On 04/15/12 13:50, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote:
Those functions use -1 to indicate a special condition.
It's nice to use ~0 as a special condition instead -1.
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary
-Original Message-
From: Alex Peshkoff [mailto:peshk...@mail.ru]
Sent: Lunes, 16 de Abril de 2012 3:00
On 04/15/12 13:50, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote:
Those functions use -1 to indicate a special condition.
It's nice to use ~0 as a special condition instead -1.
The problem
On 04/16/12 12:55, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Alex Peshkoff [mailto:peshk...@mail.ru]
Sent: Lunes, 16 de Abril de 2012 3:00
On 04/15/12 13:50, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote:
Those functions use -1 to indicate a special condition.
It's nice to use ~0 as a
16.04.2012 13:21, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
I.e. with transaction ID
use of ~0 as special condition should be OK.
Doesn't internal transaction have id 0?
--
SY, SD.
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
On 04/16/12 15:25, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
16.04.2012 13:21, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
I.e. with transaction ID
use of ~0 as special condition should be OK.
Doesn't internal transaction have id 0?
Yes, system transaction has ID == 0.
How is it related?
-Original Message-
From: Dimitry Sibiryakov [mailto:s...@ibphoenix.com]
Sent: Lunes, 16 de Abril de 2012 7:25
16.04.2012 13:21, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
I.e. with transaction ID
use of ~0 as special condition should be OK.
Doesn't internal transaction have id 0?
Alex wrote ~0
16.04.2012 15:38, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
Not related if system transaction is never passed to these functions.
0 ~0
Dmitry
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and
16.04.2012 14:45, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote:
Alex wrote ~0 instead of 0, did you notice it?
Oops, my fault. :(((
--
SY, SD.
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and
-Original Message-
From: Dimitry Sibiryakov [mailto:s...@ibphoenix.com]
Sent: Lunes, 16 de Abril de 2012 7:47
16.04.2012 14:45, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote:
Alex wrote ~0 instead of 0, did you notice it?
Oops, my fault. :(((
The strange case of Mr ~ and its tricks, trying
Hi *,
any ideas about DNET-398 [1]? I sent the same data to create database
for 2.5 and 2.1, but no exception in response for 2.1(.3 and .4
confirmed). Anything I should look at?
[1] http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/DNET-398
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder)
10 matches
Mail list logo