On 04/04/11 23:56, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote:
Claudio, please try this patch. It should fix this bug.
And can you please also provide full stacktrace for this case? For me
cleanup member was never left uninitialized cause all modules
were doing
setCleanup(). I wonder what module caused
On 04/07/11 14:39, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
07.04.2011 14:15, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
So, i think, this is the bug.
Agreed.
+1
We can fix engine (make PIO_create to create files in FW=ON mode, or add new
parameter to it)
I think we must take isc_dpb_gbak_attach into an account. When it is
set,
On 04/11/11 19:53, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 11-04-2011 07:28, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
PS Alex will explain you why struct or class with data members is
bad for *portable* code.
Taking into an account Dmirty's sample with XSQLDA I must say that may
be not everything SO bad
On 04/11/11 21:00, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 11-04-2011 13:25, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
On 04/11/11 20:19, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 11-04-2011 13:15, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
On 04/11/11 19:53, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 11-04-2011 07:28, Alex Peshkoff wrote
On 04/13/11 12:02, Geoff Worboys wrote:
Why: developers/end users can more easily choose and connect
to a database on a Firebird server, even point and click.
Point and click should be implemented by client, not by server.
I cannot speak for the original author, but it seems to me the
one
On 04/13/11 14:55, Kjell Rilbe wrote:
But, all things considered, I feel that the feature is too complicated
and has too many security implications to be worth it. If anything, I
might suggest that the alias config that's already present could be
augmented with a flag for each alias
On 04/13/11 16:02, Kjell Rilbe wrote:
Den 2011-04-13 12:55 skrev Kjell Rilbe såhär:
I might suggest that the alias config that's already present could be
augmented with a flag for each alias specifying if it should be
available for browsing or not (default = no). Those marked as available
On 03/17/11 18:29, Woody wrote:
Just curious, has there been any discussion about expanding aliases to allow
defining just a path to a directory where multiple database reside?
The reason I'm asking is that in some situations, my apps are designed to
allow the users to archive fiscal data.
Believe me or not, but there is not tricks known to me. It just works :)
Vlad, looks like FIREBIRD_BOOT_BUILD env variable is not set during
windows build. I do not say that it's too much important, but it helps
to avoid UDF dependencies (we do not UDF during boot build), set correct
owner
On 04/19/11 22:47, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 19-04-2011 13:02, Paul Reeves wrote:
However, if it hasn't been changed it would require a ton of work for each
icu
version, which is one of the reasons why we haven't upgraded icu.
No, it's surely not.
I've done a patch for a
On 04/21/11 09:14, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Alex Peshkoff [mailto:peshk...@mail.ru]
Sent: Martes, 19 de Abril de 2011 4:38
Do you have file \builds\win32\defs\plugin.def ?
Yes and besides the license, it says
EXPORTS
firebird_plugin
On 04/29/11 12:11, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
Sorry if I am impatient :) I wanted to try the new synchronization
code on the Debian build daemons (3.0 so far supported only
x86/amd64).
Should build now - revision 52840.
On 05/03/11 13:34, Antti Nivala wrote:
(Reposting, because the HTML message was distorted in the archives.)
Hi,
Does the following look like a Firebird 2.1.4 bug, or are we doing
something wrong?
We are upgrading from Firebird 2.1.2.18118 to Firebird 2.1.4.18393. We
use Firebird Embedded
On 05/09/11 21:15, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
09.05.2011 18:48, Leyne, Sean wrote:
I disagree. Shadow is the only method for synchronous replication in
Firebird now.
Synchronous replication on a single server is not replication.
Don't forget about NFS and iSCSI(?).
Why _only_ NFS?
On 05/09/11 14:06, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
To run SuperClassic you should use switch -m in command line of
firebird.exe
(on Windows) or run fb_smp_server (on Posix, here i'm not sure and Alex will
correct me)
Small correction. There is no more fb_smp_server on posix. There is also
single
On 05/10/11 07:36, wuu wrote:
hi, all. I need help, when build Firebird 2.1.3 or 2.1.4.
CPU info : freescale P2020 QorIQ, powerpc e500v2 core
..
Any ideas how to fix it?
First of all provide full build log.
On 05/07/11 21:14, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
-=| Damyan Ivanov, Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 05:40:12PM +0300 |=-
-=| Alex Peshkoff, Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 01:26:28PM +0400 |=-
On 04/29/11 12:11, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
Sorry if I am impatient :) I wanted to try the new synchronization
code on the Debian
On 05/11/11 13:11, wuu wrote:
thank you, I'll enable debug to get more info.
And 2.5 also can't compile :
http://firebird.1100200.n4.nabble.com/file/n3514200/build_2.5.log
build_2.5.log
error info :
in src/common/classes/fb_atomic.h, line 518, #error AtomicCounter: implement
appropriate
On 05/11/11 17:02, Pawel Sawicki wrote:
Hi All,
We are running application which has dedicated signal handler. It uses
libfbclient-2.5 to connect to
Firebird database. When it receives signal 15 it tries first to shutdown
active database connections
with help of detach_or_drop_database
On 05/13/11 09:43, Russell R wrote:
This post is related to the following 2 reported incidents:
http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-3121
http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-3121
http://firebird.1100200.n4.nabble.com/Error-Restoring-v2-1-Database-to-v2-5-td2994314.html
On 05/16/11 20:33, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
Could you explain, please, semantics of addRef/release on public
provider interfaces?
The issue was discussed on this list with two possibilities:
- when refCount = 1, release does things like detach, rollback, free,
etc. It's what was implemented so
Speaking about documentation i'd said we must document usage of every
public
interface and specify explicitly how instance is constructed and destroyed.
Well - with this adjustment I can agree with every style.
(Though must say that addRef/release pair in our interfaces is already
On 05/17/11 16:07, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
To support wrong code and solve nothing. With the cost of all this mess,
all this otherwise unneeded discussion, all the global/local pool mess.
...only emotions and offence...
Agreed - nothing except emotions ...
On 05/16/11 21:00, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
We can introduce some special mode to report such errors using exceptions,
or write message into log, or even provide callback for debugging purposes.
But Adriano's question was about *semantics*. So, do you agree with me
that
explicit
Hi, Marius!
We need a new define for hurd
Do you need help in creating prefix.hurd_i386 file?
afther we undefine LINUX that part compiles but i hit another issues
that i found it to be in haikuos too
g++ -I../src/include/gen -I../src/include -I../src/vulcan -DNAMESPACE=Vulcan
-gg
On 05/17/11 19:34, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 17/05/2011 04:05, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
In FB2.5 yValve did not need any more MT-safeness except provided by
atomic counters and some helper locks like hanlers' map RwLock.
Initially I've planned to keep same approach for FB3. But I did
On 05/18/11 16:07, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
Sorry for cross posting, I asked this in firebird-support but I got no answer
so far.
I recently installed Firebird 2.5 on a FreeBSD, it was running ok
until this moring when suddendly it stopped accepting connections.
The server runs via inetd.
Not responding you directly, but anyway...
I'd want to say again that user should not pass a function to
upgradeInterface. Every function (except some ones from base-core
classes / IStatus) should consistently use a first parameter of type
IStatus. The upgradeInterface should point
Hi all, I ask you to take a look at
http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-3462
and suggested solution. Is it OK for 2.5? I ask cause formally this is
API change, though very small and 100% backward compatible.
--
On 06/22/11 11:13, Roman Rokytskyy wrote:
Would be interesting to check how does Firebird behaves.
Roman, we have some implementation of tpc-c, which works with firebird.
I often use it to check firebird stability under load. But telling true
it seems that it measures using some other tpmC. I
On 06/22/11 13:35, marius adrian popa wrote:
Could you publish the sources in github/sourceforge for tpc
Sorry - no. License issues.
--
Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger.
On 07/27/11 13:40, Roman Rokytskyy wrote:
So, considering this all, there should be (theoretically) no problem
of
compiling the code in Free Pascal as long as it will produce
binaries
with appropriate entry points. That should be possible
out-of-the-box
(at least it was discussed that
On 07/27/11 15:45, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
27.07.2011 13:40, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
Before doing JIT, we must think about related security issues. How can
we prevent pascal procedure from doing bad things with firebird runuser
access rights?
Leave it to DBA/sysdmin? In trade-off security
On 07/27/11 16:05, Roman Rokytskyy wrote:
6. Just in time compilation of the embedded procedure on first use
(after create/alter) into a shared library/DLL which is then
effectively
a dynamically generated UDF library. A JIT approach is important
because
the database can be moved between
On 07/27/11 16:42, ik wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 15:35, Tony Whyman
tony.why...@mccallumwhyman.comwrote:
This is really a general UDF problem and another reason why you need to
be very careful about deploying them. The only difference between an
embedded function and UDF one is that
On 07/27/11 16:05, marius adrian popa wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Alex Peshkoff peshk...@mail.ru wrote:
On 07/27/11 15:11, Tony Whyman wrote:
6. Just in time compilation of the embedded procedure on first use
(after create/alter) into a shared library/DLL which
On 07/27/11 23:07, Treeve Jelbert wrote:
I am trying to build the latest checkout of fb3
on amd64 linux-2.6.39.3 , using gcc-4.6.1 and glibc-2.13
Treeve, I can't confirm problems from both your letters.
I've built today
fbs2 / # gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.6.1
fbs2 / # as --version
GNU
On 08/06/11 09:47, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Alex Peshkoff [mailto:peshk...@mail.ru]
Sent: Lunes, 01 de Agosto de 2011 2:56
On 07/30/11 11:04, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote:
Hello, each time I compile, I get
thd_priority.obj : warning LNK4221: no public
On 08/08/11 19:10, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
08.08.2011 16:57, Kjell Rilbe wrote:
So, I ask you in the devel team: is the shadow file feature going to go
away or will you make sure it stays functional?
If discussion about dropping of shadow is ever raised I will vote against.
+1
It would not be appropriate for the project to change the
License header, in any way.
Which would be fine if the link actually went to Embarcadero
but it seems that
the inprise domains are now owned by advertising scammers? I
think in this case
changing it is appropriate as
В Чт., 25/08/2011 в 05:04 +, Maya Opperman пишет:
The Firebird Project team is happy to announce that the v.2.5.1 release
candidate kits for Linux and Windows 32-bit and 64-bit platforms are ready
for testing.
http://firebirdsql.org/en/firebird-2-5-1-rc1
Yippee!!!
What
Wouldn't it be better to join a new attachment to an existing
distributed transaction?
No. Attachment *itself* can't participate in distributed transaction. At
least
not directly. Transaction of this attachment - can. Just understand:
attachment
*is not a* transaction.
On 08/31/11 12:25, Fulvio Senore wrote:
I must admit that I was executing each query in its own transaction.
Since I was only executing SELECT statements I was thinking that there
was no problem in working this way. I never had performance problems
with Windows and Linux in virtual
On 09/13/11 17:23, Jiri Cincura wrote:
Hi *,
is there some high level description of how the %subj% works and is
defined [1]? I'd like to think about it from .NET/CLR POV.
Looks like not. Not sure about other languages interface specifics, but
general plugin certainly has [1] interface.
On 09/19/11 15:34, Laszlo KAROLYI wrote:
Any suggestions? I googled for this error, but it seems like mutex usage
is already fixed in FreeBSD.
You should read ~/doc/README.build.posix.html and tune your kernel
before using FB on freebsd.
On 09/20/11 12:17, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
Hi,
I have a Perl script that used IBPerl for connecting to Firebird. The
script is used for some mass data processing, and uses alarm() to
provide feedback (prints number of processed input lines).
That same script used to work just fine until I
On 09/20/11 12:59, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
perl alarm.pl db.fdb
Well, now I see
20665817
on the screen. Must say that this is DEV_BUILD. I will try with release
one now.
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT
On 09/20/11 14:08, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
On 09/20/11 12:59, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
perl alarm.pl db.fdb
Well, now I see
20665817
on the screen. Must say that this is DEV_BUILD. I will try with release
one now.
With release build I confirm segfault
On 09/20/11 20:08, Laszlo KAROLYI wrote:
Thank you, I tuned my FreeBSD according to the settings in the page, and
now it works.
Please keep supporting FreeBSD, our work depends on it :)
Thanks, we'll do.
Did you consider to support Firebird by joining Firebird Foundation?
On 09/30/11 20:19, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Hi!
Look at this piece. The original code wastes 8 bytes per Record variable
in 64-bits.
Do you see any problem with this change?
diff --git a/src/jrd/req.h b/src/jrd/req.h
index 8271b3e..7db0f39 100644
---
On 10/01/11 18:54, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 01-10-2011 03:22, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
Also look in ProcedureScan.cpp on the usage of irsb_message.
The VaryingString could be replaced by a UCHAR[], and since the memory
is dynamic allocated, it must be surely aligned even
On 10/10/11 11:24, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:11:40 +0200, Thomas Steinmaurer
t...@iblogmanager.com wrote:
I think that the Oracle WHEN-clause is simply syntactic sugar for
wrapping
the entire body in an IF-condition. I don't think there would be much
difference
On 10/10/11 11:47, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
10.10.2011 9:41, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
But telling true I do not think that such game
is worth playing - too many conditions should be met.
It is worth for Oracle because
a) condition is evaluated in SQL machine and let it avoid switching to PL
On 10/10/11 13:48, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
10.10.2011 12:26, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
If such clause is inside trigger code then it not affects security checks
and
*whole* trigger code is checked. SQL standard says something about security
checks for conditional triggers ?
I believe the rules are
On 10/10/11 14:36, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 10/10/2011 04:47, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
b) trigger body can be in Java. Firebird don't have both these problems.
Wrong reason, as Oracle doesn't support external triggers.
You would just need to code a PL/SQL trigger that calls
On 10/13/11 18:00, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
A crash dump is available here:
http://www.iblogmanager.com/download/misc/fb251_x64_crashdump.zip
I see why it is crashed (during error reporting about failed read from
config file) and i can fix it.
But i don't see why read was failed. And
On 10/14/11 11:18, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
On 10/13/11 18:00, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
A crash dump is available here:
http://www.iblogmanager.com/download/misc/fb251_x64_crashdump.zip
I see why it is crashed (during error reporting about failed read
from config file) and i can
On 10/19/11 17:41, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
Hello Alex,
there is a minor difference for the trace data output for an
unauthorized vs. authorized attach database event.
Successful:
2011-10-19T14:32:05.9090 (1760:05F47F48) ATTACH_DATABASE
tourism.fdb (ATT_1772, HIC:NONE,
On 10/25/11 13:56, Paul Reeves wrote:
On Tuesday 25 October 2011 at 11:12 marius adrian popa wrote:
In other words: if you use Ext3 and you note performance regressions
with this release, try disabling barriers (barriers=0 mount option).
I can understand doing this for routine desktop work.
On 10/25/11 14:03, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 25/10/2011 07:56, Paul Reeves wrote:
On Tuesday 25 October 2011 at 11:12 marius adrian popa wrote:
In other words: if you use Ext3 and you note performance regressions
with this release, try disabling barriers (barriers=0 mount
On 10/26/11 14:26, Lester Caine wrote:
Paul Reeves wrote:
Everything really depends on the manufactures claims that the capacitors can
flush the cache successfully. Can we trust them?
It's not just the drives capacity that matters here. Most of the machines
I've
checked will continue to
On 11/14/11 02:59, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 13-11-2011 19:48, Alexandre Benson Smith wrote:
I understand that such improvement could be hard to implement because of
the changes on the API and that the access libraries must be recoded for
such change, this could be a reason to
On 11/17/11 00:38, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
Is user, running that script, a member of group firebird?
No and I can't make it. I am a mere user on the porter machines :)
That's a pity and can be even a reason not to deliver ASTs between
processes. On the other hand we have 2 processes started by
On 11/17/11 11:37, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
17.11.2011 11:26, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
And one more interesting line:
open(./fb_init, O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_LARGEFILE, 0600) = 7
Why is _SHARED_ file opened in CWD? It should go to /tmp/firebird.
Because he explicitly sets FIREBIRD_LOCK to CWD before
On 11/17/11 14:14, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 17/11/2011 07:52, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
The only way to guarantee ordered writes is to flush individual pages
and this is what FW=ON does.
Or to flush group of independent pages at once, like I proposed. I think
this can be a great
On 11/17/11 15:37, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
On 11/17/11 14:14, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 17/11/2011 07:52, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
The only way to guarantee ordered writes is to flush individual pages
and this is what FW=ON does.
Or to flush group of independent pages at once, like I
On 11/17/11 15:23, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 17/11/2011 09:19, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
On 11/17/11 14:14, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 17/11/2011 07:52, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
The only way to guarantee ordered writes is to flush individual pages
and this is what FW
On 11/28/11 17:03, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
- Support for the inserting SYSDBA role trick, although I'm not sure if
this is still important due to the new authentication plugin mechanism
This will become not needed not due to authentication plugins, but due
to mapping server logins (names we
On 11/29/11 02:53, Pierre Y. wrote:
Alex,
I think I found the problem : -lfbclient can't find libfbclient.so
I added /opt/fb3cs/lib to ldconfig.conf.d but it don't changes anything.
Finally I changed the compile command to :
$ LC_ALL=C g++ -Wall -I../firebird/src/include -o firetest -fPIC
On 11/29/11 12:23, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:19:27 +0400, Alex Peshkoff peshk...@mail.ru
wrote:
I think very strange to still have to build
DPB by hand... Can you expose something that may give access to the
ClumpletWriter to ease that ?
Probably it's worth thinking about
On 11/29/11 13:37, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 29/11/2011 05:49, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
May be we can think about builting function like index_expr. That's just
raw idea, but may be something like
INDEX_EXPR(ALIAS.indexName)
is better than
This is up to the user to create
On 11/30/11 02:42, Frank Ingermann wrote:
DROP SOURCE OF [procedure name|trigger name|*]
or
CHANGE OWNER OF [db object|*] TO new_owner
This approach looks much better than use of system package.
--
All the data
On 11/30/11 11:16, Dmitry Kuzmenko wrote:
Hello, All!
I'm sorry writing this question here, bit I have not
access to firebird-admins.
Is it normal that SF alway suggesting to download
.Net driver?
For example, when I open
https://sourceforge.net/projects/firebird/
I see huge green
On 11/30/11 12:33, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
30.11.2011 12:24, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Is it able to discern between 32 and 64 bit?
Unfortunately, not.
On Windows Vista 64 bit (using Firefox 32 bit though)
I get the suggestion to download the Firebird 32 bit package.
This is the lesser evil.
On 11/30/11 14:39, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
30.11.2011 9:08, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
Or more object type bound, e.g.:
ALTER TABLE ... CHANGE OWNER TO ...
ALTER VIEW ... CHANGE OWNER TO ...
etc..
ALTER PROCEDURE ... DROP SOURCE;
I have no idea if the SQL standard suggests here
On 11/30/11 13:50, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 30/11/2011 03:53, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
On 11/30/11 02:42, Frank Ingermann wrote:
DROP SOURCE OF [procedure name|trigger name|*]
or
CHANGE OWNER OF [db object|*] TOnew_owner
This approach looks much better than use of system package
On 12/01/11 14:34, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
Hello, All.
Let's say I defined few UDR triggers and I need to keep rather big array
of shared
information bound to a transaction. What is the best (fastest) way to do it?
If I have to organize my own storage, I need to identify the
On 12/02/11 11:26, Pierre Y. wrote:
Hi,
I advanced a bit more with this new API but I just absolutely don't
see how to deal with FbMessage. What is it ? How do I have to use it
to access (or send ?) data ?
Thank you for your help, Regards,
There is a way to create FbMessage, using boost
On 12/05/11 04:23, Geoff Worboys wrote:
So the power example would become:
declare external function dPower
double precision by descriptor, double precision by descriptor,
double precision by descriptor, integer by descriptor
returns parameter 3
returns exception 4
entry_point 'power'
On 12/07/11 13:39, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 07/12/2011 07:31, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
On 12/05/11 04:23, Geoff Worboys wrote:
So the power example would become:
declare external function dPower
double precision by descriptor, double precision by descriptor,
double precision
On 12/07/11 14:54, Pierre Y. wrote:
I expect the Delphi people will work on it.
No way, I'm afraid. I'm quite good in Delphi, but I have no idea how to
convert C++
classes to Delphi classes.
I can help.
I'm very interrested in seeing how to use the new Firebird OO API in
Delphi. We
On 12/08/11 22:33, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
-=| Damyan Ivanov, 18.11.2011 21:27:26 +0200 |=-
Maybe it's libedit interfering with libfbembed. I'll try the same
thing using the perl driver and see if strace will give any hints.
No luck.
I wrote a primitive isql-like tool that is able to create
On 12/12/11 15:43, Pierre Y. wrote:
Hi All,
Thanks to Vlad, we achieved the translation of the FB3 OO API in UIB
Components for Delphi.
You can checkout the code from SourceForge repository :
https://uib.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/uib/trunk
Now, we only miss hints to deal with
On 12/14/11 20:02, Carlos H. Cantu wrote:
One year ago, when I was discussing this with Vlad, I did small
Delphi app using ZeosDB components to measure speed between FB and
MySQL similar databases with same data, hosted on remote computer and
acessing by adsl connection. Results proved that
(gdb) print *attachment
Não é possível acessar a memória no endereço 0x732b9040
Does such dirty attachment arrive in any test or only in some specific?
--
10 Tips for Better Server Consolidation
Server
On 12/15/11 15:54, Carlos H. Cantu wrote:
Yes, but note that now my link is 20Mbits/s download:
1 *** Esgotado o tempo limite do pedido.
210 ms11 ms 7 ms bd232401.virtua.com.br [189.35.36.1]
3 8 ms11 ms11 ms bd07980b.virtua.com.br
On 12/16/11 14:39, Carlos H. Cantu wrote:
AP With 14 nodes between client and server that's known that we have
AP problems. We perform too many roundtrips between client and server
AP compared with MySQL. Possible solutions are:
AP - modify API to have big calls (like attach database, start
On 12/16/11 15:58, Carlos H. Cantu wrote:
AP Hmm...
AP Did we have it in FB3 roadmap?
I doubt that. But afaik, FB 3 is not feature freeze yet ;)
Certainly not.
But there is Q1-2012 as alpha release date. If we do not plan to touch
API, there are no big problems to change protocol before
On 12/16/11 16:45, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
16.12.2011 13:40, Carlos H. Cantu wrote:
there is plenty of time for testing.
It is not actually about testing, but rather practical usability. API can
work without
any glitch, but don't provide some functions that are required for real
On 12/16/11 17:30, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 16/12/2011 11:25, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
On 12/16/11 16:45, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
16.12.2011 13:40, Carlos H. Cantu wrote:
there is plenty of time for testing.
It is not actually about testing, but rather practical usability
On 12/19/11 15:48, Tony Whyman wrote:
I am responsible for some servers that are still running the LTS Release
Ubuntu 8.04 and which I want to upgrade to Firebird 2.5.1, preferable
using a Debian package rather than building each one from source - the
production servers don't normally have
On 12/19/11 17:08, Tony Whyman wrote:
Oops - a typo - meant kernel 2.6.24!
glibc 2.7 is OK, what about kernel 2.4.24 - not sure, I've started
development with 2.6.27
Does kernel 2.4 support NPTL correctly?
That should be sooner of all OK. But telling true I'd prefer something
newer - it's
On 12/19/11 21:43, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
19.12.2011 17:58, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
but here security problem
comes. User will not know, does he work with new server (using secure
channel) or with old one (insecure channel).
Make isc_attach_database() to return warning if insecure channel
On 12/19/11 21:43, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
19.12.2011 17:58, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
but here security problem
comes. User will not know, does he work with new server (using secure
channel) or with old one (insecure channel).
Make isc_attach_database() to return warning if insecure channel
On 12/20/11 14:06, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
20.12.2011 7:30, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
Returning to that useful idea - the problem is that when the warning can
be returned password was already passed to the net in legacy unsafe
form.
But here you are saying that legacy form is unsafe. AFAIR
On 12/20/11 14:19, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
20.12.2011 11:16, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
The new auth protocol will not truncate the longer password
but the legacy one will, AFAIU.
In this case there is no security breath: if a malefactor has got
truncated password by
bruteforcing legacy
On 12/20/11 14:38, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 20/12/2011 08:19, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
On 12/20/11 13:54, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 20/12/2011 06:57, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
connect: client's public key, login and database name = server
accept: server's public key
Till today we always used to provide security database pre-configured
for use with single record for SYSDBA with masterke(y) password. In FB3
we have at least two reasons to stop use that schema:
- having masterkey as default preset-ted SYSDBA's password is security
vulnerability cause people are
On 12/20/11 17:26, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 20/12/2011 11:20, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
I wonder is it possible to change windows installer to initialize
security database. Next, for ZIP install people will have to run gsec
first time manually. Are this changes OK for us?
I don't
On 12/20/11 22:04, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
20.12.2011 18:22, Paul Reeves wrote:
o Add a checkbox that allows a user to keep SYSDBA/masterkey.
Default will be unchecked. If unchecked then next screen will ask
user to enter new password.
This gets my vote.
Just one idea. May be not
1 - 100 of 2127 matches
Mail list logo
