This message is from: brass-ring-f...@juno.com
I hate to get involved in this discussion, but really! If the Fjord baby
is a Fjord by DNA, she should be registered. As someone pointed out, this
foal will outlive a lot of us. Her life will be more valuable if she is
registered. Isn't this why we
This message is from: Me Kint me.k...@yahoo.com
From Mary's iPad
On Mar 5, 2012, at 8:26 PM, Gail Russell g...@zeliga.com wrote:
breeding contract,
I don't have a legal mind, but I think Gail's proposal is excellent. I would
never want to own a stallion. They must be responsibly cared
This message is from: Starfire Farm starfiref...@usa.net
As a stallion owner, I had another thought regarding the situation
regarding this filly not being registered. Why are all fingers pointed
towards the NFHR? Why not the stallion owner? Whatever the facts,
whatever agreements that may or
This message is from: ruth bushnell fjo...@frontiernet.net
From: Gail Russell
This settlement agreement, I have to go back and look at previous posts,
but the above is my best guess as to how the NFHR might be interpreting a
settlement agreement signed by the parties. ...Gail
I BELIEVE it
This message is from: Gail Russell g...@zeliga.com
But, do you not agree that it is worthwhile to provide some support for the
stallion owner by asking for documentation that the breeding was paid for. My
policy proposal would, in this circumstance, avoid having to look inside the
transaction
This message is from: Amy Evers fjord...@aol.com
I am just discussing the underlying rationale for continuing to require the
tallion Owners's signature in order to get a foal registered. In the past,
hat signature was the Stallion Owner's assurance that the foal was the
ffspring of a particular
This message is from: Starfire Farm starfiref...@usa.net
I tried to send this yesterday, but it did not go through, so if there
end up being duplicates, my apologies to the list.
Though I have tried, I am unable to post to Fred's list (I can read it,
but I can't reply!). I am assuming
This message is from: Gail Russell g...@zeliga.com
NOT requiring a stallion owner's signature would be opening a BIG can of
trouble... Think about it; if just DNA was required what would stop dishonest
people from slipping their mares through the back gate so to speak? What
would protect the
This message is from: ruth bushnell fjo...@frontiernet.net
NOT requiring a stallion owner's signature would be opening a BIG can of
trouble... Think about it; if just DNA was required what would stop
dishonest
people from slipping their mares through the back gate so to speak? What
would
This message is from: Gail Russell g...@zeliga.com
I do not think it is advisable to move on, except from discussing the details
of this case anymore. The case raises issues. Now it is up to the NFHR to put
in place policies that make it less likely that they will get in the middle of
these
10 matches
Mail list logo
