Re: [flashrom] Using libflashrom from fwupd

2017-08-17 1:51 GMT+02:00 Stefan Tauner : > I personally don't like to lie to users even if they beg for it. If > flashrom does not exit it does useful stuff (of course there are some > corner cases, e.g., if hardware is broken but these cases should a) be > fixed by timeouts

[flashrom] Re: Stepping Down as Flashrom Maintainer/Developer

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 03:16:59AM +0100, Nico Huber wrote: > I regret to tell you that I won't do any further upstream flashrom work > in the foreseeable future. Compared to the last few months that won't > change much, as I didn't spend as much time on flashrom as I wanted to. Even with it being

[flashrom] One build system to rule them all

Hi everybody, I just pushed https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/46875 for review which replaces the make based build process with a call to use meson instead. The rationale is that the project is too small to warrant having two build systems. There are likely reasons left to use make (e.g.

[flashrom] Re: One build system to rule them all (Meson)

Hi Richard, calm down :-) Nobody's ripping out anything anywhere, and the only proposed code change is to rip out the Makefile in favor of meson, and it's far from settled what will happen to that patch. On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 01:41:30PM +, Richard Hughes wrote: > dropping meson would be a