM, spinning
14.11.2016 16:09, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
> Hello Simon,
>
>> Thomas Steinmaurer wrote Mon, 14 Nov 2016 15:03:41
>> +0300:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> using Firebird-3.0.1.32609-0_x64_pdb.zip SuperServer on Windows 10 Prof.
>>> with 16G RAM, spinning disk (7200K) and Xeon 1230
Hello Simon,
> Thomas Steinmaurer wrote Mon, 14 Nov 2016 15:03:41
> +0300:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> using Firebird-3.0.1.32609-0_x64_pdb.zip SuperServer on Windows 10 Prof.
>> with 16G RAM, spinning disk (7200K) and Xeon 1230 CPU (4 physical cores)
>>
>> Performance related
Thomas Steinmaurer wrote Mon, 14 Nov 2016 15:03:41
+0300:
> Hello,
>
> using Firebird-3.0.1.32609-0_x64_pdb.zip SuperServer on Windows 10 Prof.
> with 16G RAM, spinning disk (7200K) and Xeon 1230 CPU (4 physical cores)
>
> Performance related changes in firebird.conf
Hi,
> Hi,
>
>> using Firebird-3.0.1.32609-0_x64_pdb.zip SuperServer on Windows 10 Prof.
>> with 16G RAM, spinning disk (7200K) and Xeon 1230 CPU (4 physical cores)
>>
>> Performance related changes in firebird.conf are:
>>
>> DB Page Size = 8K
>> DefaultDbCachePages = 128K (DB specific page
Hi,
> using Firebird-3.0.1.32609-0_x64_pdb.zip SuperServer on Windows 10 Prof.
> with 16G RAM, spinning disk (7200K) and Xeon 1230 CPU (4 physical cores)
>
> Performance related changes in firebird.conf are:
>
> DB Page Size = 8K
> DefaultDbCachePages = 128K (DB specific page buffers = 0)
>
Hello,
using Firebird-3.0.1.32609-0_x64_pdb.zip SuperServer on Windows 10 Prof.
with 16G RAM, spinning disk (7200K) and Xeon 1230 CPU (4 physical cores)
Performance related changes in firebird.conf are:
DB Page Size = 8K
DefaultDbCachePages = 128K (DB specific page buffers = 0)
TempCacheLimit
12 matches
Mail list logo