Here's a cool video from adobe on using ColdFusion functionality in flex
without actually writing any ColdFusion services:
http://tv.adobe.com/watch/tech-talk-with-ryan-stewart/sneak-peek-of-proxy-ta
gs-in-coldfusion-9/
Jake Churchill
CF Webtools
11204 Davenport, Ste. 100
Omaha, NE 68154
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Shen
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 5:15 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] coldfusion and Flex?
Hi Jeff
Hi,
I am working with CF7,Flex and Cairngorm.the application works fine.
My manager want to use CF8 now, I do not have idea what I have to
change from setting up project to Flex coding etc.
I need to know the steps before I switch cf7 to cf8.
Do you have experience for this.Please give me a
to be sure.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of markflex2007
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 3:22 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] coldfusion and Flex?
Hi,
I am working with CF7,Flex and Cairngorm.the
]
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 4:39:10 PM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] coldfusion and Flex?
If you're using CF 7.02, the differences should be mimimal. The
services-config. xml filea now has things broken out into separate files,
so if you've done anything custom there, you'll
I have ran across this issue before and seem to have finally come across a
solution. The issue: say I have a CFC called Person which has a property
addressArray that is a array of Address CFCs. If the associated
Person.asobject has addressArray: ArrayCollection(); things don't
work,
I suppose it gives you the performance of struct and the advantadges of
typed/mapped objects
The properties of a CFC are NOT typed, thats the problem. We can type the
argument of a CF function, but not the property of a CFC... This means that
using properies is sensitive to errors.
Greetz
On Friday 24 November 2006 15:42, Rick Root wrote:
Why write your own, non-optimized code, to have Coldfusion return an
array of objects. Why not just return the query and let CF do the
conversion.
Because dealing with an array of anonymous objects is a pain.
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to
I realize this discussion is all related to Cairngorn, and I don't use
Cairngorn or really know what it is... but here's a question.
If a CFC method returns a QUERY, then Coldfusion uses code optimized (in
theory by Adobe engineers) in the flex connector to convert the query
object to an array
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] ColdFusion and Flex Integration - up
to 10x gain, avoid cf object creation
Some time ago i experienced with java versions of the value
objects. This also gives a significant improvement.
Greetz Erik
@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la
part de Dirk Eismann
Envoyé : jeudi 23 novembre 2006 10:29
À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Objet : RE: [flexcoders] ColdFusion and Flex Integration - up to 10x gain,
avoid cf object creation
Yes, I also noticed this.
I made a test where a cfloop is done on 2000
On Wednesday 22 November 2006 17:21, Rick Schmitty wrote:
Well yes, creating objects will always be more overhead, I should of
asked: Does java and php show such drastic differences when making the
AFAIK, Java only does objects, and PHP only does non-objects (this is why PHP
has such bonkers
Hi,
I am trying to get the phone example working, I've been following the
instructions in Coldfusion Powered Flex Phone Selector.
1. Using IIS and CFMX7 with 7.01 mystic updater installed.
2. The flex_enterprise-services.xml channel-definition has been
changed to:
endpoint
13 matches
Mail list logo
