On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Christopher Nilsson
christop...@otherchirps.net wrote:
Yep -- Most of the changes that have gone in lately have been bug fixes,
that folks have had living in personal clone repositories for a fairly long
while. But a more central next branch sounds like a
On 18 November 2010 08:35, SanskritFritz sanskritfr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:17 PM, David Frascone d...@frascone.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:46 AM, SanskritFritz
sanskritfr...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi
I'm a big fan of fish, and plan to create an Archlinux
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:09:22PM +1100, Christopher Nilsson wrote:
Yep -- Most of the changes that have gone in lately have been bug fixes,
that folks have had living in personal clone repositories for a fairly long
while. But a more central next branch sounds like a good idea. Somewhere
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Grissiom chaos.pro...@gmail.com wrote:
I think -without-xsel is good for distros. Because the pkg manager of
that distro can suggest to install xsel together with fish, which is
more cleaner way IMHO.
There is such thing as 'optional dependencies' in
I use fish daily and it seems complete
to me, I'm curious about Grissom's
comment regarding devs, what new
features would people like to see? Is
there a list somewhere?
On 18/11/2010 21:47, Grissiom wrote:
I think a new release could
attract more eyes and thus bring more users/devs.
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 07:00, SanskritFritz sanskritfr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Grissiom chaos.pro...@gmail.com wrote:
I think -without-xsel is good for distros. Because the pkg manager of
that distro can suggest to install xsel together with fish, which is
more
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.netwrote:
I can't speak to any changes in the git versions, but for the latest
release, xsel doesn't affect compiling the main program. The makefile
just extracts, builds, and installs the bundled copy unless
--without-xsel is
