As there are not replies as of yet, can I assume there is no problem to
do this migration on Sunday 2012-08-05 (August fifth)
between 12:00 and 16:00 UTC (14:00 and 18:00 Central European Summer
Time)?
Mark
On 22-7-2012 15:25, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
I finished the instructions and tested them
I am working on the migration steps for Jaybird (I will send my
instructions for review when I have completed them).
cvs2svn creates some internal revisions (that is: revisions which don't
exist in CVS, for example for creating branches and tags), and by
default it doesn't assign a username to
On 16-7-2012 11:11, Pavel Cisar wrote:
Hi,
I did the conversion of main Firebird modules to SVN.
Dne 14.7.2012 17:19, Mark Rotteveel napsal(a):
Now that Jaybird 2.2 is released we want to migrate the CVS client-java
module to Subversion. Is there any documentation on how this was done
for
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 01:01:31 +0200, Roman Rokytskyy ro...@rokytskyy.de
wrote:
- should be integrated with Eclipse at least on the same level as CVS.
The latest versions of Eclipse supports git and the Eclipse project itself
has moved all their code to git, so I assume (without checking) that it
Hi,
I did the conversion of main Firebird modules to SVN.
Dne 14.7.2012 17:19, Mark Rotteveel napsal(a):
Now that Jaybird 2.2 is released we want to migrate the CVS client-java
module to Subversion. Is there any documentation on how this was done
for firebird?
Nope. As it was one-way,
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 12:30:23PM +0100, Lester Caine wrote:
Will Subversion actually add anything other than wasting time and
requiring people to rewrok their end of things.
From my point of view, there is one big drawback of CVS: it doesn't keep
information about which changes to different
On Sunday 15 Jul 2012 12:30:23 Lester Caine wrote:
Will Subversion actually add anything other than wasting time and requiring
people to rewrok their end of things.
Rewrok? We should add that as a new word in the language - To spend time fixing
things that worked fine before. :-)
Anyway,
15.07.2012 15:11, Paul Reeves wrote:
I've found subversion to be way quicker to checkout
It is strange because SVN usually doesn't use compression during network
transfer in
contrast to CVS. Of course, if you have 100mb network, it doesn't matter...
--
WBR, SD.
On 15-7-2012 13:30, Lester Caine wrote:
Mark Rotteveel wrote:
I don't want to make this a source control beauty contest:).
DO you actually NEED to migrate from CVS? Dimitry did ask, and to be honest,
in
the absence of a better option on the DVCS front, staying with CVS is just as
valid a
On 15-7-2012 16:51, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
15.07.2012 15:11, Paul Reeves wrote:
I've found subversion to be way quicker to checkout
It is strange because SVN usually doesn't use compression during network
transfer in
contrast to CVS. Of course, if you have 100mb network, it doesn't
Am 15. Juli 2012 18:23:55 schrieb Mark Rotteveel
I do know that Roman was already planning to migrate to Subversion
before I joined, so maybe he has additional reasons.
Reasons were:
- same VCS for Firebird (core project uses SVN, some others do as well);
- should be supported by SF.net and
Now that Jaybird 2.2 is released we want to migrate the CVS client-java
module to Subversion. Is there any documentation on how this was done
for firebird?
I have looked into some tools, but they either require a local CVS
repository, or those tools which support remote CVS require a local
On 14-7-2012 17:19, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Now that Jaybird 2.2 is released we want to migrate the CVS client-java
module to Subversion. Is there any documentation on how this was done
for firebird?
I have looked into some tools, but they either require a local CVS
repository, or those tools
On 14-7-2012 17:31, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
14.07.2012 17:28, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
I have looked into some tools, but they either require a local CVS
repository, or those tools which support remote CVS require a local
Subversion server, both of which are not really an option.
IFAIR,
14 matches
Mail list logo
