Re: [Firebird-devel] Replacing `instsvc`

2015-09-17 Thread Stefan Heymann
> reading Paul's "instsvc and ServerMode" got me thinking whether we even > need the `instsvc` executable? The installer can install the services > directly and for batch files we can use PowerShell and the New-Service > etc. cmdlets. This will save some kB from the package. And also it will >

Re: [Firebird-devel] Replacing `instsvc`

2015-09-17 Thread Leyne, Sean
> > reading Paul's "instsvc and ServerMode" got me thinking whether we > > even need the `instsvc` executable? The installer can install the > > services directly and for batch files we can use PowerShell and the > > New-Service etc. cmdlets. This will save some kB from the package. And > > also

[Firebird-devel] Replacing `instsvc`

2015-09-17 Thread Jiří Činčura
Hi *, reading Paul's "instsvc and ServerMode" got me thinking whether we even need the `instsvc` executable? The installer can install the services directly and for batch files we can use PowerShell and the New-Service etc. cmdlets. This will save some kB from the package. And also it will remove

Re: [Firebird-devel] Replacing `instsvc`

2015-09-17 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
17.09.2015 16:23, Paul Reeves wrote: > The installer calls instsvc and instsvc includes all the code we need to > un/install services. And instsvc is only 250Kb. So I don't see a big win in > terms of reducing the size of the installation package. And personally, I use > instsvc.exe a lot on

Re: [Firebird-devel] Replacing `instsvc`

2015-09-17 Thread Paul Reeves
On Thursday 17 September 2015 16:03:09 Jiří Činčura wrote: > Hi *, > > reading Paul's "instsvc and ServerMode" got me thinking whether we even > need the `instsvc` executable? The installer can install the services > directly and for batch files we can use PowerShell and the New-Service > etc.

Re: [Firebird-devel] Replacing `instsvc`

2015-09-17 Thread Stefan Heymann
>> I use instsvc a lot. It is simple, small and does the job. Why drop >> it and replace it with something that's probably more complicated >> to use? > > What do you use it for? On my development machine I have several different versions of Firebird (2.1, 2.5, 3.0 when I find the time to test it

Re: [Firebird-devel] Replacing `instsvc`

2015-09-17 Thread Jiří Činčura
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015, at 16:23, Paul Reeves wrote: > The installer calls instsvc and instsvc includes all the code we need to > un/install services. And instsvc is only 250Kb. So I don't see a big win > in > terms of reducing the size of the installation package. And personally, I > use >

Re: [Firebird-devel] Replacing `instsvc`

2015-09-17 Thread Jiří Činčura
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015, at 18:33, Stefan Heymann wrote: > instsvc is very helpful to install, uninstall, start and stop the > various services for software tests. So is `sc` or Xxx-Service cmdlets. As a benefit you can use the same commands no matter what you're managing. > On customer machines