(no subject)

2002-01-31 Thread grief
Hi.. I am a beginner of network firewall. In this term ,I am begining to learn the subject. Would you pls recommend some resources about network security and firewall? Thanks in advance. bobo É̶¼ÐÅÏ¢¸Û http://www.zz.ha.cn 371Ãâ·ÑÓÊÏä

Definition of a proxy firewall

2002-01-31 Thread Don Ng
Hi all, I have been selling firewall recently and I would like to know what constitutes a more formal definition of a "proxy application firewall". I do know that there is no single clear description but probably various degrees of "proxiness" is that a word? Could anyone care to rehash an

Statefull failover in High Availabilty /clustering firewalls

2002-01-31 Thread Don Ng
Hi all, Checkpoint firewalls have intrinsic load balancing capabilities, and they have stateful failovers between the active and standby firewalls. Meaning in this case there would be no need for the client to re establish the connection via the 3 way handshake. So when packets arrive at

is this normal?

2002-01-31 Thread Jeremy
Hi, i havent seen this garbarge added to to logs before..just before the from:any ideas what it is...or is it just a random number generator thing that always happens? Jan 17 11:16:01 pop sendmail[18935]: g0HJG1J18935: from=root, size=11008, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=[EMAIL PROTECTED],

Re: FW: Win2kAdvance Server

2002-01-31 Thread Network Operations
Linux firewall = $0.00 M$ 2k box = $5000.00 do the math Marc.. Marc Sahr [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/28 3:44 PM As if using Linux as a firewall wasn't scary enough... We all know a Linux firewall is unhackable right??? Marc -Original Message- From: piranha piranha [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: VPN issue

2002-01-31 Thread Marc Sahr
Just tell your user community that it's a security issue. After all what are they doing browsing the domains and workgroups anyway? As long as net use works successfully (especially by computer name and not IP address) I don't really see an issue. It seems to me to be an education issue with

Re: FW: Win2kAdvance Server

2002-01-31 Thread Laura A. Robinson
Really? You run your firewalls on oxygen? I've only been able to get mine to run on hardware. Laura - Original Message - From: Network Operations [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 9:48 AM Subject: Re: FW: Win2kAdvance Server Linux firewall = $0.00

SQL and web across the PIX

2002-01-31 Thread Marc Sahr
2nd go-round of this problem: I still can't get my web server and my SQL server to communicate successfully (ie login to the SQL database application from the browser window) through the PIX. To reiterate the scenario: My MS IIS 5 web server is located on the DMZ, my SQL 2000 server is located

CoS, DSCP and RTP

2002-01-31 Thread Stuart Eddleston
Hi, Were thinking of deploying VoIP within our network and have been busily fighting with assorted QoS issues. One thing I haven't noticed on the list is any References to security implications from Class-of-Service in 802.1Q headers, Distinguished Services Code Points or Real Time Protocol.

Wireless carriers exploit firewall bypass

2002-01-31 Thread Hart, Kevin
Greetings, I came across this one on Infoworld's Site. http://www.infoworld.com/articles/hn/xml/02/01/28/020128hnport.xml Has anyone seen this in action? Assuming that most companies would be unable to block outbound 443 completely, one would have to block outbound 443 to the specific IP

Regarding MSN Messenger

2002-01-31 Thread ARIFUL ISLAM
Hi, When I use MSN Messenger from my Halls network. I can't seem to Send files via the File Transferring option, although I can receive them. Also the Voice chat does not work. I assume that this network is behind a firewall NAT. Could anyone tell me whether I can do ANYTHING to get round

Re: FW: Win2kAdvance Server

2002-01-31 Thread Patrick Orzechowski
At least while using linux as a firewall one can build the kernel to suit the particular needs of the situation. With msft youre stuck with the os that comes from the box, and have to wait for patches from the manufacturer. On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Marc Sahr wrote: As if using Linux as a firewall

Win2kAdvance Server: IPSEC

2002-01-31 Thread Eric Appelboom
Hi there, I suggest using Win2k IPSEC policies to protect your server. One can define very complex rules on any interface with source, destination and service. One can even create groups\object and apply to a service with permit\deny\encrypt Its perfect if one has remote servers with no other