You should have 137, 138 and 139 ports open as well, as the " Network
Neighborhood" is using netbios-ns and netbios-ssn to resolve names. The other
way is to set the\windows\system\hosts file on your win95 boxes.
Cheers
Emil Tchomonev
SysAdmin
Alexandra Group
"Espinola, Micheal" wrote:
No I don't but I am arrogant enough to think the ability to eliminate
firewall pretenders is easy. (For those of you that understand this at a
much deeper level - I am not oversimplifying in the examples I give -- I
just don't yet understand it like you do.)
Does it protect you at the transport
Hi all.
I'm using RH linux 6, and i'm trying to make the SATAN prog
to work.
The problem i encountered with is when im' running it , it tries
to communicate with my localhost in some port, which doesn't open.
It writes (SATAN ver1.1.1) - Make HTTP connection to naor:1151.
then it freeze.
The
ya man, that's by default, you can still change it manually though.
that's arp-ip features which are being used. look it up, because it'd take
too much time to answer that, and since i'm at work, i have full load of
shit to attend to.
peter
From: Ben Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'peter pajak'
No desire receive messages !!!
Thank you ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
De: Jen[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada:Terca-feira, 27 de Julho de 1999 23:58
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto:Cheap firewalls
Thanks to everyone for the suggestions. I think we've decided to go with
No desire receive messages !!!
Thank you ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED][SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada:Quarta-feira, 28 de Julho de 1999 07:51
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto:Reviews of Proxy 2 and Bordermanager
Does anyone know of some reviews for
No desire receive messages !!!
Thank you ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
De: eric[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada:Terca-feira, 27 de Julho de 1999 22:52
Para: David Lang; 'Firewall list'
Assunto:Re: kill -9 the portscan thing.
David Lang wrote:
and what do you then do
No desire receive messages !!!
Thank you ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
De: Randall, Mark[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada:Terca-feira, 27 de Julho de 1999 14:20
Para: Dave Gillett
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto:RE: trial charges
I *do* think it's irresponsible to
you can try the /etc/defaultrouter file, edit it and put ip addresses of
your two routes. it won't notify you when one of the routes is down but
it'll continue to send the packet through the second avaiable.
peter
From: "Martin, Kevin" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'fw-1-mailinglist'" [EMAIL
No desire receive messages !!!
Thank you ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
De: Randall, Mark[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada:Terca-feira, 27 de Julho de 1999 14:20
Para: Derek Martin
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto:RE: trial charges
To me, this is the same as dialing a
No desire receive messages !!!
Thank you ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
De: Joel Gridley[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada:Quarta-feira, 28 de Julho de 1999 05:41
Para: Sujeet Nayak
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto:Re: what is a targa attack?
Targa is freeware. It
Do you have some firewall or othere packet filtering device that blocks
packets on your loopback device. SAINT (which is based on SATAN and which
SARA is based on) spawn it's own Web server to handle the HTML-based
scanning. If HTTP connections to the local host are blocked, then it won't
work.
No desire receive messages !!!
Thank you ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
De: Randall, Mark[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada:Terca-feira, 27 de Julho de 1999 19:10
Para: 'Gene Lee'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Assunto:RE: kill -9 the portscan thing.
My point is that anybody
No desire receive messages !!!
Thank you ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
De: Dave Gillett[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada:Terca-feira, 27 de Julho de 1999 19:19
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto:Re: trial charges
On 27 Jul 99, at 17:50, David Getchell wrote:
Comments? Is
No desire receive messages !!!
Thank you ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
De: stbrow - Stacy Brown[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada:Terca-feira, 27 de Julho de 1999 15:39
Para: 'Randall, Mark'; Dave Gillett
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto:RE: trial charges
Prioridade:
No desire receive messages !!!
Thank you ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
De: Spikeman[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada:Quarta-feira, 28 de Julho de 1999 06:04
Para: Sujeet Nayak
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto:Re: what is a targa attack?
i would guess its the targa.c
No desire receive messages !!!
Thank you ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
De: Gene Lee[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada:Terca-feira, 27 de Julho de 1999 18:52
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto:Re: trial charges
[This is a bit-off topic to the
No desire receive messages !!!
Thank you ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
De: Paul D. Robertson[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada:Terca-feira, 27 de Julho de 1999 21:51
Para: Ron DuFresne
Cc: David Getchell; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto:Re: trial charges
On Tue, 27 Jul
No desire receive messages !!!
Thank you ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
De: Ron DuFresne[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada:Terca-feira, 27 de Julho de 1999 16:32
Para: Mark Hayes
Cc: 'Matthew G . Harrigan'; 'Derek Martin'; 'Paul D. Robertson'; 'P L
STEINBRUCH'; 'Paul L.
No desire receive messages !!!
Thank you ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
De: W Joel Gridley[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada:Quarta-feira, 25 de Agosto de 1999 03:07
Para: David Watson; Firewalls List (E-mail)
Assunto:Re: FW: DNS ..where to put..DMZ or ...
What RFC covers
No desire receive messages !!!
Thank you ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
De: Dave Gillett[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada:Terca-feira, 27 de Julho de 1999 15:48
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto:RE: Proxy/DNS in a DMZ
On 27 Jul 99, at 8:22, HOFMAN, Mark wrote:
sorry I'd
No desire receive messages !!!
Thank you ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
De: Matthew G . Harrigan[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada:Terca-feira, 27 de Julho de 1999 15:23
Para: Joel Gridley; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Assunto:Re: Managed Firewall Service
No desire receive messages !!!
Thank you ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED][SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada:Terca-feira, 27 de Julho de 1999 19:14
Para: Gene Lee
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto:Re: trial charges (off topic)
Your
No desire receive messages !!!
Thank you ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
De: Matthew G. Harrigan[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada:Quarta-feira, 25 de Agosto de 1999 01:23
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto:Re: incident recovery
My guesses are:
* Sniffer
No desire receive messages !!!
Thank you ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
De: Bryan McDonald[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada:Quarta-feira, 28 de Julho de 1999 05:00
Para: Aaron C. Springer
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto:ADMIN: FIREWALLS [RE: Call for self-Moderation]
No desire receive messages !!!
Thank you ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
De: Michael F. Dick[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Responder: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada:Terca-feira, 27 de Julho de 1999 19:04
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto:RE: trial charges
Well, I scan my
No desire receive messages !!!
Thank you ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
De: Bayard G. Bell[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Responder: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada:Terca-feira, 27 de Julho de 1999 17:25
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto:Call for self-Moderation
Arquivo:
No desire receive messages !!!
Thank you ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
De: David Getchell[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada:Terca-feira, 27 de Julho de 1999 14:50
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto:Re: trial charges
On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 14:41:35 -0400 Dave Thompson wrote:
No desire receive messages !!!
Thank you ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
De: Ron DuFresne[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada:Terca-feira, 27 de Julho de 1999 16:53
Para: David Getchell
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto:Re: trial charges
On Tue, 27 Jul 1999, David Getchell
To All:
Is everyone receiving these "Evandro"
messages? I've received over forty just today!
I've sent e-mail directly to him to cease and desist!
the idic man
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
No desire receive messages !!!
Thank you ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED][SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada:Terca-feira, 27 de Julho de 1999 18:13
Para: Ron DuFresne
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto:Re: trial charges
Internet
/\
No desire receive messages !!!
Thank you ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
De: Gene Lee[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada:Terca-feira, 27 de Julho de 1999 17:27
Para: David Getchell; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto:Re: trial charges
I have no convenient way of locating the PC from
"Smith, Lars" wrote:
I think at this point, even the whitehats are thinking of DoS'ing his mail
server.
I forwarded copies of all of them to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Just wanted to
make sure they understood the problem.
Eric Johnson
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
you realize of course, that every time you complain about him instead of
writing about firewalls, you create another annoying message from him that
we otherwise wouldn't have to deal with :)
At 01:01 PM 8/26/99 -0700, you wrote:
How do we get this person removed from the list?
-Original
On Tue, Aug 24, 1999 at 09:36:00AM -0600, Mark Arroyo wrote:
I need a VPN solution for my company. Cost of the solution is a factor. Can
Why don't you have a look at Free/SWAN. I don't have the URL on hand at the
moment but a five minute search at any search engine should give it to you.
It
No desire recieve automated replies!!!
- Original Message -
From: Evandro Braz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dave Gillett [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Randall, Mark'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 1999 8:44 AM
Subject: RE: trial charges
No desire
Is there a software package for NT? All my searching has only found Perl
compiled programs. I cannot seem to figure out how to get ActivePerl to
work.
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
Here is one Bryan will like.
Me too..
acs
On 26-Aug-99 Robert L. Moore wrote:
To All:
Is everyone receiving these "Evandro"
messages? I've received over forty just today!
I've sent e-mail directly to him to cease and desist!
the idic man
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to
Linh Khuu
IBM Global Services - Network Services
Gaithersburg 182/1G112
Phone: 301-240-7192
Pager: 1-800-759- Pin# 8710274
E-mail address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
If the routers are Cisco, use HSRP. The Sun box default route will point to the HSRP
address. The way it works is as follows:
rtrA192.168.10.1
rtrB192.168.10.2
HSRP192.168.10.3 - rtrs A and B will route traffic while listening on .3
Good luck
-Original Message-
From:
Ouch!
We have been trying to get several Nokia IP440's to do asymmetrical load
balancing using Nokia's OSPF implementation It turns out that when these
boxes are running on fast Ethernet they do not share state information
quickly enough so that when the ICMP reply packets come back, a
I think at this point, even the whitehats are thinking of DoS'ing his mail
server.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 1999 5:48 AM
To: David Watson; Firewalls List (E-mail); 'W Joel Gridley'
Subject: RE: FW: DNS ..where to
Hi,
Currently, I'm using Gauntet FW running on Solaris 2.6 to protect the on-line payment
server.
Since transactions to the server is extremely critical, so the server and the firewall
can not affort to be down even for a second (down time = money lost).
Is there any solutions to avoid
On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 04:20:12PM -0700, Corbett Waddingham wrote:
Hello,
Recently, the subject of using quad ethernet cards on firewalls was brought up
here at work. One person was convinced that this is a Bad Thing(c), because
someone could compromise the card and get access to the
I have asked him/her/it to stop earlier today, after the first couple
messages.
/Vincent Power
Transport Administrator
-Original Message-
From: Robert L. Moore [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 1999 2:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Evandro Annoyances!
On 26 Aug 99, at 17:39, eric wrote:
"Smith, Lars" wrote:
I think at this point, even the whitehats are thinking of DoS'ing his mail
server.
I forwarded copies of all of them to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Just wanted to
make sure they understood the problem.
Eric Johnson
I wonder
On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Emil Tchomonev wrote:
You should have 137, 138 and 139 ports open as well, as the " Network
Neighborhood" is using netbios-ns and netbios-ssn to resolve names. The other
way is to set the\windows\system\hosts file on your win95 boxes.
If I recall on win95 boxen
I'm just filtering him to /dev/nul...
At 01:01 PM 08/26/1999 -0700, David Watson wrote:
How do we get this person removed from the list?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 1999 5:48 AM
To: David Watson; Firewalls List
You can use a couple of routers to put the second gauntlet "off to one
side". Then it works as two independent firewalls with the second one being
slightly less likely to get packets (more expensive route). The sites I've
seen it setup on it works without a glitch - better than the problems you
Hi ,
We are using Gauntlet firewall version 4.0a on BSD 3.0 .
From past one month I am getting the below message on console
===
kernel: de1: enabling 10baseT port
kernel: de1: transmission timeout
kernel: de1: enabling 10baseT port
kernel: de1: transmission
50 matches
Mail list logo
