[Firebird-devel] Test (please ignore)

2022-09-21 Thread Mark Rotteveel
Test (please ignore) -- Mark Rotteveel Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel

[Firebird-devel] test

2022-09-16 Thread Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel
TEST Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel

[Firebird-devel] Test, please ignore.

2022-08-09 Thread Pavel Zotov
Foo... Bar... Baz!    Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel

Re: [Firebird-devel] test

2019-02-18 Thread Mark Rotteveel
On 17-2-2019 18:36, liviuslivius wrote: test message, because i have send two emails 16.02.2019 23:12 and 16.02.2019 23:27 but i still do see them on the group I have them in my mailbox now, it looks like they were stuck for almost a day within SourceForge: Received: from [127.0.0.1]

[Firebird-devel] test

2019-02-17 Thread liviuslivius
test message, because i have send two emails 16.02.2019 23:12 and 16.02.2019 23:27 but i still do see them on the group   regards, Karol Bieniaszewski  Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel

[Firebird-devel] Test

2018-04-29 Thread Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
Test, please ignore -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at

Re: [Firebird-devel] Test - please ignore

2017-09-30 Thread Vlad Khorsun via Firebird-devel
Test 2 -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at

[Firebird-devel] Test - please ignore

2017-09-27 Thread Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
. -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at

[Firebird-devel] test

2017-08-23 Thread Yakov Hrebtov
test -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at

[Firebird-devel] test

2017-08-18 Thread Vlad Khorsun via Firebird-devel
Ignore please Vlad -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at

Re: [Firebird-devel] Test bugs.core_3554 randomly fails

2016-06-18 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 06/17/2016 07:11 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > 17.06.2016 17:58, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: >> Or perhaps do such a check in the remote client, or even better in the >> Y-valve? > In this case the test will fail always. > > Tests are also fixed sometimes ;)

Re: [Firebird-devel] Test bugs.core_3554 randomly fails

2016-06-17 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
17.06.2016 17:58, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > Or perhaps do such a check in the remote client, or even better in the > Y-valve? In this case the test will fail always. -- WBR, SD. -- What NetFlow Analyzer can do for

Re: [Firebird-devel] Test bugs.core_3554 randomly fails

2016-06-17 Thread Dmitry Yemanov
17.06.2016 17:13, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > > As most of you know, when routine protocol.cpp:alloc_cstring() receives zero > length, it > behaves differently, depending on previous allocations. In some cases it > returns pointer > to zero-length string, in some - NULL pointer. > Because of

[Firebird-devel] Test bugs.core_3554 randomly fails

2016-06-17 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
Hello, all. As most of you know, when routine protocol.cpp:alloc_cstring() receives zero length, it behaves differently, depending on previous allocations. In some cases it returns pointer to zero-length string, in some - NULL pointer. Because of this, used in subj test query