Hi Sylvain
You can also use some kind of tunneling mechanism.
I know it exists for WebSphere, the client will call a servlet on the
application server, so in fact you are tunneling your IIOP in HTTP.
Kind regards.
Erwin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Title: Off-topic or not? Is your son a computer hacker
http://www.adequacy.org/?op=displaystory;sid=2001/12/2/42056/2147
:51
To: Riley, Steven (Security); 'Erwin Geirnaert'; Firewalls (E-mail)
Subject: RE: Off-topic or not? Is your son a computer hacker
Another example of some wannabe journalist using hype
to generate interest. First off, it's Linux not
Lunix. Second, AMD is not a third-world company
ripping off
Title: RE: Ahhh, the perks of managing government networks
blacklisting a whole class C address isn't the
solution!
I
mean, I am part of the 195.0.0.0 address-range.If everybody starts adding
thisaccess-list to their border-routers it is over with my internet
connectivity and a lot of
Title: Admin.dll
Hi
Looking into the analysis of the worm, I have some questions.
A lot happens in the windows directory, what will happen when using win 2000 or winnt? There is no such directory. Will the worm stop?
Is it possible that the changes to asp, html, exe, files are only
Title: Borderware IPSec Client
Hi guys
I'm having problems with the Borderware IPSec Client.
If I connect trough my cable provider at home, I can connect.
At work it doesn't work, although the firewall allows my PC to connect.
The fw is configured to allow IP protocol 50, IP protocol 51 and
Title: RE: Tool for Sniffer detection ?!
Check AntiSniff from the L0pht.
Erwin
-Original Message-
From: Steffen Schmalbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: donderdag 12 juli 2001 9:22
To: Firewalls
Subject: Tool for Sniffer detection ?!
Hi
Does anybody know a good tool to
Title: E-mail flooding
Hi guys
A question: a friend of mine has a problem with his mail server. It seems that a lot of mails are send from an account and they are large.
Of course the account isn't aware and the mail server has relay disabled.
How can we trace what is happening and how
2001 11:50
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: packet snooping tools for window
As I recall, the standard NT Network Monitor cannot enable promiscuous mode, whereas the one that comes with SMS can.
Erwin Geirnaert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/14/2001 08:17:12 am
For Windows you can
Title: RE: packet snooping tools for window
For Windows you can use the Network Monitor included in NT and Windows 2000.
Erwin
-Original Message-
From: Alex O'Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: woensdag 13 juni 2001 18:16
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: packet snooping
Juan
You need a hardware solution that can perform callback.
Cisco Shiva are able to do that. Amongst other products of course.
The user calls and hangs up and then the RAS calls back to the number
associated with the user in the configuration.
Erwin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Hi
Or you can use an SSL accelerator box, so that you have HTTP between the SSL
box and the webserver and HTTPS between the browser and the SSL box, in this
way you can use an IDS like Snort on the HTTP segment and this would be a
security increase.
And it's also better for the performance and
Naor
You can use S/MIME for this, create certificates using MS Certificate
Server for each manager and install them in Outlook 2000.
So they can sign or completely encrypt the mails.
Erwin
-Original Message-
From: Naor Lipa
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: 7/02/01 9:34
Subject: Auth. for
Hi list
A question:
a lot of discussions are going on about the differences between firewalls.
I think that it's very important to discuss the use of the firewall
Which firewall would you recommend to protect a website?
For example: Watchguard can be very good as perimeter firewall for
Peter,
Netstat will just list the connections to his/her PC with certain
IP-addresses.
You cannot prevent this.
If you use a proxy or NAT you can hide the IP of the internal server, I
think that this is the reason of your question?
Erwin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This tool is only for NT and Windows 2000.
You can always use Inzider or other tools.
(http://ntsecurity.nu/toolbox/)
Erwin
-Original Message-
From: Michael Thumann
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: dinsdag 9 januari 2001 15:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ping activity
platforms.
But I've read some interesting things on the list about such scanners. So
thanks Paul and Carric for your input.
Kind regards
Erwin
-Original Message-
From: Paul D. Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: vrijdag 5 januari 2001 14:49
To: Carric Dooley
Cc: Erwin Geirnaert
I also find it very amusing that for those who use the SecurityFocus pager
(we all do, don't we,
I wonder if somebody checked it for vulnerabilities ;-)) in the products
section all the security scanners are listed:
Retina, Cybercop Scanner, Internet Scanner, HackerShield and NetRecon
Enjoy your
Hi list
Anyone with some experience with the WebTrends Security Analyzer?
Or some thoughts about it?
Thanks.
Erwin
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
Hi guys
Anyone who has some comments on this?
I think that dnssniff can be used on a LAN, but on the Internet itself?
http://www.securityportal.com/cover/coverstory20001218.html
Erwin
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the
Hi list
Got this on the site of Netegrity when entering a form:
We no longer accept e-mail addresses from Hotmail, Yahoo, or AOL accounts.
Please go back and input your company e-mail address
Very nice.
Next thing you have is: I don't allow that user access because his ISP is
from the
Is there a way how you can tell which process is listening to a specific
port.
I mean you can do netstat - a to see all active ports and you can see in the
task manager which processes are running, but the link between them ?
(this way it's easy to see that a specific port is used by ICQ and not
ok, but I was talking about the NT/Win platform and not the easy *nix one
Erwin
-Original Message-
From: Angelo Neacsu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: dinsdag 3 oktober 2000 16:22
To: Catalin Braica
Cc: Erwin Geirnaert; 'Firewall Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Connections Watcher
Monitoring activity, reminds me of the joke that I received today.
It monitors the activity of your mouse, so at the end of the day you have an
activity report that your boss can use to pay you. (if you have a smart boss
he'll reduce this activity with the status report of All Advantage ;-))
Shiva LANRover?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Johnston, Mark
Sent: donderdag 31 augustus 2000 6:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DMZ and stuff
Hi,
I'm looking to install a RAS server for about 5 PSTN and 2 ISDN lines.
My question is
Hi
Tom
The
problem is between active and passive modes!
So
make sure that you use only active mode, according to your configuration this is
the only option you have to make it work.
FTP in
a browser uses passive mode!
Or
your browser uses a proxy, that can also give some problems.
Don't
you
have to save your current configuration
you can
do it with: write or copy running-config startup-config
Erwin
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of AlexandreSent: woensdag 26 juli 2000
16:17To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
Title: ISDN win98 secureID
maybe
it's a problem with the PPP configuration and has it nothing to do with the ACE
server
or
maybe you have to install the latest drivers for 98 for PPP, there were a lot of
problems with the older versions
I know
that the latter gave problems for PPTP
Erwin
Only if you're in the US or Canada :-(
BTW very easy questions!
Erwin
Apologies to all, and thanks to HML for pointing it out. The
book ofer URL
is listed here. I triple checked before sending. Watch word wrap.
Steve
http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/lm/buffer/offer/securitysolution
Hello all
I saw a website with a button where you are able to measure your bandwith
from your workstation to there server.
I am really interested how this can be done using only HTTP (I asume they
only use HTTP, because a firewall wouldn't allow incoming ICMP packets)
Or is it just a little
Just ran across (not over) a FireBox II, would anyone care to
comment on its
usefulness?
it's from Watchguard (www.watchguard.com) and it's a good firewall for its
price.
( I think it's 5000$).
It has a Linux based OS, the logging station is NT based.
You can do remote administration using
Hi
I'm looking for an article or a white paper where the difference in
security-products from different vendors is discussed on matters of
performance, 'security', price, ...
Doesn't need to be just about firewalls (that would also be very interesting
for everybody I think), may be about
Folks,
Any idea or best solution how to do the following:
1 - To have connectivity to two different isp.
2 - Be able to use only one firewall (checkpoint)
3 - One connectivity via a T1 and the second via a DSL
4 - This should be transparent to the users.
Maybe a Cisco router
33 matches
Mail list logo
