On 20-01-2014 12:40, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
On 01/17/14 19:33, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
17.01.2014 19:16, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
I think IUtl::version
Being there, please rename it to getVersion(). As usual, I'm strongly
against nouns used as routine names.
Done.
There is a
On 01/27/14 05:07, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 20-01-2014 12:40, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
On 01/17/14 19:33, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
17.01.2014 19:16, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
I think IUtl::version
Being there, please rename it to getVersion(). As usual, I'm strongly
against
On 01/17/14 19:33, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
17.01.2014 19:16, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
I think IUtl::version
Being there, please rename it to getVersion(). As usual, I'm strongly
against nouns used as routine names.
Done.
Also I think IUtl::edit should not exist. It's a too
Alex and All,
I think some functions should not be added to new interfaces just to
replicate old ones.
I think IUtl::version should not call a IVersionCallback. IMO it should
receive a buffer and length and write to it or return how many bytes are
required for the buffer. Not very handy, but
17.01.2014 19:16, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
I think IUtl::version
Being there, please rename it to getVersion(). As usual, I'm strongly
against nouns used as routine names.
Also I think IUtl::edit should not exist. It's a too specialized ISQL
feature, and IMO should be there in
