> I would still like to see a shim
Honestly. If somebody sponsors my time, I'll do it. Else I'll take the
straight to the finish approach.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
--
> Looks like SharpZipLib it is. I checked right now and it's using MIT
> license now, which should allow to take a piece of code and use.
I was wrong. They use GPL. So it's going to be code from Ionic. I doubt
most developers care as long as it works. :D
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT
I would still like to see a shim and as one default implementation you could
use SharpZibLib.
Von: Jiří Činčura [mailto:j...@cincura.net]
Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Juli 2016 15:05
An: firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Zlib library
Umm, yeah. Massive 9
Umm, yeah. Massive 9 votes.
Looks like SharpZipLib it is. I checked right now and it's using MIT
license now, which should allow to take a piece of code and use.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
--
OK. Vote here http://goo.gl/X4hCxG . Not sure we'll get enough votes,
though, to make it significant for decision. Arguments are welcome as
well.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
--
What NetFlow Analyzer
One thing I realized now. We might also consider is future .NET
Core/CoreCLR support...
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
--
Attend Shape: An AT Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT Park in San
Francisco, CA
> There is also ILMerge option to include dependency in a package.
Somebody would probably need to study the license, whether that's
allowed. Also hiding it is nice, but giving "some credits" isn't a bad
thing either (and I don't mean some line in README).
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT
> SharpZipLib looks to be more actively maintained and with clearer and
> more
> permissive licensing. It's a dependency of most of my project anyway so I
> would not mind it.
Kind of. On the other hand when it's done, like *done*, there's not much
to change.
> An alternative to an external
There is also ILMerge option to include dependency in a package.
On 21 June 2016 at 11:02, Gerdus van Zyl wrote:
> SharpZipLib looks to be more actively maintained and with clearer and more
> permissive licensing. It's a dependency of most of my project anyway so I
>
SharpZipLib looks to be more actively maintained and with clearer and more
permissive licensing. It's a dependency of most of my project anyway so I
would not mind it.
An alternative to an external dependency is an intree copy with unnecesary
bits(eg. bzip2,tar) removed.
Out of curiosity why is
Hi *,
Other topic to think about. The compression is Firebird is based on zlib
compression. That one is not in the framework. So unless somebody contributes
solid and proven implementation, when and if the compression will make it to
master, I'd have to introduce dependency. Maybe some sort of
11 matches
Mail list logo