30.11.2011 12:24, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Is it able to discern between 32 and 64 bit?
Unfortunately, not.
On Windows Vista 64 bit (using Firefox 32 bit though)
I get the suggestion to download the Firebird 32 bit package.
This is the lesser evil. You know that 32-bit builds can work in both
On 11/30/11 12:33, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
30.11.2011 12:24, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Is it able to discern between 32 and 64 bit?
Unfortunately, not.
On Windows Vista 64 bit (using Firefox 32 bit though)
I get the suggestion to download the Firebird 32 bit package.
This is the lesser evil.
Hello, Alex!
Wednesday, November 30, 2011, 12:44:50 PM, you wrote:
AP Who knows which evil is lesser...
AP If one downloads 32-bit build for 64-bit OS, he can always stay with it
AP even not knowing that 64 builds exist.
I think this is design flaw of sf.net, and that's it.
Personally, I'd
30.11.2011 12:44, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
Who knows which evil is lesser...
If one downloads 32-bit build for 64-bit OS, he can always stay with it
even not knowing that 64 builds exist.
But at least it will work fine for him, even being possibly a bit slower
than the x64 build. And those who
On 11/30/11 11:16, Dmitry Kuzmenko wrote:
Hello, All!
I'm sorry writing this question here, bit I have not
access to firebird-admins.
Is it normal that SF alway suggesting to download
.Net driver?
For example, when I open
https://sourceforge.net/projects/firebird/
I see huge green
30.11.2011 11:37, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
So the reason is elsewhere.
Found it. SF has an ability to set the default download for the every
major platform (Win/Lin/Mac/etc). This option was left empty for the
server binaries but set for the .NET provider packages.
I have it fixed now for
Dmitry Yemanov [2011-11-30 08:44] :
Please test it and suggest any corrections.
For Linux 2.5.1 tar.gz is a better default choice than rpm
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a
