I've rolled back the feature after Pavel Zotov noted to not working
(with remote protocol).
Unfortunately I've only tested this with embedded but prepare flags are
passed as info codes to engine and that seems incompatible with the feature.
I want this feature to work with v4 too and don't want
On 16/07/2021 09:38, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
> 16.07.2021 15:22, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>> 16.07.2021 14:19, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>>> Instead of isc_info_sql_blr_bytes/isc_info_sql_blr_text, we can add
>>> single top level info code with sub code for raw/blr / dsql/jrd parse
>>>
16.07.2021 15:22, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
16.07.2021 14:19, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Instead of isc_info_sql_blr_bytes/isc_info_sql_blr_text, we can add
single top level info code with sub code for raw/blr / dsql/jrd parse trees.
Info request cannot have subcodes, it'll break
16.07.2021 14:19, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Instead of isc_info_sql_blr_bytes/isc_info_sql_blr_text, we can add
single top level info code with sub code for raw/blr / dsql/jrd parse trees.
Info request cannot have subcodes, it'll break its design.
--
WBR, SD.
Firebird-Devel
On 16/07/2021 06:25, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
> 15.07.2021 22:34, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Currently it's possible to set TraceDSQL config parameter in dev build
>> to have formatted statement BLR in firebird.log, but that is not
>> sufficient for automated tests.
>>
>> I want
On 16/07/2021 05:50, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
> On 7/15/21 10:56 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>> 15.07.2021 21:34, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>>> Comments?
>>
>> I see no point in the new interface.
>
> Not new iface, just extension of old one.
>
Just a new const as
16.07.2021 13:03, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
16.07.2021 11:52, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
We need a way to know when application uses BLR API directly.
Direct BLR compilation won't have DSQL prepare event with the same statement
ID. Isn't it enough for this topic's purpose?..
There are
16.07.2021 11:52, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
We need a way to know when application uses BLR API directly.
Direct BLR compilation won't have DSQL prepare event with the same statement ID. Isn't
it enough for this topic's purpose?..
I.e. trace_blr_compile is very different from
16.07.2021 12:26, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
16.07.2021 11:21, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
Second, we need separate trace event to show generated BLR.
Isn't trace_blr_compile enough?
We need a way to know when application uses BLR API directly.
I.e. trace_blr_compile is very different from
16.07.2021 11:21, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
Second, we need separate trace event to show generated BLR.
Isn't trace_blr_compile enough?
--
WBR, SD.
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
15.07.2021 22:34, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Hi!
Currently it's possible to set TraceDSQL config parameter in dev build
to have formatted statement BLR in firebird.log, but that is not
sufficient for automated tests.
I want to add facility to make it possible to applications request
16.07.2021 11:21, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
First, existing BLR-related trace events are not unused.
Right, I mixed them up with DYN events.
--
WBR, SD.
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
15.07.2021 22:56, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
15.07.2021 21:34, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Comments?
...
It would be simpler to raise trace BLR event from SQL prepare and let anyone interested to
watch generated BLR using existing (currently unused) trace parameter.
First,
16.07.2021 10:50, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
The only problem is that longterm we have plan to remove BLR support at all
If I'm not mistaken, these were plans to remove BLR as an intermediate language from
DSQL, not "at all". BLR was going still to be a part of Message API for
On 7/15/21 10:56 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
15.07.2021 21:34, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Comments?
I see no point in the new interface.
Not new iface, just extension of old one.
It would be simpler to raise trace BLR event from SQL prepare and let
anyone interested to watch
15.07.2021 21:34, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Comments?
I see no point in the new interface. It would be simpler to raise trace BLR event from
SQL prepare and let anyone interested to watch generated BLR using existing (currently
unused) trace parameter.
--
WBR, SD.
Hi!
Currently it's possible to set TraceDSQL config parameter in dev build
to have formatted statement BLR in firebird.log, but that is not
sufficient for automated tests.
I want to add facility to make it possible to applications request
individual statements BLR for debug and test purposes
17 matches
Mail list logo
