24.11.2013 23:21, Mark Rotteveel wrote: > I assume that is an artifact of the implementation, could you point me > to some code that shows this. If I look at the (wire!) protocol itself, > there is no such limitation to the total message length when sending > parameters (eg in op_execute2), although there is a limitation per > parameter.
True, this is more about implementation. The point is that it's worthless to fix without changing API as well. It's already done in FB3 but older fbclients are not prepared to handle this properly anyway. You may look at my commit that allowed longish strings in the remote code: http://markmail.org/message/u76dm74mexx3ua6v Dmitry ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation. Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
