Re: [flexcoders] FDS, VOs, and ignoring client-side properties

2006-08-24 Thread Jim Laing
2006/8/23, Seth Hodgson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Try tagging the properties that you don't want managed in your [Managed] AS class as [Transient]. This should prevent changes to them from being logged/committed. Hahaha. That does exactly what I want! Thanks, Seth!! Incidentally, is that in the

Re: [flexcoders] FDS, VOs, and ignoring client-side properties

2006-08-23 Thread Jim Laing
groups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Matt Chotin Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 9:54 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [flexcoders] FDS, VOs, and ignoring client-side properties Hmm, if you can send us a smaller example we can look but I believe that the appro

RE: [flexcoders] FDS, VOs, and ignoring client-side properties

2006-08-23 Thread Seth Hodgson
Of Jim Laing Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 11:31 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] FDS, VOs, and ignoring client-side properties Again, thanks for the suggestions. I've tried manually implementing the IManaged interface and using a custom event name (per your

RE: [flexcoders] FDS, VOs, and ignoring client-side properties

2006-08-22 Thread Jeff Vroom
PROTECTED]ups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com] On Behalf Of Jim Laing Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 10:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] FDS, VOs, and ignoring client-side properties I tried doing exactly that (dispatching the custom event in my setter) when

RE: [flexcoders] FDS, VOs, and ignoring client-side properties

2006-08-21 Thread Matt Chotin
[mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jim Laing Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 10:15 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] FDS, VOs, and ignoring client-side properties I tried doing exactly that (dispatching the custom event in my setter) when using implicit

Re: [flexcoders] FDS, VOs, and ignoring client-side properties

2006-08-17 Thread Jim Laing
Thanks for the idea, Matt. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to work. I forgot to mention that my unmanaged property needs to be bindable, and it seems that enabling binding on this property causes the DataStore to keep track of the property just like all the managed properties. Curiously, binding

RE: [flexcoders] FDS, VOs, and ignoring client-side properties

2006-08-17 Thread Matt Chotin
)] and then in the setter dispatch that event. Matt From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jim Laing Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 6:57 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] FDS, VOs, and ignoring client-side properties

Re: [flexcoders] FDS, VOs, and ignoring client-side properties

2006-08-17 Thread Jim Laing
nagedPropChange")] and then in the setter dispatch that event. Matt From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jim Laing Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 6:57 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] FDS, VOs, and ignoring cl

RE: [flexcoders] FDS, VOs, and ignoring client-side properties

2006-08-16 Thread Matt Chotin
Hmm, you might need to implement mx.data.IManaged yourself instead of relying on IManaged. IManaged extends IUID (you must have a string property uid) and IEventDispatcher (must be an event dispatcher). You will then need to implement any managed property as follows (I havent tested