On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Glynn S. Condez wrote:
This linux stands as my router or gateway and below this is my servers.
does it look like this?
link1 link2
| |
\ /
Linux Box
|
|
inside network
My question is, if my links down
On 3 Apr 2002, at 8:29, Brett Eldridge wrote:
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Glynn S. Condez wrote:
This linux stands as my router or gateway and below this is my servers.
does it look like this?
link1 link2
| |
\ /
Linux Box
|
]
Sent by:Subject: Re: Load Balancing
firewalls-admin@list
s.gnac.net
ditto the moderation problem.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 08:29:43 -0800 (PST)
From: Brett Eldridge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Glynn S. Condez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Load Balancing
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Glynn S. Condez
Glynn,
I have had the same question. I have not as of yet been able to find
anyone that can tell me how it will work.
I have been advised that CISCO has equipment that will allow this to work.
Please let me know when you find out.
Steven
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On
-
From: Steven Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Glynn S. Condez [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:13 AM
Subject: Re: Load Balancing
Glynn,
I have had the same question. I have not as of yet been able to find
anyone that can tell me how it will work.
I have
]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:13 AM
Subject: Re: Load Balancing
Glynn,
I have had the same question. I have not as of yet been able to find
anyone that can tell me how it will work.
I have been advised that CISCO has equipment that will allow this to
work.
Please let me know when
Now I may have not understood you here but ..
If all you want to do is have one of the wireless connections as a backup then this is
just a routing issue.
List both routes within your routing table and weight the metrics so that by default
it leaves via one link. When/if that link drops
]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: Load Balancing
Glynn,
I have had the same question. I have not as of yet been able to find
anyone that can tell me how it will work.
I have been advised that CISCO has equipment that will allow this to work.
Please let me know when you
Subject: Re: Load Balancing
Glynn,
I have had the same question. I have not as of yet been able to find
anyone that can tell me how it will work.
I have been advised that CISCO has equipment that will allow this to
work.
Please let me know when you find out.
Steven
\) To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Smith, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
m Subject: RE: Load Balancing/HA
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Smith, Steve wrote:
I've been kicking this idea around for a while as well. I wonder how
much redundancy I get by loading 2-3 firewalls with a single FireProof
switch. It seems to move the failure point a little further outward,
that's all.
That's true of almost any
I am looking at the radware also.
Radware does L2 7
Cisco does L4 7
acs
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone care to share opinions about Radware's
FireProof switches
versus the CSS 11000 line available from Cisco?
TIA!
Chris
Chris Hastings, CCSA, CCSE
Brainbench MVP
I've been kicking this idea around for a while as well. I wonder how
much redundancy I get by loading 2-3 firewalls with a single FireProof
switch. It seems to move the failure point a little further outward,
that's all.
Many vendors advocate a Firewall Sandwich to provide HA to a firewall.
, Steve wrote:
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 15:36:14 -0400
From: Smith, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Load Balancing/HA switches
I've been kicking this idea around for a while as well. I wonder how
much redundancy I get by loading 2-3 firewalls
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Smith, Steve
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 3:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Load Balancing/HA switches
I've been kicking this idea around for a while as well. I wonder how
much redundancy I get by loading 2-3 firewalls with a single
: Thursday, May 24, 2001 12:11 AM
To: Smith, Steve
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Load Balancing/HA switches
Steve,
I know that the Sidewinder has that type of failover
option as well.
Basically there is a virtual shared IP address. The
secondary Sidewinder
keeps
Greetings!
G Anilkumar schrieb:
I would like to understand what is best way to implement an loadbalancing of
firewalls servers in an typical Internet Datacenter environments.
The typical thing is that there is no typical internet datacenter
Maybe you can give information on expected
Title: RE: Load Balancing / Gauntlet Question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Have a look at www.stonesoft.com or www.stonebeat.com They has a
software solution that requires you to have two firewalls side by
side. If you purchased Gauntlet on a per node basis instead
Thanks. I am currently favoring Stonebeat because it is a software
solution. With a product like Radware, I would need 2 boxes on each
firewall interface if I would desire true bi-directional high availibility.
I have 4 interfaces so that would equate to 8 boxes at about 14K per box
(for the
Title: RE: Load Balancing / Gauntlet Question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I would personally use a box like alteon or localdirector that does
not rely upon routing protocols but tests the box to see that it's up
and that the internet is up and running.
==DMT
: Friday, February 25, 2000 2:27 PM
To: Ryan Russell
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Load Balancing (Enough Already)
This can cause problems if you are using stateful filtering.
Products such as PIX, however, can work in a redundant fashion.
This means if one PIX falls over, the other PIX takes
Assumptions:
1)You are assigned at least one ip address from each ISP.
2)Your use of the Internet involves a range of outside addresses-
i.e. you do not primarily communicate with one outside host.
Put a router outside the firewall. The router should have one connection to
each
Folks,
Any idea or best solution how to do the following:
1 - To have connectivity to two different isp.
2 - Be able to use only one firewall (checkpoint)
3 - One connectivity via a T1 and the second via a DSL
4 - This should be transparent to the users.
Maybe a Cisco router
I would love to hear comments on this topic.
Yesterday I tried using two different firewall/routers, one hooked to a DSL
connection and the other hooked to two POTS lines with dial up accounts. I
intended to use the two firewall/routers as gateways, the DSL
firewall/router also offering DHCP
To: Firewalls Mailing List
Subject: RE: Load balancing...
I would love to hear comments on this topic.
Yesterday I tried using two different firewall/routers, one hooked to a DSL
connection and the other hooked to two POTS lines with dial up accounts. I
intended to use the two firewall
:RE: Load balancing...
The problem with two gateways at the client: The client uses the top
gateway until it can not reach that gateway. The DSL firewall/router looses
connection to the outside world but still responds at 10.0.0.150. Thus the
client thinks the path is ok even when
The only problem with Round Robin load balancing is
stickiness... What happens when you load something in
a shopping cart and the secure server goes belly up
and another one takes over.. Do you
re-authenticate...?
Robert
--- "Christopher Adams, Sr." [EMAIL
On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, It's The Zmer wrote:
The only problem with Round Robin load balancing is
stickiness... What happens when you load something in
a shopping cart and the secure server goes belly up
and another one takes over.. Do you
re-authenticate...?
For that type of
Nokia firewall running BGP. BAM!!!
Carric Dooley
Network Security Consultant
"A little inaccuracy sometimes saves a ton of explanation. "
- H. H. Munro (Saki) (1870-1916)
- Original Message -
From: Blanco, Juan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL
This can cause problems if you are using stateful filtering.
Products such as PIX, however, can work in a redundant fashion.
This means if one PIX falls over, the other PIX takes over it's
states.
However, firewalls are not for high-tech load balancing. Look
at Cisco LocalDirector and
Has anyone had any experience with load-balancing servers, in particular
BigIP from F5 labs? I'm wondering if these products are reliable and work
well behind NAT. Thanks!
Playboy used BigIP for their site, at least for the
CyberClub. After the normal initial headaches, we never had
...yes, I did it using an HA product, Stonebeat by Stonesoft. The actual
version implement
load sharing (not load balancing) capability. You can use static route (it's
the suggested solution)
instead of implement a routing algoritm (less safe), in addition since the
mac address is moved
from one
33 matches
Mail list logo
