Too small new limit of alias length
---
Key: CORE-5282
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-5282
Project: Firebird Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Engine
Affects Versions: 3.0.0
On 06/14/2016 05:50 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 14.06.2016 16:43, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>> If you think it's pool's bug
> No, I don't think that missing protection from double deallocation of
> blocks is a bug.
>
>
Suggested in your patch has one disadvantage - block can be overwritten
14.06.2016 16:43, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> If you think it's pool's bug
No, I don't think that missing protection from double deallocation of blocks
is a bug.
--
WBR, SD.
--
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you?
On 06/14/2016 05:46 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 14.06.2016 16:30, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>> I've asked what does contain a block (i.e. it's hex
>> dump) which is deallocated second time...
>
> Try to apply attached patch and run some tests. Double deallocation
> seem to be more frequent than
14.06.2016 16:30, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
I've asked what does contain a block (i.e. it's hex
dump) which is deallocated second time...
Try to apply attached patch and run some tests. Double deallocation seem to be more
frequent than I expected or I did something wrong.
--
WBR, SD.
On 06/14/2016 05:37 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 14.06.2016 16:30, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>> That's nice but I've asked what does contain a block (i.e. it's hex
>> dump) which is deallocated second time...
> I think that you don't need bytes,
Then I can't help you any more...
> they are
14.06.2016 16:30, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> That's nice but I've asked what does contain a block (i.e. it's hex
> dump) which is deallocated second time...
I think that you don't need bytes, they are pointless without context.
Block's content
wasn't changed on deallocation, it still contain
On 06/14/2016 05:22 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 14.06.2016 16:17, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>> In dev_build - should. Except the head of a block which is reused for
>> internal needs. How big is a block? What does it contain?
> I got it on Savepoint. Quite small thing.
> Probably, there are
On 06/14/2016 05:03 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 14.06.2016 15:59, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>>>and how to determine which member is
valid?
union
{
MemPool*pool;
>> Used when block is allocated (points to the pool from which block is
>> allocated).
14.06.2016 16:17, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> In dev_build - should. Except the head of a block which is reused for
> internal needs. How big is a block? What does it contain?
I got it on Savepoint. Quite small thing.
Probably, there are more: I got about dozen crashes during full test cycle,
14.06.2016 15:59, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>> and how to determine which member is
>> > valid?
>> >
>> > union
>> > {
>> >MemPool*pool;
> Used when block is allocated (points to the pool from which block is
> allocated).
>> >MemBlock* next;
> Used when block is free (points to
On 06/14/2016 04:14 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> Hello, All.
>
> Do anybody know why in MemHeader this is an union
To save memory - that pointers are never used together.
> and how to determine which member is
> valid?
>
> union
> {
> MemPool*pool;
Used when block is
Hello, All.
Do anybody know why in MemHeader this is an union and how to determine which
member is
valid?
union
{
MemPool*pool;
MemBlock* next;
};
--
WBR, SD.
--
What NetFlow
Support AS CURSOR and . features in FOR EXECUTE STATEMENT loops
--
Key: CORE-5281
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-5281
Project: Firebird Core
Issue
Grant field rights + grant select to package = internal Firebird consistency
check (bad ACL (293), file: grant.cpp line: 2431)
---
Key: CORE-5280
15 matches
Mail list logo
