> I would still like to see a shim
Honestly. If somebody sponsors my time, I'll do it. Else I'll take the
straight to the finish approach.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
--
> Looks like SharpZipLib it is. I checked right now and it's using MIT
> license now, which should allow to take a piece of code and use.
I was wrong. They use GPL. So it's going to be code from Ionic. I doubt
most developers care as long as it works. :D
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT
I would still like to see a shim and as one default implementation you could
use SharpZibLib.
Von: Jiří Činčura [mailto:j...@cincura.net]
Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Juli 2016 15:05
An: firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Zlib library
Umm, yeah. Massive 9
Umm, yeah. Massive 9 votes.
Looks like SharpZipLib it is. I checked right now and it's using MIT
license now, which should allow to take a piece of code and use.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
--
OK. Vote here http://goo.gl/X4hCxG . Not sure we'll get enough votes,
though, to make it significant for decision. Arguments are welcome as
well.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
--
What NetFlow Analyzer
One thing I realized now. We might also consider is future .NET
Core/CoreCLR support...
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
--
Attend Shape: An AT Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT Park in San
Francisco, CA
> There is also ILMerge option to include dependency in a package.
Somebody would probably need to study the license, whether that's
allowed. Also hiding it is nice, but giving "some credits" isn't a bad
thing either (and I don't mean some line in README).
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT
> SharpZipLib looks to be more actively maintained and with clearer and
> more
> permissive licensing. It's a dependency of most of my project anyway so I
> would not mind it.
Kind of. On the other hand when it's done, like *done*, there's not much
to change.
> An alternative to an external
There is also ILMerge option to include dependency in a package.
On 21 June 2016 at 11:02, Gerdus van Zyl wrote:
> SharpZipLib looks to be more actively maintained and with clearer and more
> permissive licensing. It's a dependency of most of my project anyway so I
>
SharpZipLib looks to be more actively maintained and with clearer and more
permissive licensing. It's a dependency of most of my project anyway so I
would not mind it.
An alternative to an external dependency is an intree copy with unnecesary
bits(eg. bzip2,tar) removed.
Out of curiosity why is
10 matches
Mail list logo