Re: numbers - look for more

This message is from: Mike May, Registrar NFHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 08:56 AM 2/15/2007, you wrote: This message is from: ruth bushnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] I would imagine there are some basic ways that a horse could be tried for temperament.. I can think of a few offhand.. but maybe with some

Re: numbers - look for more

This message is from: ruth bushnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] I haven't heard the suggestion of how you do that in a conformation test yet Ruthie. Let me know I will forward the idea to the Evaluation committee. Please don't think they haven't tried to do something like this before though. OKAY,

Re: numbers - look for more

This message is from: Mike May, Registrar NFHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 02:52 PM 2/14/2007, you wrote: This message is from: ruth bushnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] How do you propose we give a temperament score on a conformation test? Temperament is scored on the Performance tests. Mike THANKS for

Re: numbers - look for more

This message is from: ruth bushnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] I would imagine there are some basic ways that a horse could be tried for temperament.. I can think of a few offhand.. but maybe with some research, putting some heads together, we could come up with a solid basic drill that might be a start

re: numbers - look for more

This message is from: Mike May, Registrar NFHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 12:25 PM 2/13/2007, you wrote: This message is from: ruth bushnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] You are so right Pat, a composite total high blue ribbon number is no guarantee for THE perfect horse anyhow. Absolutely correct Ruthie.

re: numbers - look for more

This message is from: ruth bushnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pat Writes: This is a good example of a composite score that needs to be looked at the way the evaluation system was meant to be. In more detail. Pat Holland You are so right Pat, a composite total high blue ribbon number is no guarantee