Umberto,
Please see my comments in line.
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 16:30:23 -0600
From: Martin H Hoz-Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Firewall Load-balancing/Redundancy
"Wimmer, Neil T." wrote:
I was wondering what other people's experience has been with Rainfinity's
Brian Ford wrote:
Umberto,
Please see my comments in line.
Thanks Brian.
BTW, some CISCO guys over there sometime boasted to me about their
"incredibly reliable and secure embedded software", so no break-ins
could be available...
I think you got some bad info. Yes, we at Cisco hope
"Wimmer, Neil T." wrote:
I was wondering what other people's experience has been with Rainfinity's
Rainwall product. We chose it at the time because it could handle more then
two interfaces on a firewall. We tried implementing version 1.5 and seem to
be having problems making it work with
- Original Message -
From: "Martin H Hoz-Salvador" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Wimmer, Neil T." [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: Firewall Load-balancing/Redundancy
Snip...
Nope, but if your firewall is FW-1
Otto Goencz wrote:
Nope, but if your firewall is FW-1, Raptor or Gauntlet, another
choice is StoneSoft's FullCluster: www.stonebeat.com , www.stonesoft.com -
Their last version is quite good and stable. Check it out.
That depends what you'll use the StoneBeat/FW-1 combo for. For just
Nope, but if your firewall is FW-1, Raptor or Gauntlet, another
choice is StoneSoft's FullCluster: www.stonebeat.com ,
www.stonesoft.com -
Their last version is quite good and stable. Check it out.
That depends what you'll use the StoneBeat/FW-1 combo for.
For just firewall
services
that it works
fine.
Otto
- Original Message -
From: "Ben Nagy" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'Otto Goencz'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 6:32 PM
Subject: RE: Firewall Load-balancing/Redundancy
Nope, but if your firewall is FW-1, Raptor
Title: RE: Firewall Load-balancing/Redundancy
You might want to also look at the Radware Fireproof solution. It was one of the first to be Checkpoint OPSEC certified I believe. The problem is that it is located on the high availability hot standby section and not the load balance like
February 2001 20:20
To: 'Wimmer, Neil T.'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Firewall Load-balancing/Redundancy
You might want to also look at the Radware Fireproof solution. It was one of
the first to be Checkpoint OPSEC certified I believe. The problem is that it
is located on the high availability
