resolution; they query their configured DNS server
and the DNS server performs the necessary queries, then returns a response
to the client.
Hope this helps,
Laura Robinson
- Original Message -
From: Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Sanford Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Windows XP comes in two versions- Home and Professional. Both are built on
the NT kernel. XP Home is the replacement for home Windows operating systems
such as Windows 95, Windows 98 and Windows ME (all of which were built on
DOS). XP Home is significantly limited in its capabilities with
to
the external DNS server rather than an internal DNS server, or other
traffic, as mentioned.
Laura Robinson
___
Firewalls mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
. this bandwagon can leave
without me. dos rules :-)
-Allen
- Original Message -
From: Laura A. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: d d [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 15
beer fart LOL's...
piranha...
/* My Lord Tzu, the first tao of combat is
learning retreat is a weapon
Yuen Li, Archery Sifu to General Sun Tzu */
From: Laura A. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: piranha [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Steniger
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 'Andy Jonkers' [EMAIL PROTECTED
, 2001 11:07 PM
Subject: Re: Firewall authentication W2K Terminal Server
so are these but you you like 'em..
piranha...
/* My Lord Tzu, the first tao of combat is
learning retreat is a weapon
Yuen Li, Archery Sifu to General Sun Tzu */
From: Laura A. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply
What is your DNS running on?
Laura
- Original Message -
From: Rick Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:31 AM
Subject: DNS vs. the firewall
I'm still struggling trying to get my internal DNS
server to forward requests to my ISP's DNS
There isn't, by any chance, a zone labeled . on the DNS server, is there?
If so, delete it. Also, check the root hints tab in the server properties
and see what's listed there.
Laura
- Original Message -
From: Laura A. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rick Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL
Please note that you *can* configure NAT and port filters, but Windows 2000
in and of itself should not be considered a firewall.
Laura
- Original Message -
From: Laura A. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rodel P Hipolito [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Firewalls
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday
Really? You run your firewalls on oxygen? I've only been able to get mine to
run on hardware.
Laura
- Original Message -
From: Network Operations [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 9:48 AM
Subject: Re: FW: Win2kAdvance Server
Linux firewall = $0.00
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q179442
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/reskit/en-us/default.asp?url=/
WINDOWS2000/techinfo/reskit/en-us/cnet/cnfc_por_simw.asp
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q280132
Laura
- Original Message
NAT is designed for more than just obscuring IPs, and if IPSec is in use in
this environment, it will negate the ability to use IPSec in transport mode.
Without knowing why the OP isn't using NAT, it may not be feasible for his
environment. Disallowing ICMP reply packets would achieve the
.
Whaddaya think?
Marc
Laura A. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/06/02 11:29AM
NAT is designed for more than just obscuring IPs, and if IPSec is in use in
this environment, it will negate the ability to use IPSec in transport mode.
Without knowing why the OP isn't using NAT, it may not be feasible for his
Disallow outgoing ICMP reply packets.
Laura
- Original Message -
From: Amarnath Gutta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: security [EMAIL PROTECTED]; tech
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; firewall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 1:55 PM
Subject: How to hide IP's in Trace
Hi All,
I have
Well put!
Laura
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:21 PM
Subject: Re: How to hide IP's in Trace
On 7 Mar 2002, at 0:25, Amarnath Gutta wrote:
Hi All,
I have Private IP's address in my network which I want to
Tiny Personal Firewall- http://www.tinysoftware.com
Laura
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:05 PM
Subject: Personal Firewall
Good Afternoon...
This is my first post to this list, so I'll keep it sweet and simple. I'm
DMZ.
Laura
- Original Message -
From: Robinson, Eric R. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 3:48 PM
Subject: RAS Server Location: Inside, Outside, or DMZ?
Our organization is about to deploy a dial-up RAS server. We have heard
noises that the location
I'm not gonna take you up on that bet. ;-)
Laura
P.S. Wes, aren't you supposed to be working?
- Original Message -
From: Gene Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Noonan, Wesley [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Laura A. Robinson'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 5:17 PM
instructions that
is.
Sorry - what was that? Checking before making a statement? - nah - you
don't
secure a network by doing that ...
-Original Message-
From: Noonan, Wesley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:08 PM
To: 'Laura A. Robinson'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE
a network by doing that ...
-Original Message-
From: Noonan, Wesley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:08 PM
To: 'Laura A. Robinson'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: unsubscribe
Wow. That looks remarkably like the line at the bottom of *every* single
email we
- Original Message -
From: Adrian Close [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Robinson, Eric R. wrote:
Is there a good rule of thumb for situating the RAS server? It seems to
me
that the following would be true:
3. Outside: Bad from all perspectives.
I don't think this is
A true DMZ may have a firewall between the Internet and the DMZ, as well
as between the DMZ and the intranet.
Laura
- Original Message -
From: Bill Royds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:11 PM
Subject: RE: Basic DMZ Setup
a speed bump
against a skilled, dedicated intruder.
Laura
- Original Message -
From: Clifford Thurber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Laura A. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bill Royds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: Basic DMZ
.
With that said, as I steadfastly maintain, a
firewall is merely a speed bump
against a skilled, dedicated intruder.
Laura
- Original Message -
From: Clifford Thurber
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Laura A. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Bill Royds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED
As I said, you're being pedantic. Extremely so, at this point. SANS, for
No, I'm being accurate- it's like the difference between saying The true
meaning of baud is bits per second and saying The popular meaning of
baud is bits per second. One of the statements is facutally correct, the
No, you said it was the TRUE definition.
No, I didn't. Learn to read. Everything else you typed is just more of the
same dogma and inability to *read*, so I'm finished with this discussion.
Me:
A true DMZ may have a firewall between the Internet and the DMZ, as well
as between the DMZ and the
I think that the term DMZ (de-militarized zone which is also called
no-man's land) loses its useful meaning if it is used for a segment on the
inside of a firewall. I know that it is commonly used for a semi-protected
segment on the third NIC of a firewall.
Okay, I think that perhaps there
You're a waste of bits.
- Original Message -
From: Paul Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Laura A. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Bill Royds [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: Basic DMZ Setup Questions...
On Fri, 5
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Laura A. Robinson wrote:
I gave no scenario. Are you now psychic, or just overly prone to
fabrication? Argue this topic all you want, but don't attribute to me
what
I've not said. Get over it already.
Someone's forging your mail then:
Okay, I think that perhaps
pork product; does that mean its current usage is invalid? No.
You're being pedantic.
Laura
- Original Message -
From: Paul D. Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Laura A. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Bill Royds [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 05
.
Laura
- Original Message -
From: Paul D. Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Laura A. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Bill Royds [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 7:46 AM
Subject: Re: Basic DMZ Setup Questions...
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Laura
In Laura's scenerio,
I gave no scenario. Are you now psychic, or just overly prone to
fabrication? Argue this topic all you want, but don't attribute to me what
I've not said. Get over it already.
Laura
___
Firewalls mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Questions...
Take the pointless bickering off-list please. Nobody cares.
-Original Message-
From: Paul D. Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 April 2002 03:08
To: Laura A. Robinson
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bill Royds
I think you've fallen prey to a troll.
Laura
- Original Message -
From: Florian Hobelsberger / BlueScreen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: aormygod [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 4:46 AM
Subject: Re: Annoying firewall
Hi,
i am sorry but i quite disagree
://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/troll.html
http://www.intersurf.com/~aevinc/aev2trol.htm
Laura
- Original Message -
From: Laura A. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Florian Hobelsberger / BlueScreen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; aormygod
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09
Hotmail hasn't run on FreeBSD for a looong time.
Laura
- Original Message -
From: Johannes Berth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:42 AM
Subject: Re: Microsoft gets into the security arena?
* William Stackpole [EMAIL PROTECTED] [11.04.02 17:12]:
Hotmail hasn't run on FreeBSD for a looong time.
Getting the machines that were pingable off FreeBSD
took a long time, but was completed some time ago.
But the backend servers that weren't directly reachable
took longer than that.
It has *still* been a long time since Hotmail ran on FreeBSD.
Follow the directions at the bottom of the page listed at the bottom of your
post. (http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls )
Laura
- Original Message -
From: Malkit Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 12:50 PM
Subject: unsubscibe
Can someone plase tell me why poeple like the Microsoft ISA Server?
I don't think they generally do, I'm not aware of it gaing any significant
market share, and I've rarely seen anyone using one.
I would agree that it doesn't hold the market share of some of the other,
better known
The current incantation (ISA Server 2000) has passed ICSA Labs
certification[1] as an actual firewall, and it does work. The last
two
attempts in the product line certainly EARNED such scorn- the current
implementation should probably be evaluated for function seperately-
it's
ISA is the replacement for MS Proxy, that makes it in line,
Oh, here we go again with The World According To Moses, er Paul.
MSP's
features were absorbed into ISA, that makes it in line, I'd put money on
some code migrating as well.
You need psychological help. MS Proxy is gone. ISA is
This is incorrect. ISA is *not* MS Proxy
[...] comparing a proxy to a hybrid firewall
and calling them the same thing
Hrm. If my memory serves me, MS Proxy did packet filtering
and proxying. That also classifies as a hybrid.
How familiar are you with MS Proxy? It wasn't a firewall and
the text below.
Reply-To: Laura A. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Laura A. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: snipped for privacy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Users slam Microsoft Security Analyser
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:37:07 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859
How familiar are you with MS Proxy? It wasn't a firewall
I'm willing to bet real money that the majority of the MS proxy
users used MS proxy as their only layer of defense.
And that makes it a firewall? So if I use a Windows 2000 server (1) as my
only router, it must therefore be a router?
How familiar are you with MS Proxy? It wasn't a firewall
I'm willing to bet real money that the majority of the MS proxy
users used MS proxy as their only layer of defense.
And what does that have to do with what the product was or wasn't? NOTHING.
and wasn't marketed as a firewall.
. Robertson -VS- Laura A.
Robinson threads. Take it offline and post a summary or something ;-P
-dale
___
Firewalls mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
Can one of you IPSEC gurus expound on what exactly the
DOI is in regards to IPSEC. Yes I have read the RFC
left me going u... In plain english can someone
provide me with a good working functional pragmatic
explaination. I would appreciate it.
I'm no guru, but very briefly put (and
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q272164
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Fernandes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 11:58 AM
Subject: W2K CA server an Cisco IOS
I am currently to integrate IPSEC in cisco IOS with a Windows
doesn't match, i also changed
the hashing algorithm from scep module but there again the problem still the
same.
Any ideas,
Thanks in advance,
Best Regards
Bruno Fernandes
-Original Message-
From: Laura A. Robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: quarta-feira, 17 de Abril de 2002 9:52
What, you mean the part right below this text?
To change your subscription (set options like digest and delivery modes,
get a reminder of your password, or unsubscribe from Firewalls), enter your
subscription email address:
Laura
- Original Message -
From: David Caplan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q280132
Laura
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 10:07 AM
Subject: DMZ
Does anyone know what ports are
- Original Message -
From: Paul Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Laura A. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: Replacing my old PIX Classic
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Laura A. Robinson wrote:
into your posts (1). ISA
chuckle Damn! we are awaiting to see how many broked content scanners
are going to go nuts here, sicne it's already demonstrated that 'bitch' is
so offnesive to so many It's getting to easy, not even a challenge
these days, to get a rise outta ya grin.
Ron, I know Wes personally, and I
Yes, but David is insane. ;-)
Laura
- Original Message -
From: Noonan, Wesley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Ron DuFresne' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:02 AM
Subject: RE: wireless woes in the triangle and beyond!
I have a buddy of mine
What are you using for e-mail? OE is famous for doing this when it's
decrypting. While it locks up your system, if you wait for a *really* long
time, it does actually eventually figure out what it's supposed to do.
Laura
- Original Message -
From: Pat Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
http://www.thawte.com/support/supercert/general.html
http://www.kimnet.com/secure.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/cryptography@c2.net/msg02492.html
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/archive/default.asp?url=/TechNet/archive/ie
/reskit/ie4/Part7/part7b.asp
Laura
--
Firewalls mailing list - [
I got the same thing. I figured since it told me to ditch the bad words, I
would wait for more specific instruction. ;-)
Laura
- Original Message -
From: Ron DuFresne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 4:22 PM
Subject: spam words..
57 matches
Mail list logo
