Pardon the unsolitited comment but... the original question was:
Does anyone know why Firewall-1 for NT recommends installing the
software on
a workgroup instead of a domain(member server)? If so, won't I
have to setup
separate accounts for each user? I'm planning on a DMZ with three
NIC
Pardon me
In release 5 of the PIX software, you got IPSec VPN compability and dont
need any hardware card at any end. Version 5 was released like a week ago
or something.
The IPSec compability is very good. PIX workes as a branch office
connection to a lot of other (IPSec) VPN boxes. And the
Try here:
http://129.105.116.5/fravia/howtosea.htm
and here:
http://packetstorm.securify.com/archives.shtml
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Weijie Zhang wrote:
Hi, Experts:
Newer to firewall. Would you please teach me in plain language(is it
possible? I have some working knowledge of TCP/IP.) (if
Jeff Younker wrote:
He's receiving ICMP 'administratively prohibited' messages in response to
traffic from his machine. These ICMP messages could be generated by the
netbios services encapsulated in TCP/IP. (Ports 137, 138, and 139 as I
recall.)
I thought that disabling the bindings on
Maybe a simple question:
I have a NT box running NT4.0 workstation.
IP forwarding is enabled on it.
I have installed an NIC and an ISDN card (to connect to my
Internet provider).
Is it possible to use that NT box as a router between my
firewall and the Internet ?
May need additionnal
Let me qualify that question...
I need to keep up with the following:
Firewalls
Intrusion Detection
Virii and anti-virus software
Hacker and Cracker activity
Anything and everything else security
I need show names, dates and web sites.. Please no
The really annoying thing is the Cable Companies consistently claim they do
block this traffic.
My experience is that you can get it blocked on your local segment by
calling them up and complaining.
Pretty sad.
-Original Message-
From: Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday,
I like:
The Internet Security Conference. http://tisc.corecom.com/
The conference is going on right now. Next one in May 2000 in San Jose.
See the site for info on what is going on this week to get an idea of
its flavor.
SANS conferences, especially the network security conference.
The NT workstation's inside nic has no legal
address(192.168.x.x), and its ISDN card has a dynamic address (changed at each
dialing to the provider).It's just a PC dialing to the provider to receive a
temporary legal address.
The firewall behind that box is a Raptor V6, and
does NAT
Probably want you want to do is disable the WINS client on the interface that's
connected to the cable modem's network. If you have IP forwarding enabled, you might
want to disable that as well (unless you're actually using it, of course).
You might also be able to figure what what the
It is possible to use NT Workstation as a router. Just enable IP forwarding and
set up your routing table.
What type of firewall are you using?
"Dominique THIRY" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/13/99 09:36:27 AM
To: "FIREWALLS" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Rob Walker/SV/AUS/HARCOURT)
Addendum...
Also, the Usenix Security Symposium, especially if you like hearing about
current research.
Fred
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
New Horizons learning center offers a Certified Internet Security Professional
certification. It's supposedly globally accepted. Check them out at
http://www.newhorizons.com
Javier Romero [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/13/99 02:30:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Rob
Eric wrote:
Of course, what I really don't understand is why the cable company
doesn't block the netbios traffic wherever and whenever possible.
Bite yo' tongue! The last thing we need is some big corporation restricting
our access to the Internet. Or, for that matter, anyone restricting
I recently attended WebSec '99 in San Francisco in August. It's done by the MIS
training institute and it was simply amazing. One week of really excellent info
including penetration testing and firewall hardening. The people who taught the
classes were from the DOD, Verisign, and other major
I am using IPChains on a Linux box but would like the advantages of stateful
packet filtering. Is the best package to use IPFilter or ..?
Thanks,
Ben.
Ben Conrad
NT Administrator, NOS Team
GTE Internetworking
617.873.5146
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 04:38 PM 10/13/99 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've heard that their is a SANS NT conference that covers Windows NT security.
Do you know anything about it?
A writeup should be on the SANS page. SANS usually does good stuff, though
I have never gone to the NT training. They have
There are plenty of resources. A well respected web site to peruse is
http://www.sans.org
At 02:30 PM 10/13/1999, Javier Romero wrote:
Hi folks
Do u know courses about Security Management, Security Assessment,
response to hacking, or another one?
TIA
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to
On 13 Oct 99, at 16:36, Dominique THIRY wrote:
Maybe a simple question:
I have a NT box running NT4.0 workstation.
IP forwarding is enabled on it.
I have installed an NIC and an ISDN card (to connect to my Internet provider).
Is it possible to use that NT box as a router between my firewall
Check out http://www.gocsi.com .. .conference with seminars ... starts 15 NOV
Rory
Javier Romero [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/13/99 03:30:49 PM
I've heard that their is a SANS NT conference that covers Windows NT security.
Do you know anything about it?
Frederick M Avolio [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/13/99 02:29:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Rob Walker/SV/AUS/HARCOURT)
Subject: Re: What is the best
Hallo,
I have a RH 6.0 box stripped bare, with FWTK installed. IP-forwarding=NO.
IP-firewalling=YES.
It is dual-homed, and it will be subnetted (Class C split into 2).
Currently it is not because I am attempting to configure it correctly before
I drop it in the network perimeter it is destined
1 - Are there any sites on the Internet that cann give me a detailed listing of
the controls that are available or that should be enabled on a Checkpoint
Firewall?
2 - Any suggestions on where I can configuration information on how to seriously
limit access to the content going through this
Sorry for making you upset.
Of course you must know this stuff, since CheckPoint and FW-1 is one of
your largest products. I'm so sorry.
On Wed, 13 Oct 1999, P. Capelli wrote:
Lars Kronfält wrote:
IMHO the PIX beats FW-1 in remote admin to. You can use the VPN client,
tunnel in to the
Dear Listmembers!
Sorry for crossposting. The Call for Participation below
might be of interest for you. To register, please visit
http://www.cqre.net . You might want to note that the
early bird registration period already expires on Oct. 22,
which is less than two weeks from now.
I would
25 matches
Mail list logo
