RE: SMTP through firewall

headers etc. It also blocks relaying and the like. I'm also a little more prone to trust CP than a secured M$ box on the DMZ. Luke Butcher Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Rick Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: CISCO 2600 IOS logging

the file in a windows on our monitoring station. Hope this helps somewhat. Luke Butcher Ph: 020 7524 6805 Mb: 0794 11 55545 Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Manuel Fernandes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 10:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject

RE: Ahhh, the perks of managing government networks

inbound. No complaints then about Nimda, slow server response, HTTP 500 Server errors. Just a few people claim they can't get to the website, but hey it works fine for me from inside. Must be a problem their end. Guaranteed to buy you a few days of freedom. Luke Butcher Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Ahhh, the perks of managing government networks

personal tinkering) Regards, Luke Butcher Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED] E-mail Disclaimer Nabarro Nathanson Principal office: Lacon House, Theobalds Road London WC1X 8RW Tel: +44 (0)20 7524 6000 Fax: +44(0)20 7524 6524 NOTICE This message contains confidential (and potentially legally

RE: Pix FW

this should work. Luke Butcher Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Johnston Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:36 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Pix FW Hi all, This is for those of you who work with a Pix firewall

RE: Whether a port is Firewalled or just not opened

unreachable hopefully. Regards, Luke Butcher Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Boryan Yotov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 12:19 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Whether a port is Firewalled or just not opened Hello, everybody. I'm newbie

RE: FW-1 policies

solution, I don't know how this affects what you're trying to do. Regards, Luke Butcher Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 6:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FW-1 policies Hi , Just

RE: Cisco router broadcast forwarding

answered sufficiently. Luke Butcher Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Al Saenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 6:30 PM To: 'Trevor Osatchuk'; Firewalls-Owner (E-mail) Subject: RE: Cisco router broadcast forwarding You know. I

RE: Checkpoint log forwarding. (Solution)

to work out. Hope this helps someone else. Regards, Luke Butcher Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Code Excerpt below - #!/bin/sh umask=177PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/binexport PATH message=/tmp/.message_$$if [ -f $message ]; then rm $messagefi trap "rm $message ; e

RE: PIX Logging Reporting

You could try this: http://cs.calvin.edu/~mpost89/pixlog/ I looked at it once and it is reasonable, but as the V1.0 indicate needs some more features / functionality to be of major use. Luke Butcher Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Kais Al-Essa [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: something new afoot, sweeping scans:

Title: RE: something new afoot, sweeping scans: Seeing hits from this new worm, looks like it tries circa 30 URLs. Logic looks similar to Code Red II/III, in that most hits are coming from similar class B and C networks. Not sure of payload though as we're protected. Regards, Luke Butcher

Checkpoint log forwarding.

has great potential but without this sort of thing is next to useless. Regards, Luke Butcher Ph: 020 7524 6805 Mb: 0794 11 55545 Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED] E-mail Disclaimer Nabarro Nathanson Principal office: Lacon House, Theobalds Road London WC1X 8RW Tel: +44 (0)20 7524 6000 Fax: +44(0

RE: Checkpoint log forwarding.

Title: RE: Checkpoint log forwarding. The logs go fine to the logging server as evidenced by the test, it's just the contain only whatever message I put into the User Defined alert, which is less than helpful. Luke Butcher Ph: 020 7524 6805 Mb: 0794 11 55545 Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Hacking FW-1 programs/Die Hard

looks to be a Logitech Wingman or similar. I have always found this one to be a classic. I know X has progressed but I don't think it's that far yet (also considering JP was 1993). - Luke Butcher Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Steven Pierce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent

RE: Web/CGI exploit scanner

Title: RE: Web/CGI exploit scanner Checkout a program called whisker from rainforestpuppy. google search it should be able to find a current version. Luke Butcher Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: R B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 7:18 PM

RE: Hacked@!!@!! (Off-Topic)

at the start of the begin line and the MimeSweeper is lost as to the type. Save it back out to text without the zzz's rename it .uue and open it in WinZip. Hey Presto, straight thru. MHO. Regards, Luke Butcher Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED] E-mail Disclaimer Nabarro Nathanson Principal office

RE: zone alarme and udp 44767

is Unix based so probably not much to worry about. Regards, Luke Butcher Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: MEHMET A TOLUAY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 12:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: zone alarme and udp 44767 anybody using zonealarm