> > Maybe is worth to be implemented in Firebird also
> >
> > http://blogs.technet.com/b/wincat/archive/2012/12/05/fast-tcp-loopback-
> performance-and-low-latency-with-windows-server-2012-tcp-loopback-fast-
> path.aspx
>
>Add to tracker, please.
Case 4563 created to implement Fast Path
26.09.2014 13:27, marius adrian popa :
> I have seen this patch for openjdk
>
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-September/008685.html
>
> Maybe is worth to be implemented in Firebird also
>
> http://blogs.technet.com/b/wincat/archive/2012/12/05/fast-tcp-loopback-performance-and
> > If v3 has the SMP improvements which are planned, why would we
> continue to support 3 engine versions?
> >
> > Classic and SuperClassic would have functionality which covers all use
> > cases.
>
> v3 has the SMP improvements in *SuperServer*.
Ok
FYI, the 2.5.x release notes suggest that
On 26-9-2014 18:11, Leyne, Sean wrote:
>> XNET is not an option for Jaybird or .NET users.
>
> Wasn't aware of that.
Well, actually it is possible with Jaybird (and probably with the .NET
provider as well), but most Java developers prefer not to use native
library dependencies.
>>> since the lo
26.09.2014 20:11, Leyne, Sean wrote:
>
> If v3 has the SMP improvements which are planned, why would we continue to
> support 3 engine versions?
>
> Classic and SuperClassic would have functionality which covers all use cases.
v3 has the SMP improvements in *SuperServer*.
Dmitry
> XNET is not an option for Jaybird or .NET users.
Wasn't aware of that.
> > since the long-term path for Firebird is the deprecation of
> > SuperServer
>
> You're surely misinformed.
If v3 has the SMP improvements which are planned, why would we continue to
support 3 engine versions?
Class
26.09.2014 19:13, Leyne, Sean wrote:
>
> Localhost is not necessary for Classic and SuperClassic engine (I not sure of
> SuperServer, we don't use this mode), since local mode connections are
> supported
XNET is not an option for Jaybird or .NET users.
> since the long-term path for Firebird is
Marius,
> Maybe is worth to be implemented in Firebird also
>
> http://blogs.technet.com/b/wincat/archive/2012/12/05/fast-tcp-loopback-
> performance-and-low-latency-with-windows-server-2012-tcp-loopback-fast-
> path.aspx
Localhost is not necessary for Classic and SuperClassic engine (I not sur
I have seen this patch for openjdk
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2014-September/008685.html
Maybe is worth to be implemented in Firebird also
http://blogs.technet.com/b/wincat/archive/2012/12/05/fast-tcp-loopback-performance-and-low-latency-with-windows-server-2012-tcp-loopback
