> So, I don't see what should be added to the README.parallel_features
> regarding gbak. Do you have good idea ?
A simple pointer to doc/README.gbak. Just to make sure people reading about the
parallel features in engine don't miss the gbak too.
Something like "Parallel backups and restores are
12.08.2022 14:25, Jiří Činčura WROTE:
Is there any prospect for more parallel operations in near future?
Especially around i.e. query processing, basically general database
operations. The reason I'm asking is whether to implement it in .NET
provider on connection string level or only for "gbak"
08.08.2022 9:57, Jiří Činčura wrote:
Is there any prospect for more parallel operations in near future? Especially around i.e. query
processing, basically general database operations. The reason I'm asking is whether to implement it
in .NET provider on connection string level or only for
> Is there any prospect for more parallel operations in near future?
> Especially around i.e. query processing, basically general database
> operations. The reason I'm asking is whether to implement it in .NET
> provider on connection string level or only for "gbak" and "gfix".
Disregard this
Is there any prospect for more parallel operations in near future? Especially
around i.e. query processing, basically general database operations. The reason
I'm asking is whether to implement it in .NET provider on connection string
level or only for "gbak" and "gfix".
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
04.08.2022 15:58, Jiří Činčura wrote:
Hi *,
What's the status of isc_dpb_parallel_workers? The only reference I can find is
the slide deck from 2019 from Firebird Conference. But I can't find anything in
code. Was this implemented? Dropped? Renamed? Postponed?
It is implemented in
Hi *,
What's the status of isc_dpb_parallel_workers? The only reference I can find is
the slide deck from 2019 from Firebird Conference. But I can't find anything in
code. Was this implemented? Dropped? Renamed? Postponed?
Thanks.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/
