Re: SNMP firewall management

2002-06-06 Thread Shay Hugi
Denmark Senegal - 1:1 by now... -Shay Hugi -Mpthrill.com - Original Message - From: Ben Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Shay Hugi' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 9:55 AM Subject: RE: SNMP firewall management -Original Message- From: Shay

RE: SNMP firewall management

2002-06-06 Thread Ben Nagy
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Shay Hugi Agreed. SNMP for firewall management is weak. Yay! but not for the NetGAP, and Adminiweb. it used to show stats, graphs, analaysis. change a few definitions, (interfaces management)

RE: SNMP firewall management

2002-06-06 Thread Ron DuFresne
but not for the NetGAP, and Adminiweb. it used to show stats, graphs, analaysis. change a few definitions, (interfaces management) that's it. Which is fine, and a perfectly reasonable thing to do with SNMP. Personally I don't think firewall MIBs should have anything other than

Re: SNMP firewall management

2002-06-06 Thread Mikael Olsson
Ben Nagy wrote: As I said a few times, I have nothing (much) against RO SNMP, although I'd prefer it if people managed to write their SNMP implementations better (how hard is it? You give me an OID, I give you a string. Sheesh.) On a sidenote: Having been involved in implementing an

RE: SNMP firewall management

2002-06-06 Thread Ben Nagy
-Original Message- From: Shay Hugi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] [...] thread? um... Um, did you _read_ the thread? Hello? i created this thread... Take a good look. Oh, Hello? is it? Well, I _was_ being polite, but... What I was implying is that it's obvious that being able to