Re: [Firebird-devel] Wire protocol changes in Firebird 4?

2016-12-30 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
30.12.2016 15:52, Kovalenko Dmitry wrote: > No. It need for resolve a problem with cancelation of operations. > > http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-5152 I'm sorry, but could you explain a little: how packet length can help in this case? > It will allow with minimal efforts detect

Re: [Firebird-devel] Wire protocol changes in Firebird 4?

2016-12-30 Thread Kovalenko Dmitry
>4) Knowledge of total length of packet is required only for current parser which need full packet to be in single buffer. If rewrite parser to use stateful automate, total length is needless. No. It need for resolve a problem with cancelation of operations.

Re: [Firebird-devel] Wire protocol changes in Firebird 4?

2016-12-30 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
30.12.2016 12:19, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > 1) Core team have no time for it. > 2) Core team have no time to review big patches from outsiders. > 3) Backward compatibility has to be kept. 4) Knowledge of total length of packet is required only for current parser which need full packet to be

Re: [Firebird-devel] Wire protocol changes in Firebird 4?

2016-12-30 Thread Dmitry Yemanov
30.12.2016 14:19, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > > 1) Core team have no time for it. True. > 2) Core team have no time to review big patches from outsiders. Bullshit. > 3) Backward compatibility has to be kept. True. What a surprise! Dmitry

Re: [Firebird-devel] Wire protocol changes in Firebird 4?

2016-12-30 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
30.12.2016 12:10, Kovalenko Dmitry wrote: >>From my point of view, protocol must be rewrited > > At minimum: > 1. The each packet should contain the field with own size. > 2. It is necessary to solve the problems with LazySend mode. 1) Core team have no time for it. 2) Core team have no time to

Re: [Firebird-devel] Wire protocol changes in Firebird 4?

2016-12-30 Thread Kovalenko Dmitry
.nl] Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 8:51 PM To: For discussion among Firebird Developers <firebird-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: [Firebird-devel] Wire protocol changes in Firebird 4? Are there any wire protocol changes in Firebird 4 (or planned for Firebird 4). And if so, where c

Re: [Firebird-devel] Wire protocol changes in Firebird 4?

2016-12-19 Thread Carlos H. Cantu
No improvements regarding blob transfer? Even with the enhancements in 3.0, transferring blobs is still slow compared to other datatypes. []s Carlos http://www.firebirdnews.org FireBase - http://www.FireBase.com.br VK> 19.12.2016 19:51, Mark Rotteveel wrote: >> Are there any wire protocol

Re: [Firebird-devel] Wire protocol changes in Firebird 4?

2016-12-19 Thread Vlad Khorsun
19.12.2016 19:51, Mark Rotteveel wrote: > Are there any wire protocol changes in Firebird 4 (or planned for > Firebird 4). And if so, where can I find information on those changes? I could remember the only small change, bug fix for CORE-5296 by Alex (commit

[Firebird-devel] Wire protocol changes in Firebird 4?

2016-12-19 Thread Mark Rotteveel
Are there any wire protocol changes in Firebird 4 (or planned for Firebird 4). And if so, where can I find information on those changes? Mark -- Mark Rotteveel -- Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors