[Firebird-devel] TcpRemoteBufferSize

2013-10-16 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
Hello, All. IIRC, couple of years ago Alex tested effect of increasing TcpRemoteBufferSize to network performance and the tests showed that size 1M results in significant performance boost for applications that fetch large volumes of data. But in current firebird.conf in 3.0 I still

Re: [Firebird-devel] TcpRemoteBufferSize

2013-10-16 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 10/16/13 13:25, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: Hello, All. IIRC, couple of years ago Alex tested effect of increasing TcpRemoteBufferSize Telling true I do not remember it... But quite possible. to network performance and the tests showed that size 1M results in significant

[Firebird-devel] [FB-Tracker] Created: (CORE-4245) Raise limit and default value for TcpRemoteBufferSize

2013-10-16 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov (JIRA)
Raise limit and default value for TcpRemoteBufferSize - Key: CORE-4245 URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4245 Project: Firebird Core Issue Type: Improvement

Re: [Firebird-devel] TcpRemoteBufferSize

2013-10-16 Thread Leyne, Sean
16.10.2013 14:58, Alex Peshkoff wrote: Telling true I do not remember it... But quite possible. Most likely my memory doesn't serve me well. Google shows me only thread where Carlos H. Cantu tested it up to current limit and got 3x speed up, then DE suggested to test it beyond the

Re: [Firebird-devel] TcpRemoteBufferSize

2013-10-16 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
16.10.2013 17:01, Leyne, Sean wrote: Is this buffer size setting configurable thru a connection/API setting? AFAIK, no. -- WBR, SD. -- October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you

Re: [Firebird-devel] TcpRemoteBufferSize

2013-10-16 Thread Carlos H. Cantu
I really dont remember if I was able to retest with 32K, but I found this message that suggests that the effect of changing this parameter is different with FB 2.5 compared to 2.1: - 21-Dec-2011 I ran more tests tonight, and results were very different from the past year