?
Thanks,
--
Olivier TRISTAN
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Le 21/10/2013 17:09, Olivier Tristan a écrit :
Hi Guys,
I'm wondering if it's possible to provide flac with the decoding buffer
address.
I'm currently doing a block aligned decoding and I'm copying all data
given by flac in the write callback to my own buffer but would like to
skip
oki doki
Flac decoding is already really fast indeed but as I'm streaming hundreds
of FLAC file from the HD in realtime,
I wouldn't mind some speed up if available :)
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 5:40 PM, lvqcl lvqcl.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Olivier Tristan wrote:
In stream_decoder.c when
://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=836824
Don't know much what would be the right fix.
Any idea ?
Thanks,
--
Olivier TRISTAN
uvi.net
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
*/
flac__utils_printf(stderr, 1, %s: WARNING:
legacy WAVE file has format type %u but bits-per-sample=%u\n,
e-inbasefilename, (unsigned)wFormatTag, bps);
AFAIK only 32bits file require a format of 3 while it's fine for 8, 16
and 24bits
Thanks !
--
Olivier TRISTAN
uvi.net
I never seen this before.
Thanks a lot.
Le 20/03/2014 16:45, lvqcl a écrit :
Olivier Tristan wrote:
I've just faced a wrong warning trying to encode a 24 bits WAV file
if(wFormatTag == 1) {
if(bps != 8 bps != 16) {
if(bps == 24 || bps == 32
Works fine.
Thanks !
Le 20/03/2014 17:42, lvqcl a écrit :
Olivier Tristan wrote:
Hi Guys,
The current trunk do not build with GCC 4.2 on OSX when compiling cpu.c
cpuid.h does not exists and __get_cpuid() is not defined
This version of GCC is required if you want to support pre 10.7 systems
,
--
Olivier Tristan
Research Development
www.uvi.net
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Le 03/12/2014 17:42, Olivier Tristan a écrit :
Le 03/12/2014 17:30, Martijn van Beurden a écrit :
Op 03-12-14 om 16:48 schreef Olivier Tristan:
Looks like I've missed the talk about this regression introduced in 1.3.1.
From
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2014-October/005146.html
ok
Le 03/12/2014 18:14, Brian Willoughby a écrit :
On Dec 3, 2014, at 8:30 AM, Martijn van Beurden mva...@gmail.com wrote:
Op 03-12-14 om 16:48 schreef Olivier Tristan:
This patch changes the settings associated with compression
levels 6, 7 and 8. With this patch, -e is no longer used
case)
but I don't want to sacrifice any decoding speed as this is the
bottleneck for me.
Thanks,
--
Olivier Tristan
Research Development
www.uvi.net
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
So I suppose this means that I cannot use FLAC to write my 16 ogg-flac
channels file
and neither read it (I was able to read a simple FLAC with ogg transport
layer) ?
Thanks !
Le 28/01/2017 à 21:43, Erik de Castro Lopo a écrit :
Olivier Tristan wrote:
This could make sense indeed.
I
uot; users are actually working with FLAC in Ogg container files.
>
> Brian Willoughby
>
>
> On Jan 27, 2017, at 12:55 AM, Olivier Tristan <o.tris...@uvi.net> wrote:
> > Thanks everybody for their answer.
> >
> > This is quite unfortunate for me, but hey, that's lif
. To change
this would require a whole new standard (or
the use of multiple grouped FLAC streams in
an Ogg container).
Regards,
Martin
--
Olivier Tristan
Research & Development
www.uvi.net
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
the file format itself, as the number of channels is
> encoded in a 3 bit field in the streaminfo metadata block.
>
> Tor-Einar
>
> Am 25. Januar 2017 16:45:32 MEZ schrieb Olivier Tristan <o.tris...@uvi.net
> >:
>>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> I know that FLAC f
Here is a patch that fixes the issue.
There are multiple way to fix it though.
Le 14/02/2017 à 15:08, Olivier Tristan a écrit :
Hi Guys,
The following code in CPU.c (line 155) won't link if you don't have
NASM code built even if FLAC__HAS_X86INTRIN is true as
FLAC__cpu_info_asm_ia32 don't
's
> even less useful. I don't see a reason to keep it.
> ___
> flac-dev mailing list
> flac-dev@xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
>
>
--
Olivier Tristan
Research & Development
www.uvi.net
___
ecx);
}
Maybe it should be an ifdef instead of an if ?
Thanks !
--
Olivier Tristan
Research & Development
www.uvi.net
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Hi guys,
Please find attached a patch that fixes the OSX build with llvm
only __asm__ is supported but GCC support both so it's not an issue using
this one AFAIK.
lvqcl can probably confirm this.
Thanks !
--
Olivier Tristan
Research & Development
www.uvi.net
diff --git a/src/libFLAC/cpu
Hi Guys,
I was wondering if it's possible to init a FLAC stream and directly
start decoding without reading any metadata first ?
I read the file numerous time and I would like to avoid this extra step
as I already have those information.
Thanks !
--
Olivier Tristan
Research & Develop
of Subset-compatible 16-bit FLAC files
is slightly increased on SSE4.1-compatible CPUs.
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
--
Olivier Tristan
Research & Development
www.uvi
Hi guys,
There is a missing return type in flac_internal_CreateFile_utf8 in case of
#if _MSC_VER > 1900 && WINAPI_FAMILY_PARTITION(WINAPI_PARTITION_APP)
I suppose there should ba a
return handle;
Thanks !
--
Olivier Tristan
Research & Developm
Le 07/07/2022 à 09:34, Martijn van Beurden a écrit :
Op do 7 jul. 2022 om 09:07 schreef olivier tristan :
> Hence even small optimization are very welcomed :)
I presume you use libFLAC directly then. Sadly there is little left to
optimize in the decoder. Below is an excerpt of the out
against the
speed gain from the removal of optimizations and for 24-bit audio this
compounds to about 10% speed loss. Numbers may vary depending on the
CPU specifics. I didn't think this would be a problem, but please
speak up (and if possible elaborate on the details) if it is.
--
Olivier
there should be a an opt in if you don't want to be included by
default but some people including me don't want to see those
optimization been removed ?
I rely a lot on decoding speed as I work on musical instrument sample
based :)
Thanks !
--
Olivier Tristan
Research & Develop
You do not talk about the SSE 4.1 version in your bench.
Have you tried this use case ?
Thanks !
Le 04/07/2022 à 19:23, Martijn van Beurden a écrit :
Op ma 4 jul. 2022 om 15:06 schreef olivier tristan :
While I can understand the rationale for manual assembly as 32
bits x86
,
is I think sufficient, but I would like to hear the opinion of people
that actually use this feature.
Kind regards,
Martijn van Beurden
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
--
Olivier Tristan
Research
27 matches
Mail list logo