Re: [Firebird-devel] Remote protocol backward compatibility

2012-01-05 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 01/04/12 13:46, Mark Rotteveel wrote: On 4-1-2012 8:30, marius adrian popa wrote: On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:23 AM, W Osistemas2000profesio...@gmail.com wrote: I agree. I just use FB 2.5 Greetings. Walter. I would go to accept only protocol from 2.0 1.5.x is not supported anymore

Re: [Firebird-devel] Remote protocol backward compatibility

2012-01-05 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
05.01.2012 12:35, Alex Peshkoff wrote: When I checked it on interbase server some time ago protocol 10 was supported. But connection with fbclient to Interbase XE fail. -- SY, SD. -- Ridiculously easy VDI. With

Re: [Firebird-devel] Remote protocol backward compatibility

2012-01-05 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 01/05/12 15:39, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: 05.01.2012 12:35, Alex Peshkoff wrote: When I checked it on interbase server some time ago protocol 10 was supported. But connection with fbclient to Interbase XE fail. That means that it was before XE.

Re: [Firebird-devel] Remote protocol backward compatibility

2012-01-04 Thread Mark Rotteveel
On 4-1-2012 8:30, marius adrian popa wrote: On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:23 AM, W Osistemas2000profesio...@gmail.com wrote: I agree. I just use FB 2.5 Greetings. Walter. I would go to accept only protocol from 2.0 1.5.x is not supported anymore anyway

Re: [Firebird-devel] Remote protocol backward compatibility

2012-01-04 Thread marius adrian popa
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Mark Rotteveel m...@lawinegevaar.nl wrote: On 4-1-2012 8:30, marius adrian popa wrote: On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:23 AM, W Osistemas2000profesio...@gmail.com   wrote: I agree. I just use FB 2.5 Greetings. Walter. I would go to accept only protocol from  

[Firebird-devel] Remote protocol backward compatibility

2012-01-03 Thread Dmitry Yemanov
All, Would there be any objections if we remove the support for protocol versions less than 10? It means that fbclient would not connect to pre-v6 versions of InterBase and fbserver would not accept connections from pre-v6 versions of gds32. All Firebird versions would still be supported, as

Re: [Firebird-devel] Remote protocol backward compatibility

2012-01-03 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 01/03/12 20:04, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: All, Would there be any objections if we remove the support for protocol versions less than 10? It means that fbclient would not connect to pre-v6 versions of InterBase and fbserver would not accept connections from pre-v6 versions of gds32. All

Re: [Firebird-devel] Remote protocol backward compatibility

2012-01-03 Thread Claudio Valderrama C.
-Original Message- From: Dmitry Yemanov [mailto:firebi...@yandex.ru] Sent: Martes, 03 de Enero de 2012 13:05 Would there be any objections if we remove the support for protocol versions less than 10? It means that fbclient would not connect to pre-v6 versions of InterBase

Re: [Firebird-devel] Remote protocol backward compatibility

2012-01-03 Thread Mark Rotteveel
On 3-1-2012 17:04, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: All, Would there be any objections if we remove the support for protocol versions less than 10? It means that fbclient would not connect to pre-v6 versions of InterBase and fbserver would not accept connections from pre-v6 versions of gds32. All

Re: [Firebird-devel] Remote protocol backward compatibility

2012-01-03 Thread W O
I agree. I just use FB 2.5 Greetings. Walter. On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Mark Rotteveel m...@lawinegevaar.nl wrote: On 3-1-2012 17:04, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: All, Would there be any objections if we remove the support for protocol versions less than 10? It means that

Re: [Firebird-devel] Remote protocol backward compatibility

2012-01-03 Thread marius adrian popa
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:23 AM, W O sistemas2000profesio...@gmail.com wrote: I agree. I just use FB 2.5 Greetings. Walter. I would go to accept only protocol from 2.0 1.5.x is not supported anymore anyway http://www.firebirdsql.org/en/roadmap/ On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Mark