22.06.2016 10:28, Jiří Činčura wrote:
>> And this may be considered a bug :-) given that InterBase returns two
>> strings for this tag.
>
> Do you want me to put to tracker?
Let's see what others think. This is really a low priority thing.
Dmitry
> And this may be considered a bug :-) given that InterBase returns two
> strings for this tag.
Do you want me to put to tracker?
Here's again raw bytes for that tag. It's really just one message.
[0]: 12
[1]: 30
[2]: 0
[3]: 1
[4]: 28
[5]: 87
[6]: 73
[7]: 45
22.06.2016 09:57, Jiří Činčura wrote:
> I was just confused by isc_info_isc_version having
> just one.
And this may be considered a bug :-) given that InterBase returns two
strings for this tag.
AFAIU, in the old days we've just replaced isc_info_isc_version with
isc_info_firebird_version in
OK, so it's expected. I was just confused by isc_info_isc_version having
just one.
I'll adjust it in the provider.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
--
Attend Shape: An AT Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at
21.06.2016 22:45, Jiří Činčura wrote:
> I'm sending the isc_info_firebird_version, isc_info_end only in
> op_info_database. And the buffer I get back is:
> 103
isc_info_firebird_version
> 74, 0,
total length of the returned clumplet
> 2,
number of strings inside the clumplet
> 28, 87, ...
> AFAIK, it's not. And I don't see how it can happen in the code.
I'm sending the isc_info_firebird_version, isc_info_end only in
op_info_database. And the buffer I get back is:
103, 74, 0, 2, 28, 87, 73, 45, 86, 51, 46, 48, 46, 48, 46, 51, 50, 52,
56, 51, 32, 70, 105, 114, 101, 98, 105, 114,
21.06.2016 19:58, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> AFAIK, it's not. And I don't see how it can happen in the code.
AFAIR, each layer adds its own version to the result, so it is engine
version + Y-valve
version or remote Y-valve + local Y-valve.
--
WBR, SD.
21.06.2016 19:48, Jiří Činčura wrote:
>
> when I ask for isc_info_firebird_version (currently on FB3) it looks to
> me I get response for isc_info_isc_version followed by
> isc_info_firebird_version together. Is that expected?
AFAIK, it's not. And I don't see how it can happen in the code.
Hi *,
when I ask for isc_info_firebird_version (currently on FB3) it looks to
me I get response for isc_info_isc_version followed by
isc_info_firebird_version together. Is that expected? Maybe it was some
compatibility shim.
I.e. for isc_info_firebird_version on FB3:
length: 76
manually
