[Firebird-net-provider] using fb 2.5 and 3.0 embedded concurrently

2016-06-22 Thread Ralf Jansen
Hi, I'm in the process of migrating a large .Net application that is using firebird embedded 2.5 to 3.0. To get a smooth transition with a minimum of user hassle and downtime it would be helpful to have both client libraries (2.5 and 3.0) used concurrently in the same process. There are

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] using fb 2.5 and 3.0 embedded concurrently

2016-06-22 Thread Ralf Jansen
Seems to work in a short test. I will go that route further and see if there are some major stumbling blocks in the way (the provider's connection pooling for example). -Original Message- From: Jiří Činčura [mailto:j...@cincura.net] Sent: Mittwoch, 22. Juni 2016 11:12 To:

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Zlib library

2016-08-02 Thread Ralf Jansen
I would still like to see a shim and as one default implementation you could use SharpZibLib. Von: Jiří Činčura [mailto:j...@cincura.net] Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Juli 2016 15:05 An: firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net Betreff: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Zlib library Umm, yeah. Massive 9

[Firebird-net-provider] Error code 335544332 invalid transaction handle (expecting explicit transaction start)

2016-08-04 Thread Ralf Jansen
I recently switched from an older provider version (2.x something) to the current 5.0.5.0 build and use it in an embedded scenario. In that process I also switched from FB 2.5 to 3.0 I have stability problems when the system gets under heavy load with concurrent transactions/connections. I

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Error code 335544332 invalid transaction handle (expecting explicit transaction start)

2016-08-04 Thread Ralf Jansen
Thanks Thomas, >From where to get that? The snapshot build on firebirdsql.org is older than >the tracker case. So the fix is presumably not in there. I could get the master from Github but the recent commit history doesn't look like CORE-5307 has been fixed (at least it's not stated directly).

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Error code 335544332 invalid transaction handle (expecting explicit transaction start)

2016-08-04 Thread Ralf Jansen
Tried the snapshot and can't reproduce the problem currently. I presumably misinterpreted the tracker info's. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ralf Jansen [mailto:ralf.jan...@mailstore.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. August 2016 14:55 An: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] using fb 2.5 and 3.0 embedded concurrently

2016-07-07 Thread Ralf Jansen
I call FbConnection.ClearPool before backup. So there shouldn't be any 2.5 connections to that database still hanging around. The backup restore I do is inplace. I have replaced the fdb database in its original location (2.5 before a 3.0 version afterwards). I assume if I had 2.5er connections

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] using fb 2.5 and 3.0 embedded concurrently

2016-07-07 Thread Ralf Jansen
or firebird itself with a 60 seconds timing? -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ralf Jansen [mailto:ralf.jan...@mailstore.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Juni 2016 12:36 An: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers <firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net> Betreff: Re: [Firebi

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] using fb 2.5 and 3.0 embedded concurrently

2016-07-07 Thread Ralf Jansen
connection will throw a ~connection shutdown~ Exception after that state is reached. It is not dependent to a certain database. Feels more like the hole embedded Firebird client is in a shutdown state then :( -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ralf Jansen [mailto:ralf.jan...@mailstore.com

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] using fb 2.5 and 3.0 embedded concurrently

2016-07-11 Thread Ralf Jansen
(); -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ralf Jansen [mailto:ralf.jan...@mailstore.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. Juli 2016 18:19 An: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers <firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net> Betreff: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] using fb 2.5 a

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] About GUIDs in Firebird

2017-01-10 Thread Ralf Jansen
I may have missed the point or I'm not aware of all the details here but trying to use a GUID in its string representation is a failure by itself. I see no benefit in making something work that isn't advisable in the first place. Like trying to move a datetime as string to the db and hoping it

[Firebird-net-provider] [FB-Tracker] Created: (DNET-688) FBScript thinks that a comment at the end of a script file is a valid command

2016-07-07 Thread Ralf Jansen (JIRA)
Issue Type: Bug Components: ADO.NET Provider Affects Versions: 5.0.5.0 Environment: Win8.1, VS2015, Net 4.5.1, Firebird Provider build from source not taken from nuget Reporter: Ralf Jansen Assignee: Jiri Cincura Example Script: /* Pre

[Firebird-net-provider] [FB-Tracker] Created: (DNET-705) FBStatistical does not like pathes to database with non ascii characters in it

2016-10-05 Thread Ralf Jansen (JIRA)
provider Issue Type: Bug Components: ADO.NET Provider Affects Versions: 5.0.5.0 Environment: Windows 10 (de locale), Visual Studio 2015, Firebird Embedded 2.5.6 and 3.0.1 Reporter: Ralf Jansen Assignee: Jiri Cincura Trying to use FBStatistical