Title: RE: Ahhh, the perks of managing government networks
Maybe someone already replied, but surely it's:
access-list reject_all deny ip 210.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any
etc.
I prefer access-list blah deny ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 (webservers) applied to external router
Title: RE: Ahhh, the perks of managing government networks
blacklisting a whole class C address isn't the
solution!
I
mean, I am part of the 195.0.0.0 address-range.If everybody starts adding
thisaccess-list to their border-routers it is over with my internet
connectivity and a lot
Title: RE: Ahhh, the perks of managing government networks
Erwin Geirnaert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] spouted thusly:
Subject: RE: Ahhh, the perks of managing government networks
blacklisting a whole class C address isn't the solution!
I mean, I am part of the 195.0.0.0 address-range
of freedom.
Luke Butcher
Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Network Operations [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Subject: Ahhh, the perks of managing government networks
If you get fed up with SPAM and script kiddies just:
access-list reject_all deny ip 210.0.0.0
On 10 Jan 2002, at 16:57, Luke Butcher wrote:
Brazil seems to be making inroads into the top ten list of favoured
havens of script kiddies, and their compromised boxen.
When I tried black-holing Brazil, one of my co-workers complained
that she could no longer email with her family back
LOL, Was she a hottie? I'd probably be able to open up a /30 for her
=)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/10 1:11 PM
On 10 Jan 2002, at 16:57, Luke Butcher wrote:
When I tried black-holing Brazil, one of my co-workers complained
that she could no longer email with her family back home
DG
If you get fed up with SPAM and script kiddies just:
access-list reject_all deny ip 210.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 any
access-list reject_all deny ip 211.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 any
hmm, who next, I think I remember some BO scans from poland last week...
access-list reject_all deny ip 195.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 any
