On 08-04-2011 13:43, alexpeshk...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Revision: 52693
http://firebird.svn.sourceforge.net/firebird/?rev=52693view=rev
Author: alexpeshkoff
Date: 2011-04-08 16:43:05 + (Fri, 08 Apr 2011)
Log Message:
---
Use interface IBlrMessage
How is this feature related to upcoming support for schemas?
This feature have nothing common with schema support.
Regards,
Vlad
PS Access to the aliases list via new service seems enough as for me.
--
Forrester
I spend some time for revision and adaption of your copy of ICU library for
VS2010
Thanks
1. Reduce number of compiler warnings
I defined the _CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS=1 in firebird2intl.props
Good change, imho
2. Creation of PDB files for all binaries (debug/release)
Not
Hello, I will continue making noise until I'm explained how the new build
system is supposed to work. I'm tired of checking for possible differences
between the VC10 and VC8 projects and my VC9 project.
I found no differences between VC8 and VC9 (except of usage of manifest
files and file
However, the important thing to note is, that backing up and restoring
does not rectify the problem! Backing up and restoring finish their
respective jobs without problems, but the validation problem is
*immediately* there (i.e. without any usage of the DB between restoring
and validating).
I see that there this problem was analized completly
More-or-less
Is this really plan to fix this in FB3.0
None, AFAIK
Vlad Korshun say that only transaction id will be unsigned int in FB3.0 - is
this true
or is in plan to fix this with two record header versions or other
we must provide binaries inside our Windows package :(
Yes, that is right.
I don't object to agreeing on a specific version of ICU for each release. We
would just change the build script as required. (Presumably we will need .lib
files.) Our main problem is likely to be finding icu
All metadata objects moved into Attachment. Metadata syncronization is
guarded
by attachment's mutex now. Database::SyncGuard and company are replaced by
corresponding Attachment::XXX classes.
To make AST's work we need to release attachment mutex sometimes. This is
very
important change
In this case may I suggest to use separate memory pool for the cache's
elements?..
It is already separate
Someday someone could implement shared memory pool...
It is already shared ;)
Regards,
Vlad
--
Are there any database-level ASTs known to implicitly access the
attachments? When should they lock the appropriate mutex?
Database-level ASTs not need to access attachment internals usually.
Usually differs from always :-) I seem to remember cases when the
AST saves lck_attachment into
-Original Message-
From: Vlad Khorsun [mailto:hv...@users.sourceforge.net]
Sent: Lunes, 09 de Mayo de 2011 6:07
To avoid contention on common dbb_pool its usage was
replaced by att_pool when
possible. To make this task slightly easy there was
introduced jrd_rel
On 05/16/11 20:33, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
Could you explain, please, semantics of addRef/release on public
provider interfaces?
The issue was discussed on this list with two possibilities:
- when refCount = 1, release does things like detach, rollback, free,
etc. It's what was implemented so
On 16/05/2011 13:33, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
So, if code calls attach\release - this is bug, as for me, and i see
no reasons
to write code in this way intentionally. I consider at as very bad practice
as it
could lead to the inexpected side effects (such as implicit rollback).
Now every
I downloaded the Firebird-3.0.0.29349 snapshot of firebird, for a test.
After unzipping the archive, I ran Firebird from the command prompt by:
firebird.exe -a
No errors were written to firebird.log at that moment, but as soon as I want
to
connect to a database using ISQL I have the
PS: There is a paper
(http://www.aristeia.com/Papers/DDJ_Jul_Aug_2004_revised.pdf) from Scott
Meyers and Andrei Alexandrescu showing even or volatile usage in base
classes are wrong. Unfortunately it's down.
With MSVC we are safe as we use volatile and compiler used read\write
memory
On 17-05-2011 19:58, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
PS: There is a paper
(http://www.aristeia.com/Papers/DDJ_Jul_Aug_2004_revised.pdf) from Scott
Meyers and Andrei Alexandrescu showing even or volatile usage in base
classes are wrong. Unfortunately it's down.
With MSVC we are safe as we use
So, what I'm saying is that MaxFileSystemCache may be useful for classic
as well, in some situations. I haven't tried it though. Still on 2.1.
And you speak about FileSystemCacheSize setting which was introduced
in v2.5 and allows to limit size of file system cache. This is system-wide
Hello,
currently investigating nbackup reliability/bugs. CORE-2648 is marked as
fixed in 2.1.4 and CORE-3521, which is currently open, seems to like
similar (forced writes vs. flushing to disc).
How do they differ?
CORE-2648 set FW mode for delta file in the same value as of main
So, before CORE-2648 was fixed, delta file was always opened in FW=OFF
mode
despite of database settings.
So, if the server crashes, we have a problem here?
If database setting is FW = ON but (before the fix) delta file is opens
with FW = OFF
then Firebird crash in stalled (or
2. Constrained by the engine i must use RootDirectory so i can set the
file location. Changing the variable in the conf file had no affect.
The only way i could make the RootDirectory change is by setting
Environment variable, but unfortunately thats not a good for solution
for my application
Thanks Vlad, i tried that as well before posting here, but it didn't work.
If i do get this to work, will i be able to set a relative path to the DB
file?
Sorry, i'm not sure i understand what does you did, what you got and
what you really need. More details could help us to help you ;)
I am currently going over the XA implementation in Jaybird, and this
prompted some questions regarding transactions, connections and
two-phase commit in Firebird.
First of all: are transactions associated with the connection that
created it, or is it possible to 'share' the same
28.08.2011 15:52, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
Certainly, we can make API look like we_do_ join a new attachment to an
existing distributed transaction. To do so we just start new transaction
in API call internally (need to know TPB...) and join it with existing
distributed transaction.
What
The XA semantics are a bit complicated, but essentially the database is a
Resource Manager (RM), and a distributed transaction is assigned an Xid by
the Transaction Manager (eg in the case of JavaEE it could be the
application server). If I read the spec correctly, it is expected that a
Look also at isc_reconnect_transaction() API which allows to
re-connect to the in-limbo
transaction at recovery phase and finally commit or rollback it.
As far as I have seen, this is already done in Jaybird.
Very good.
So the commit can
be done from any connection, but what
At the first glance it's possible to avoid loading trigger's body with
WHEN clause.
Should we check permissions of trigger's code ? If yes - we will load
it anyway at query (insert\update\delete) prepare time.
Regards,
Vlad
On 10/10/11 11:53, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
At the first glance it's possible to avoid loading trigger's body with
WHEN clause.
Should we check permissions of trigger's code ? If yes - we will load
it anyway at query (insert\update\delete) prepare time.
We should not check permissions
10.10.2011 12:26, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
If such clause is inside trigger code then it not affects security checks and
*whole* trigger code is checked. SQL standard says something about security
checks for conditional triggers ?
I believe the rules are the same. In general, it's impossible
Thanks to Vlad and Alex the 2.5.2 snapshot from today (Oct. 17th) works
fine so far from a Trace API POV. ;-)
Thanks for confirmation :)
One question though, which isn't specific to the 2.5.2 snapshot. I've
seen that the various fb_trace* files in e.g. c:\programdata\firebird
aren't
25.10.2011 14:03, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
2) FW=OFF, and use fsync on COMMIT - pages will not be reordered, and
when COMMIT happens they will be written to disk in order
I believe this is wrong assumption. Nobody guarantees that OS will be
flushing the dirty pages from the
Running CORE-3650 test-case in different isql embedded sessions with
SharedCache and SharedDatabase, I had (one time) a hang and a crash. The
crash happened after the first command. I ran it in session1, session2,
session1, etc (or some variant).
This is more or less expected. When shared
On 11/14/11 02:17, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
I thought about to change cache_writer in this direction - make it to do
mini-flush
instead of writting one page at time. But, note, we have no cache_writer
thread in CS\SC
and we can do a little (almost nothing) when page lock is downgraded
Hi Vlad,
as the subject says. What's the unit for the resulting values for number
of reads, writes, fetches, marks? Just want to be sure if a particular
result makes sense here. ;-)
Same as for isql's statistics - number of operations. Note, we have no
operations on group of pages,
Hello,
I have the following character set (ISO88591) information in the trace
output:
2011-10-27T20:58:16.5210 (920:00D4DA30) COMMIT_TRANSACTION
fbtm_unittest.fdb (ATT_2, FBTM:NONE, ISO88591, TCPv4:127.0.0.1)
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Steinmaurer t...@iblogmanager.com
To: For discussion among Firebird Developers
firebird-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 12:11 AM
Subject: Re: [Firebird-devel] Trace API - What's the unit for number of (reads
|fetches ...)
the fbtrace.conf sample file has examples on what services names one
can/should use when using e.g. the include filter. I'm not sure if the
following is ok or as designed, thus I'm checking here ...
I want to trace Database Stats and I tried the following include filter
samples:
1)
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Steinmaurer t...@iblogmanager.com
To: For discussion among Firebird Developers
firebird-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 12:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Firebird-devel] Trace API - Service names in include filter?
the fbtrace.conf
It would be also interesting if reads exposed in various places (isql,
monitoring tables, trace api) are pure physical reads from disk and/or
fetched from the OS file system cache.
I guess, it could be also from the file system cache, because I've seen
situations where execution time is
Vlad,
PS Snapshot (concurrency) transaction guarantees that once read record
could be read again and will be the same. So, in theory, we can just
re-read same data page when looking for next record.
Why in theory?
Because i want to be careful and don't want to make too early
Dmitry Yemanov [2011-10-25 17:55] :
25.10.2011 14:39, Philippe Makowski wrote:
in fact with theses settings, FW=OFF is safer than before
safe enough to be the default ?
Even in the paranoid mode (MaxUnflushedWrites = 1) they still don't
guarantee the write order. So, if the crash
On 11/17/11 14:14, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 17/11/2011 07:52, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
The only way to guarantee ordered writes is to flush individual pages
and this is what FW=ON does.
Or to flush group of independent pages at once, like I proposed. I think
this can be a great
On 16-11-2011 22:39, Frank Ingermann wrote:
...but it leads to an endless loop/recursion (using latest Fb3 beta)
:-(
Before decide what to do, I'd like to hear Vlad about the error
isc_dsql_cte_wrong_clause, which, for example, happens if a recursive
query has a GROUP BY.
Why is it
On 18/11/2011 05:38, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
On 16-11-2011 22:39, Frank Ingermann wrote:
...but it leads to an endless loop/recursion (using latest Fb3 beta)
:-(
Before decide what to do, I'd like to hear Vlad about the error
isc_dsql_cte_wrong_clause, which, for example, happens if a recursive
columns
-Original Message-
From: Vlad Khorsun [mailto:hv...@users.sourceforge.net]
Sent: Martes, 29 de Noviembre de 2011 5:36
While i agree with you about SUBSTRING, i think the much
better solution
will be to allow to index COMPUTED BY columns. It allows to
not compare
I may be wrong, but I'm unable to find a way how a trace plugin can call
engine to get
more information that is sent via parameters.
Particularly I'm interested in getting BLOB/array content from
trace_dsql_execute()
handler.
Is it possible to expand TraceConnection class to
I can help.
I'm very interrested in seeing how to use the new Firebird OO API in
Delphi. We gave it a try two weeks ago and we only succeeded with the
getVersion() function ! Everything else generated errors or access
violations.
Could you send to me your Delphi wrapper for the API ?
On 09/12/2011 16:34, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
CORE-3073 [1] requires special BLR verb meaning get the default value
of a field. There is request to expose the same functionality in SQL
too, but doesn't matter here.
These cascade triggers are system triggers but are backed-up and
restored. If we
We can even trow exception on execution of such verbs and suggest to
re-create corresponding metadata object.
Hum? It will throw exception automatically, why would we need to bother
and it then?
It must be parsed correctly to allow to create metadata from backup.
But at execution
As I said before, ext4 performance with FW=ON is much slower than ext3,
but I now found something new.
I've verified that with FB 2.5, TCS times was ok (0s - 3s), and only
with FB 3 they are very bad (first test takes 16s, then 12s, 8s, 7s, 7s,
etc)
What I found is that:
Times was bad
So now we're spending time while the database is not even completely
created.
While we can restore previous behavior (put FW ON flag at header page
when database is created but create db file with this flag switched off) i
prefer
to ask - are we really want to maintain this hack ?
It is not actually about testing, but rather practical usability. API can
work without
any glitch, but don't provide some functions that are required for real
usage. As an
example - API for trace plugins which is enough for single existing plugin
but missed
access to BLOBs/arrays
It looks like the snapshots on the website do no include embedded.
It is included. There is no separate packages for server\embedded.
All binaries are at single common archive.
Regards,
Vlad
--
Write once. Port to
03.01.2012 13:00, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
Not sure about current state of code (you can easily check yourself),
but quite sure that UDRs should behave exactly like classical SPs, i.e.
it should be possible to grant rights to them.
With the difference that these grants cannot be checked at
03.01.2012 18:06, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
Who will be the CALLER if UDR function is used in SELECT statement issued by
client ?
CALLER is UDR itself, so this question is meaningless for me, sorry.
If we speak about statements that issued by UDR - certainly. But if we
speak about
UDR
How do I debug if firebird server running with code changes that we made?
Are you asking how to debug applications ? Using debugger ;)
I am running fbserver.exe with -a -p 3050 -database
localhost:..\myDatabase.fdb. Firebird tray icon is showing me that
nothing has been attached and
I have a database with Firebird 2.5.0 embedded which I want to access
from a regular application started by the currently logged in user
(member of the local workstation administrators group) and a Windows
service application.
I can do this just fine when going through a regular Firebird
I'm on Server 2008 and seemingly can't use drwatson anymore, so I'm trying to
use DebugDiag, which I'm not familiar with, please excuse the poor
stacktrace. The following's from the middle of the crash report.
Function Arg 1 Arg 2 Arg 3 Source
msvcr80!memmove+5a
On 03/30/12 09:32, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
Hello,
have a few occurences of the following in a Firebird 3 (Build: 29892)
trace output.
2012-03-30T07:28:46.6410 (952:03822F68) FREE_STATEMENT
tourism.fdb (ATT_162, TOURISM:NONE, UNICODE_FSS, TCPv4:127.0.0.1)
C:\Program
have a few occurences of the following in a Firebird 3 (Build: 29892)
trace output.
2012-03-30T07:28:46.6410 (952:03822F68) FREE_STATEMENT
tourism.fdb (ATT_162, TOURISM:NONE, UNICODE_FSS, TCPv4:127.0.0.1)
C:\Program Files (x86)\Upscene Productions\Database Workbench 4
03.04.2012 10:44, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
To not read whole database searching
for the not encrypted pages after restart i offer to store last encrypted
page number
at header page (also, obviously, we need to store encription state on the
header
such as clear, encrypted, encryption
VK Encryption must be resistent to the database shutdown\server restart
and so on.
VK Therefore it must be restartable. As we going to add encrypted flag for
each page
VK we can know pages that already encrypted. To not read whole database
searching
VK for the not encrypted pages
Pages itself does not need that flags - they are being written
in atomic way, so they can't be in progress.
VK This flag is *required* to distinguish encrypted pages. I don't
understand
VK why do you object it.
Because I consider decryption as a single-user operation. Seems you
I suppose that simultaneous encryption (changing encryption state of DB)
and nbackup will not be possible.
Why ?
Getting half-crypted DB copy is something too exotic :-)
Physical backup is physical backup, i.e. page-level copy of a database.
It have
nothing common with encryption
On 04/04/2012 10:14, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
Getting half-crypted DB copy is something too exotic :-)
Physical backup is physical backup, i.e. page-level copy of a
database. It have
nothing common with encryption state, and i see no problem if physical
backup of
half-encrypted database
On 04/04/2012 10:32, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
On 04/04/2012 10:14, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
Getting half-crypted DB copy is something too exotic :-)
Physical backup is physical backup, i.e. page-level copy of a
database. It have
nothing common with encryption state, and i see no problem
On 04/04/2012 11:12, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
Do you have better idea ?
Yes, I do!
If encryption detects (at start or after it) that database is in backup
mode, it stops its activity and the next-page-to-encrypt will not advance.
At merge time, if database is in encrypting state
Ok, I would like to create a type. If
typedef ULONG TxnType;
is too awkward, suggest something better.
Don't name it TxnType, please. It is transaction *number* and not
an isolation level, for example. We already have RecordNumber and
PageNumber, let be consistent.
Regards,
Vlad
17.04.2012 14:53, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote:
Ok, I would like to create a type. If
typedef ULONG TxnType;
is too awkward, suggest something better.
TxnId or txn_id_t or something like that.
Look, currently we have
SLONG tra_number; // transaction number
compare it with
TxnType
17.04.2012 14:20, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
TraNumber tra_number;
From another side, it's isc_info_tra_id in API, TRANSACTION_ID in
context variables and MON$TRANSACTION_ID in the monitoring tables :-)
This is another important point. There is user POV and user (public) data
types
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Steinmaurer t...@iblogmanager.com
To: develop-list firebird firebird-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 5:15 PM
Subject: [Firebird-devel] CORE-3539 - Trace addition
Hello,
thanks for extending the trace output with more
I have an application that is using Firebird DB. After running for some
time, application get stuck in following stack trace of fbclient.dll
Always tell version of software you use\complain about. Information about
environment also required.
In the dump, there are many thread that are
what's needed to create a warning trace event in context of the
CORE-3539 addition? How does a WARNING output look like. The example in
the tracker is only for ERROR AT.
WARNING output looks like ERROR with WARNING instead of ERROR :)
You can look at CORE-3690 or CORE-3801, for
Thanks a lot Vlad for quick response.
Sorry for missing information.
fbclient version is 2.1.1.17910 in Windows 2k3 Service Pack 2 x86 processor.
2.1.4 was released a while ago and 2.1.5 is expected soon. Even if there
was some
bug in old 2.1.1 - it is impossible to fix it there.
Thanks again Vlad for clarification.
One more clarification, is it Ok, to use differenct connection object to the
same DB simultaneously.
As much as your HW allows :)
Regards,
Vlad
--
Live Security Virtual
Is it enough to agree that keeping warnings in our API is the only
correct solution?
I, personally, prefer to have warnings, but, probably it should be
delivered not using status-vector. If we can produce and deliver many
warnings per statement (or per API call) it will be the best, as for
downloaded todays snapshot build. While a faulty database filter doesn't
crash the server anymore, I wonder if it is a security breach, when the
physical path of the security database is transferred to the trace
client. A typical trace output looks like that now:
Trace session ID 1
Happened again this morning, and I've got a mini-dump this time; who wants it?
Send me the url where i can download it
Regards,
Vlad
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways
tracing sweeps is a very nice addition, thanks!
Glad you like it ;)
I can't get the detailed information about relations for the
SWEEP_PROGRESS event type though.
Ooops, per-table stats was disabled in RELEASE builds for sweeper. Will fix
it now.
Thanks,
Vlad
Hello Vlad,
tracing sweeps is a very nice addition, thanks!
Glad you like it ;)
I can't get the detailed information about relations for the
SWEEP_PROGRESS event type though.
Ooops, per-table stats was disabled in RELEASE builds for sweeper. Will
fix it now.
I noticed
Hello, y write to the developer group because i'm observing a very strange
behaviour in transaction counter,
and i don't know what needed for open it in the tracker.
I use 2.5.2 superclassic in windows 2008 server 64 bits. I have migrated one
customer from Interbase 2009
to Firebird
from a previous discussion, I was told that there is no way to trace
embedded SQL statements of stored procedure / trigger.
True
While this is true for regular DML statements, stored procedures calling
other procedures result in additional EXECUTE_PROCEDURE_* events, so I'm
able to
There is idea to add trace event for every point at PSQL module which
was
recognized by parser as start of some statement (the line numbers available
at debug info\call stack).
I think these ideas should not mix concepts of trace with debug and
profile. So for what it will be
I think these ideas should not mix concepts of trace with debug and
profile. So for what it will be useful?
Trace *is* very useful for both debugging and profiling.
No objections here. Especially at the absence of better tools ;-)
True.
Ask google for SQL Server Profiler, btw. Ask
I think that making everyone pay the cost of the overhead generated by so
many hooks inside the engine is a very bad idea.
Are you measured trace overhead ? Compare call of a function with cost of
statement execution...
For me, it would be a
great thing if all tracing and encryption
What was the problem?:-)
You need at least one connection to the specified database. ;-)
If you have lock table file to analyze and no database connections at
moment,
you can use -f switch instead of -d, btw. First database connection will reset
lock
table...
Regards,
Vlad
Thomas,
Thank you for testing and feedback !
Vlad
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can
In check_duplicates (idx.cpp), there are these lines:
Firebird::HalfStaticArrayUCHAR, 256 tmp;
...
desc1.dsc_address = tmp.getBuffer(idx_dsc_length);
It seems there may be an alignment problem here, when idx_dsc_length = 256.
Probably
However, I'm unable to
I don't know wether it has something to do with CORE-3940, but
...
gbak:activating and creating deferred index IDX_RMGM_IMPORT_DNA
gbak:cannot commit index IDX_RMGM_IMPORT_DNA
gbak: ERROR:operating system directive CreateFile failed
gbak: ERROR:Das Gerät ist nicht bereit.
i
On 4-10-2012 19:30, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
I don't know wether it has something to do with CORE-3940, but
...
gbak:activating and creating deferred index IDX_RMGM_IMPORT_DNA
gbak:cannot commit index IDX_RMGM_IMPORT_DNA
gbak: ERROR:operating system directive CreateFile failed
gbak
I agree that sometime more context from intermediate levels could
help to better understand what happens. For example, when transliterate
error happens it is good to know assignment destination (field or
variable) name. I'm not sure it is easy to implement. But in the case
of CreateFile failed
Hello, All!
The fix effectively disables JRD_reschedule calls. For example in
btr.cpp:scan() JRD_reschedule will
never yield control to another thread because it is always called with at
least one latch.
Since AST processing in Firebird 2.5 and later requires yield of control this
the fbtrace.conf for FB 2.5.2 states:
# String values should be enclosed into (any kind of) quotes if contains
# spaces embedded, for example:
# log_filename 'C:\Documents and Settings\Firebird\My Documents\trace.log'
# include_filter Database Stats
What if the string contains
All,
I'd like to get opinions whether the on disconnect triggers should be
fired in the cases when some connection is forcibly closed.
We have a number of cases that cause a more or less asynchronous
disconnection:
1) server shutdown
2) database shutdown
3) connection shutdown via
05.01.2013 12:35, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
05.01.2013 10:55, Александр Пешков wrote:
When record on a data page is garbage collected a lot of other pages are
touched - indices
for example.
A dumb question: when touched pages are flushed to disk?
a) after each single version
05.01.2013 12:35, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
05.01.2013 10:55, Александр Пешков wrote:
When record on a data page is garbage collected a lot of other pages are
touched - indices
for example.
A dumb question: when touched pages are flushed to disk?
a) after each single version removal
18.03.2013 19:11, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
...
And this is what I saw it's required to support, but do you think the
current code allows it?
As far as I know - yes, it does.
I'm not sure I understand you. More below.
Let me try to explain it
, as the engines will call a yvalve
19.03.2013 21:52, Dmitry Kovalenko wrote:
Hi
Work with server from multiple clients [IBProvider test system]:
firebird.exe!set_server(rem_port * port=0x, unsigned short flags=56)
Строка 5455 + 0x6 байтC++
firebird.exe!SRVR_main(rem_port * main_port=0x, unsigned short
So the solution is either to check return value for NULL in
xnet_connect_wait_thread() (as inet_connect_wait_thread() does) or throw
exception instead of returning NULL, either in XNET_connect() or as deep
as in connect_server() (in src/remote/os/win32/xnet.cpp). I'm not
familiar with the
But in v2.5 there was correct code, so bug was introduced in trunk only.
So far i'm failed to see revision before 51654, i.e. before srvr_w32.cpp
was moved
from src/remote/os/win32 to the src/remote/server/os/win32...
It seems to be introduced after the move, by SVN revision 51742 /
I think, crash can reproduced without any problem ...
Could you test just committed patch for it ?
Thanks,
Vlad
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download
1 - 100 of 1074 matches
Mail list logo
