On 16/01/02 13:24 +0530, Prathabacimman.M wrote:
Hi,
Try configuring your mail server for relay blocking such as
authentication/ip address restriction. But this way it will your home server
users to send a spam. The best way is to block at the Firewall level like
exceeding the counts set
On 14 Jan 2002, at 17:45, Bruno Negrão wrote:
Hy all,
I'm using a linux firewall with two ethernet interfaces + iptables
+ masquerading (for windows clients) + NAT 1:1 (for application
servers).
My external interface, eth0, has 3 ip adresses (ip aliasing)
destined to make 1:1 NAT for 3
On 12 Jan 2002, at 13:54, garentsen wrote:
Hi all!
not sure whether this is the right group for firewall issues in
Linux but here goes:
I've got two ISP's providing me with 10 Mbit and 3 Mbit internet
access at home. I would like to set up my Linux (or any other OS)
firewall to
I have installed a software firewall.
Any site to check how secure the firewall is.
with http://grc.com it shows all the port as closed.
Thanks Regards
~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~
Vishal Mukherjee
IRSSL Vashi
91.022.7896004.155 (voice) 022.7896020(fax)
On 16/01/02 14:34 +0530, Vishal Mukherjee wrote:
I have installed a software firewall.
Any site to check how secure the firewall is.
with http://grc.com it shows all the port as closed.
Scan your firewall from a machine outside your trusted network using
nmap.
Repeat from the trusted network.
the best bit is the first comment posted..
i have been so blind! (4.50 / 2) (#1307)
by Anonymous Reader on Wed Dec 5th, 2001 at 06:52:13 PM PST
thank you so much for your insite into Hacking!
I myself have 3 kids all of which use all of the above programs and have all
read those
Hy Frank, thank you for this suggestion. Can you explain which is the
advantage in reseting the connection instead of simply dropping it?
- Original Message -
From: Frank Huang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Bruno Negrão' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:34 AM
Subject: RE:
If I may asnwer that question
Resetting the connection will help continue the mail process...
If you drop it... the process will continue after the connection
is timed out...
Resetting will speed up the delivery or retrieval of mail.
Regards,
Brenno
-Original Message-
Greetings!
Lauren Trinidad wrote:
Is there any way to configure the Checkpoint FW-1 without using the GUI? I
would like to remotely configure the firewall without having to open up a
browser or GUI application. I'd rather use CLI (command line interface),
FTP or TFTP of a config file,
Hi,
I am in the process of preparing a framework/parameter
list on which a firewall would be tested. Here are
some tests i can think of on which a firewall should
be tested:
1. Sustained TCP connections, thoughput number. Eg.
FTP
2. Short-lived TCP connections, throughput, number,
connection
I orginally wrote this for my boss and his home network. As I state in my original
message, I researched this but did not test a lot of the advice personally (no flames,
I warned you not to take this at full face value). This writeup covers Morpheus and
many other like-topic applications.
Hi all,
watchgguard rules does not follow checkpoints top down
approach.
Instead, it acts on the packet such that the most specific
rules will have greater precedence over the more general
rules.
e.g. if there's 2 rules.
* Any Any Deny FTP
* host1 Any Permit FTP
The sequence of the rules
Hi!
Watchguards rulebase ordering is described in the User's Guide. Look for the
Key word Service precedence
Nils
___
Firewalls mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
I recently installed a Watchguard Firebox. Originally, it appeared that all
mail from my Exchange 5.5 server was sending and receiving to all types of
mailservers. Come to find out that there are two mail servers in the
building right next door to us that we are unable to send mail to or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Cisco Security Advisory: Hardening of Solaris OS for MGC
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2002 January 16 08:00 (UTC -0800)
Summary
The Media Gateway Controller (MGC) product is installed on top of
Hi all,
Iuse Check Point VPN-1 FireWall-1
Version 4.1 and I need to connect to it from a remote host to run the fw policy
editor visual tool.
I succeed to start the tool from the remote
machine, but when it tries to connect to the server, after "Loading
EncryptionMethod" mask,I have the
On 15 Jan 2002, at 19:55, Paul D. Robertson wrote:
Many folks aren't security professionals, they're people
stuck doing a job they don't have a great grasp of, ...
IF they would go do something they're good at, maybe *I* could have
their job
DG
before i try to reinvent the wheel i thought i would
ask around about this. Is there anything out there
that will get all forms of access lists from a pix,
add them to so some kind of data base (daily). Once
received do some checks to see if anything has been
added (email alert if something has),
Radware's Link-Proof will do it without BGP. However it's $$$
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Kotakoski Harri (EXT-Novosys/Copenhagen) wrote:
In this case you could use any router capable of handling BGP (such as
Cisco 72xx series) or Firewall like Nokia IP series (starting IP440).
Cisco 72xx not
Hi,
The S-Boxes are used by the DES algorithm. The S-Box receive 6
bits as input and return 4 bits block after diffusion and
confusion functions.
All the implementations of DES use S-BOX, including Checkpoint
Firewall-1.
by
Leonardo Spalenza
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm looking for a firewall for a personal computer
using XP, any suggestions.
Please advise
Title: Message
stop!
don't move! don't spend!
XP has
a built in firewall!!!
check
it out!
Dan
-Original Message-From: Jamie
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002
10:10 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
Question
I'm looking for a firewall for a
My background is Pure/Applied Mathematics, not Computer Security or
Networking, but I do have questions concerning this portion of a previous
post which I have copy/pasted. Please read it:
CSCdv24925
It is possible to read stored configuration file from the
Storage
Title: Message
Time
to dump that CheckPoint stock
Boy, I
feel much better now that I have Microsoft selling me on security
products...
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Dan McGinn-CombsSent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002
Title: Message
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/pro/using/howto/networking/icf.asp
stealthmode316
- Original Message -
From:
Dan
McGinn-Combs
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:45
PM
Subject: RE: Question
stop! don't move! don't
ROFL,
Thats almost as funny as that Your son is a computer hacker piece
cheers..
Dan McGinn-Combs [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/16 10:45 AM
stop! don't move! don't spend!
XP has a built in firewall!!!
check it out!
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Title: Message
I hope your joking. Right? :-)
stealthmode316
- Original Message -
From:
Carl E. Mankinen
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:02
PM
Subject: RE: Question
Time
to dump that CheckPoint stock
Boy,
I feel much
yeah, i just about choked when i read that.
- Original Message -
From: Network Operations [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:05 PM
Subject: RE: Question
ROFL,
Thats almost as funny as that Your son is a computer hacker piece
cheers..
although that's jsut doing dynamic DNS.
David Lang
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Frank wrote:
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:26:34 -0800 (PST)
From: Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Kotakoski Harri (EXT-Novosys/Copenhagen)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Two ISP's
Radware's
Title: Message
I amlooking at
complimenting ourFW-1's withswitches installed with theCisco
IOS firewall feature set.
Iwould like to
implement this on 6500 switches also using layer 3 switchingso inspection
can be done on switches and not on fw nic.
We primarily would
like to reduce
Does anybody out there know of a vendor who makes a SOCKS V5 compliant firewall
appliance? Short of that, what software vendors sell SOCKS V5 server?
Thanks.
Kenneth R. Zoerner
ATT Labs
Firewall Development
M, T, Th, F (847) 407-7609
W (847) 516-8630
Cell: (847) 226-7480
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: CISCO VPN
I'm trying to set up a Cisco VPN 3000 box using NT domain authentication and having some problems.
Problem 1.
When I configured PPTP encryption required on the VPN box, I will get an 691 error User name/ password wrong message. (I'm using a 95 laptop and Microsoft VPN).
Come on now, we have our networks covered by a PII with XP as the
firewall. Works great!
-Original Message-
From: Mike Fetherston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:43 PM
To: Network Operations; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Question
yeah, i just about
ZoneAlarm Pro if you want software based
Netscreen 5 for hardware based. My preference
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
301-610-9584 voice
240-465-0323 Efax
The data furnished in connection with this
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Dan McGinn-Combs wrote:
stop! don't move! don't spend!
XP has a built in firewall!!!
check it out!
Dan
Which doesn't filter broadcasts if I recall correctly...
Paul
-
Paul D. Robertson My
This shouldn't be an issue for an ALG firewall where all the 65000+ ports are marked closed by default and you open ports only as they are needed. Checkout SecurIT Firewall, formerly known as Blackhole.
Cheers
Janbaz
From: Egdares Futch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: How
I didn't check all of these links,
http://security.norton.com/default.asp?productid=symhomelangid=devenid=sym
http://www.dslreports.com/tools (quite large as far as i know)
http://scan.sygatetech.com/
so it could be that not all of them still work. Good luck and have fun :)
Mostly these are
The NAI e-ppliance (Gauntlet) supports SOCKS. I've never been
interested enough to remember which versions though.
Cheers,
--
Ben Nagy
Network Security Specialist
Mb: +61 414 411 520 PGP Key ID: 0x1A86E304
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Hi Kenneth
Not 100% sure about SOCKS complianty firewall appliances, but the Permeo
e-border products (http://www.permeo.com/products/products.htm) may meet
some of your needs. Alternatively, (not an appliance) the IBM Secureway
firewall product supports tcp and udp apps through socks v5
Hi
Guido,
Add
your remote machine as GUI client in the Management Module and you
shoulddefine some userid who can access the policy editor to open in ro or
r/w mode.
any
more clarifications revert back
Rgds
Abdul
Sayeed
-Original Message-From: Guido Fraietta
Hmm... XP's secure... that is...If you don't mind appling patches every
week.
Oh...and that's why MS uses checkpoint. And SUN boxes for there web
servers.
Who would have ever thought.
Install XP's builtin firewall, then give us the IP address, we'll test it
for you... along w/ about 1000 of my
Hi,
yesterday when i was viewing the firewall logs through the checkpoint GUI, i
got a message Server busy cause i ran exporting logs when it was just
aroung 1500 records to a text file. After that i got disconnected from the
Mgmt server.
I could'nt use the checkpoint GUI neither to see/ modify
you could also pick any proxy based firewall out
there, and just install NEC's socks5 proxy (does cost
money)
www.socks.nec.com
--- Peter Merrick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kenneth
Not 100% sure about SOCKS complianty firewall
appliances, but the Permeo
e-border products
You can use Tiny Firewall for Nortons Personal Firewall.
--
___
Firewalls mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
44 matches
Mail list logo
