Re: [Firebird-devel] Transaction type

2012-04-16 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 04/15/12 13:50, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote: Those functions use -1 to indicate a special condition. It's nice to use ~0 as a special condition instead -1. -- For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary

Re: [Firebird-devel] Transaction type

2012-04-16 Thread Claudio Valderrama C.
-Original Message- From: Alex Peshkoff [mailto:peshk...@mail.ru] Sent: Lunes, 16 de Abril de 2012 3:00 On 04/15/12 13:50, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote: Those functions use -1 to indicate a special condition. It's nice to use ~0 as a special condition instead -1. The problem

Re: [Firebird-devel] Transaction type

2012-04-16 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 04/16/12 12:55, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote: -Original Message- From: Alex Peshkoff [mailto:peshk...@mail.ru] Sent: Lunes, 16 de Abril de 2012 3:00 On 04/15/12 13:50, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote: Those functions use -1 to indicate a special condition. It's nice to use ~0 as a

Re: [Firebird-devel] Transaction type

2012-04-16 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
16.04.2012 13:21, Alex Peshkoff wrote: I.e. with transaction ID use of ~0 as special condition should be OK. Doesn't internal transaction have id 0? -- SY, SD. -- For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.

Re: [Firebird-devel] Transaction type

2012-04-16 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 04/16/12 15:25, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: 16.04.2012 13:21, Alex Peshkoff wrote: I.e. with transaction ID use of ~0 as special condition should be OK. Doesn't internal transaction have id 0? Yes, system transaction has ID == 0. How is it related?

Re: [Firebird-devel] Transaction type

2012-04-16 Thread Claudio Valderrama C.
-Original Message- From: Dimitry Sibiryakov [mailto:s...@ibphoenix.com] Sent: Lunes, 16 de Abril de 2012 7:25 16.04.2012 13:21, Alex Peshkoff wrote: I.e. with transaction ID use of ~0 as special condition should be OK. Doesn't internal transaction have id 0? Alex wrote ~0

Re: [Firebird-devel] Transaction type

2012-04-16 Thread Dmitry Yemanov
16.04.2012 15:38, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: Not related if system transaction is never passed to these functions. 0 ~0 Dmitry -- For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and

Re: [Firebird-devel] Transaction type

2012-04-16 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
16.04.2012 14:45, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote: Alex wrote ~0 instead of 0, did you notice it? Oops, my fault. :((( -- SY, SD. -- For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and

Re: [Firebird-devel] Transaction type

2012-04-16 Thread Claudio Valderrama C.
-Original Message- From: Dimitry Sibiryakov [mailto:s...@ibphoenix.com] Sent: Lunes, 16 de Abril de 2012 7:47 16.04.2012 14:45, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote: Alex wrote ~0 instead of 0, did you notice it? Oops, my fault. :((( The strange case of Mr ~ and its tricks, trying

[Firebird-devel] Creating does not always throw exceptions when it cannot create the database (DNET)

2012-04-16 Thread Jiri Cincura
Hi *, any ideas about DNET-398 [1]? I sent the same data to create database for 2.5 and 2.1, but no exception in response for 2.1(.3 and .4 confirmed). Anything I should look at? [1] http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/DNET-398 -- Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder)