At 01:35 12/05/01 +, Hafida Fouta wrote:
I am looking for a DMZ firewall. We will use it in NT network.
I want to see the price of checkpoint fw. I really need to know it as soon
as possible.
Thank you very much for your reply
Hafida
Hafida,
Given where you are, you have the choice between
Hafida,
I am a moroccan myself.
I can help you if you can tell me what is your budget and your
preferences. If you want to choose an open source solution,
the price may be almost zero (you'll still need to buy the hardware!).
just tell me what you exactly need.
mouss
At 22:41 11/05/01
At 02:22 13/05/01 -0500, Martin Hoz wrote:
Miller, Ari ha escrito:
Has anyone had the opportunity to convert a Checkpoint firewall to
PIX? I was hoping to leverage other people's experience with this
conversion -- this particular Checkpoint firewall has about 45
explicit rules, but
On Mon, 14 May 2001, mouss spewed into the ether:
why would you think linux+[iptable|ipchains] wouldn't be?
and if you are lookin for a GUI with this, there are GUIs available to
configure ipchains and iptables firewalls.
Devdas Bhagat
--
Bingo, gas station, hamburger with a side order of
Hafida,
Believe it or not but the best way to get a price quote on a firewall
is to call a salesperson from the firewall company in question and ask
them. This is NOT the firewall sales channel mailing list. This is a
technical list and I see a lot of people asking pricing related
* mouss sez:
: Checkpoint is a hard choice, since there has been rumours claiming they
: work for the mossad. While there is no proof for that (I guess you didn't
: think they are so dumb to prove anything suspicious), Checkpoint
On a side note, what happened to all that suspicious traffic
Is it true that NetBSD is better than openbsd and freebsd when it comes to
security? I thought, it was openbsd.
Coz I'm planning of setting up a new firewall.
Thanks.
Neil
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe firewalls in the body of the message.]
Ok in other parts of the network i don't have any
problem with doing file xfers via netbios (with nt4.0)
over a PIX using NAT with a global (dynamic nat). But
on this one pix (same code rev) I can only have one
file xfer per src ip. So i nat everyone to 1 address
and this is what i see.
Host A
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Ronneil Camara wrote:
Is it true that NetBSD is better than openbsd and freebsd when it
comes to security? I thought, it was openbsd.
while neither netbsd nor freebsd are slouches when it comes to security
(though freebsd seems to have more core and kernel security
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Ronneil Camara wrote:
Is it true that NetBSD is better than openbsd and freebsd when it comes to
security? I thought, it was openbsd.
Coz I'm planning of setting up a new firewall.
Yeah, the netbsd people upgraded the magic security powder module to
version 2.5 in the
Please go away with that stuff ;-)
I can't hear it anymore...
Instead take a 'grep' over an archive of this list.
cu
Jorg
--
Jörg Marx
secunet
Security Networks AG
Ammonstraße 72 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01067 Dresden
-Original
At 11:36 14/05/01 -0400, Jose Nazario wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Ronneil Camara wrote:
Is it true that NetBSD is better than openbsd and freebsd when it
comes to security? I thought, it was openbsd.
while neither netbsd nor freebsd are slouches when it comes to security
(though freebsd
At 08:04 14/05/01 -0700, Jonas Luster wrote:
* mouss sez:
: Checkpoint is a hard choice, since there has been rumours claiming they
: work for the mossad. While there is no proof for that (I guess you didn't
: think they are so dumb to prove anything suspicious), Checkpoint
On a side note, what
mouss ha escrito:
At 02:22 13/05/01 -0500, Martin Hoz wrote:
Miller, Ari ha escrito:
Has anyone had the opportunity to convert a Checkpoint firewall to
PIX? I was hoping to leverage other people's experience with this
conversion -- this particular Checkpoint firewall has about 45
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Martin Hoz wrote:
[..]
why would you think openbsd+ipf wouldn't be?
I never said that. But AFAIK; openbsd+ipf does not have a GUI:
why would you think linux+[iptable|ipchains] wouldn't be?
Ditto.
Hy,
I don't know why you are claiming that there are no GUIs
I need some help. Our customer's web has been hacked. Do you know of any
solution to secure ftp service on a win2000?
I just don't know if there is an ftp over ssh on win2000? Is there such?
Problem with this is, it's not possible to install a firewall now. The
server is situated on the ISP. I
Achim Dreyer ha escrito:
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Martin Hoz wrote:
[..]
why would you think openbsd+ipf wouldn't be?
I never said that. But AFAIK; openbsd+ipf does not have a GUI:
why would you think linux+[iptable|ipchains] wouldn't be?
Ditto.
Hy,
I don't know why you are
Ronneil Camara wrote:
I need some help. Our customer's web has been hacked. Do you know of any
solution to secure ftp service on a win2000?
I just don't know if there is an ftp over ssh on win2000? Is there such?
sftp? cygwin (cygwin.com) ported openssh-2.5.2-p2 (iirc) to win32 which
hi ya devdas
the question is which gui .. or automated script...
so many to pick from
http://www.linux-sec.net/firewall.gwif.html
- seems to also depend if you are config'ing 1, 2 or 3 nics
have fun linuxing
alvin
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Devdas Bhagat wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2001,
About a week ago, we migrated a big chunk of network from an outdated
configuration where the mail system was protected by a 3620 with NAT and no
port-blocking to a PiX 520 running 5.3. The IP address remained the same,
of course, both internally and externally, and we (duh) opened port 25 for
Hi,
I've been running Checkpoint FW-1 on a FreeBSD/Nokia box for a while here,
and I while I like the product technically, I think I am finally at that
point where I am fed up with the support/services/reseller infrastructure
behind it and would like to look at other options.
At the time that I
Make sure you're rejecting (as in sending a RST) incoming ident (TCP 113)
not silently discarding it?
A very common scenario for outbound mail is that the server you're
connecting to sends an ident query, and waits for a reply. Often, if the
firewall silently discards the query (or even sends an
If you would accept an application gateway firewall, Raptor fits most of your criteria
(even to point that its development headquarters in Massachusetts).
Look at http://www.firetower.com for a company that supports Raptor and some Raptor
listserver archives. They are in Massachusetts as well.
From: Ronneil Camara [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:web site hacked
Date sent: Mon, 14 May 2001 16:49:54 -0500
I need some help. Our customer's web has been hacked. Do you know of any
solution to secure ftp
Anybody have experience with radware or foundry's
firewall load balancers?
I need something that works with an existing old
application layer firewall.
Foundry has a solution that looks like it is for
packet filtering firewalls.
Does cisco have something equivalent/better?
TIA
Each of the BSD's have a key focus:
NetBSD - portability.. runs on like 38 platforms
OpenBSD - Security
FreeBSD - supports the most stuff as far as hardware and new toys.
Carric Dooley
Senior Consultant
COM2:Interactive Media
But this one goes to eleven.
-- Nigel Tufnel
On Mon, 14 May 2001,
hi ya
Each of the BSD's have a key focus:
NetBSD - portability.. runs on like 38 platforms
OpenBSD - Security
FreeBSD - supports the most stuff as far as hardware and new toys.
BSDi - commercial version ??
c ya
alvin
Carric Dooley
Senior Consultant
COM2:Interactive Media
-
[To
I can't for the life of me figure out whey anyone would want to use BSDi
with all the free OS's available. I know that's what's on the BigIP's,
but I'm not sure why.
I have played with BSDi, but I am not sure what it's forte is... if it has
one. =) I would go open-source over commmercial in
hi ya carric...
yup..ditto ... but if they insist on using coommercial sw
so be it..as long as they can mekt he right set of other choices...
and than see where the fingers go or not...
and forgot abut securebsd to add to the list
c ya
alvin
http://www.linux-1U.net .. 3-5 nics in 1U ...
IPSO is based on FreeBSD (an old version..., I am not even sure which, but
I am pretty sure it's a 3.x rev). It has been highly customized however.
I know there are all sorts of cool unsupported tools on the Nokia site.
I would not try to run TOO much crap on my firewall however. The simpler
30 matches
Mail list logo
