: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Changing transaction isolation levels
[huge break]
So no other opinions?
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder) http://blog.cincura.net/ |
http://www.ID3renamer.com
--
Live
So no other opinions?
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder)
http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security
On 16-9-2012 7:53, Jiri Cincura wrote:
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Michael Ludwig mil...@gmx.de wrote:
so why try faking it?
Because sometimes you're using some tools, designers, wizards. And who
knows why they will ask for ReadUncommitted. And if you can't change
it, you'll be stuck.
Hi *,
recently I went across bugs and found DNET-337. Read it, think about it.
What my idea is, is to change ReadCommitted and ReadUncommitted to
have same [1] TPB and use rec_version [2].
[1] Because there's no uncommitted mode in Firebird and I think it's
better than throw an exception.
[2]
Jiri Cincura schrieb am 15.09.2012 um 13:40 (+0200):
… I went across bugs and found DNET-337. Read it, think about it.
http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/DNET-337
What my idea is, is to change ReadCommitted and ReadUncommitted to
have same [1] TPB and use rec_version [2].
[1] Because
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Michael Ludwig mil...@gmx.de wrote:
so why try faking it?
Because sometimes you're using some tools, designers, wizards. And who
knows why they will ask for ReadUncommitted. And if you can't change
it, you'll be stuck.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com
