> As the Intel platforms will be the *huge* majority, what about this:
>
> win32 | win64 |win64-arm
>
> or this:
>
> win32-x86 | win64-x86 | win64-arm
>
> or just:
>
> win32 | win64-x86 | win64-arm
That seems pretty inconsistent (in regards to other filenames).
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
On 25-08-2022 15:13, Stefan Heymann wrote:
I propose this name convention starting with Firebird 5:
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86-pdb.exe
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86-pdb.zip
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86.exe
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86.zip
>> > I'd like to suggest you use win32 and win64 instead of x86 and x64. Or, it
>> > you want to keep the "windows" prefix, use window-32 and windows-64.
>> > For me as a Windows user this would be much more logical (the 86 comes
>> > from the 80*86 processor, the 64 comes from 64 bits, so
> In the past win32 and win64 was good but now Windows exists for ARM64.
> x86, x(86-)64, arm64, etc. are more clear. But I am not a core developer
> just a user. :-)
Same for me.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
2022.08.25. 15:13 keltezéssel, Stefan Heymann írta:
I'd like to suggest you use win32 and win64 instead of x86 and x64. Or, it you want to
keep the "windows" prefix, use window-32 and windows-64.
For me as a Windows user this would be much more logical (the 86 comes from the
80*86 processor,
> I propose this name convention starting with Firebird 5:
> Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86-pdb.exe
> Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86-pdb.zip
> Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86.exe
> Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86.zip
> Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x64-pdb.exe
>
On 25-08-2022 12:38, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
Dmitry Yemanov wrote 25.08.2022 12:34:
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86-withDebugSymbols.exe
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86-withDebugSymbols.zip
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86.exe
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86.zip
On 25/08/2022 07:38, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>
> Is this zero after build number necessary?
>
It's packaging number.
We had this type of problem in Windows build in the past, where retag
was not necessary and the package number was increased.
Adriano
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web
On 25/08/2022 07:19, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> On 25-08-2022 03:15, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>> On 24/08/2022 08:45, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>>>
>>> I propose this name convention starting with Firebird 5:
>>>
>>
>> Here is my updated proposal based on the discussion so far:
Dmitry Yemanov wrote 25.08.2022 12:34:
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86-withDebugSymbols.exe
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86-withDebugSymbols.zip
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86.exe
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86.zip
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x64-withDebugSymbols.exe
25.08.2022 04:15, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Here is my updated proposal based on the discussion so far:
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86-withDebugSymbols.exe
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86-withDebugSymbols.zip
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86.exe
On 25-08-2022 03:15, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 24/08/2022 08:45, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
I propose this name convention starting with Firebird 5:
Here is my updated proposal based on the discussion so far:
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86-withDebugSymbols.exe
On 24/08/2022 08:45, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>
> I propose this name convention starting with Firebird 5:
>
Here is my updated proposal based on the discussion so far:
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86-withDebugSymbols.exe
Firebird-5.0.0.2816-0-windows-x86-withDebugSymbols.zip
On 24/08/2022 09:32, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
> On 8/24/22 15:03, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>> On 24/08/2022 08:59, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>>> On 24-08-2022 13:45, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
This is our Firebird 4.0.2 released files:
>>> [..]
It's
On 24/08/2022 12:04, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
>>
>> The Linux builds are not complete builds compared to Windows pdb
>> builds (e.g. config files, documentation, security database, etc are
>> missing)
>>
>
> Yep, they contain only binaries with debug-info.
>
Linux "debuginfo"
On 24/08/2022 12:33, Paul Reeves wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 16:04:20 +0200
> Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>
>> On 24-08-2022 15:36, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>>> Mark Rotteveel wrote 24.08.2022 15:32:
If the term is confusing or ambiguous, it already is so in its current
form.
>>>
>>>
>> How crazy idea it would be to have even Linux builds with binaries?
>>
>
> May be I've lost context - but we release linux builds with binaries
> since the first days of the project.
Sorry. I meant debug(info) builds with binaries.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/
On 8/24/22 19:33, Jiří Činčura wrote:
How crazy idea it would be to have even Linux builds with binaries?
May be I've lost context - but we release linux builds with binaries
since the first days of the project.
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
How crazy idea it would be to have even Linux builds with binaries?
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 16:04:20 +0200
Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> On 24-08-2022 15:36, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> > Mark Rotteveel wrote 24.08.2022 15:32:
> >> If the term is confusing or ambiguous, it already is so in its current
> >> form.
> >
> > Yes, it is. That's why I would suggest to
Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote 24.08.2022 17:00:
Sorry, but they are created by 'cp' command ;) One can run them directly.
Wow. That's crazy.
--
WBR, SD.
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
On 24-08-2022 17:00, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
On 8/24/22 17:10, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote 24.08.2022 16:06:
Same for linux - not stripped binaries provided.
Nope. Firebird-debuginfo-4.0.2.2816-0.amd64.tar.gz contains only
extracted
On 8/24/22 17:14, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 24-08-2022 16:06, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
On 8/24/22 17:04, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 24-08-2022 15:36, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
Mark Rotteveel wrote 24.08.2022 15:32:
If the term is confusing or ambiguous, it already is so in its
On 8/24/22 17:10, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote 24.08.2022 16:06:
Same for linux - not stripped binaries provided.
Nope. Firebird-debuginfo-4.0.2.2816-0.amd64.tar.gz contains only
extracted debug symbols, not binaries.
Sorry, but they are created by
On 24-08-2022 16:06, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
On 8/24/22 17:04, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 24-08-2022 15:36, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
Mark Rotteveel wrote 24.08.2022 15:32:
If the term is confusing or ambiguous, it already is so in its
current form.
Yes, it is. That's why I
Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote 24.08.2022 16:06:
Same for linux - not stripped binaries provided.
Nope. Firebird-debuginfo-4.0.2.2816-0.amd64.tar.gz contains only extracted
debug symbols, not binaries.
--
WBR, SD.
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
On 8/24/22 17:04, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 24-08-2022 15:36, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
Mark Rotteveel wrote 24.08.2022 15:32:
If the term is confusing or ambiguous, it already is so in its
current form.
Yes, it is. That's why I would suggest to change that.
The Windows pdb packages are
On 24-08-2022 15:36, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
Mark Rotteveel wrote 24.08.2022 15:32:
If the term is confusing or ambiguous, it already is so in its current
form.
Yes, it is. That's why I would suggest to change that.
The Windows pdb packages are complete builds though. So maybe those
Mark Rotteveel wrote 24.08.2022 15:32:
If the term is confusing or ambiguous, it already is so in its current form.
Yes, it is. That's why I would suggest to change that.
--
WBR, SD.
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
On 24-08-2022 14:50, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
Dmitry Yemanov wrote 24.08.2022 14:47:
I would unify the `pdb`, `debuginfo`, etc. into simple `debug` suffix.
Agreed.
And better to keep "debuginfo" verb, IMHO to prevent confusion after
expectation to find "a debug build" in "debug"
On 8/24/22 15:03, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 24/08/2022 08:59, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 24-08-2022 13:45, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
This is our Firebird 4.0.2 released files:
[..]
It's difficult to understand, they do not mention OS and hardware
architectures are
Dmitry Yemanov wrote 24.08.2022 14:47:
I would unify the `pdb`, `debuginfo`, etc. into simple `debug` suffix.
Agreed.
And better to keep "debuginfo" verb, IMHO to prevent confusion after
expectation to find "a debug build" in "debug" package.
--
WBR, SD.
Firebird-Devel mailing list,
24.08.2022 15:35, Jiří Činčura wrote:
I would unify the `pdb`, `debuginfo`, etc. into simple `debug` suffix.
Agreed.
Dmitry
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
I would unify the `pdb`, `debuginfo`, etc. into simple `debug` suffix.
Probably Alex can clarify, but it really the ARM32/64 for Linux? And if so, do
we even need ARM32?
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
On 24/08/2022 08:59, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> On 24-08-2022 13:45, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>> This is our Firebird 4.0.2 released files:
>>
> [..]
>> It's difficult to understand, they do not mention OS and hardware
>> architectures are inconsistent.
>>
>> I propose this name convention
On 24-08-2022 13:45, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
This is our Firebird 4.0.2 released files:
[..]
It's difficult to understand, they do not mention OS and hardware
architectures are inconsistent.
I propose this name convention starting with Firebird 5:
[..]
Hi!
This is our Firebird 4.0.2 released files:
Firebird-4.0.2.2816-0-Win32-pdb.exe
Firebird-4.0.2.2816-0-Win32-pdb.zip
Firebird-4.0.2.2816-0-Win32.exe
Firebird-4.0.2.2816-0-Win32.zip
Firebird-4.0.2.2816-0-x64-pdb.exe
Firebird-4.0.2.2816-0-x64-pdb.zip
Firebird-4.0.2.2816-0-x64.exe
37 matches
Mail list logo
