From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Scott Barnes
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 8:24 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] More interesting than Zorn? - Details on Flex
2.0.
On that,
What was your
The Flex
programming model will also leverage new industry standards, suck as E4X
(ECMAScript for XML)
I assume we are talking about a flash player implementation (Flex Flash) ?
On 6/7/05, Aldo Bucchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
E4X is worth the WOOOW!
on one side it is a very smart
Id also like to see MM implement
the optional xpath functionality
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Aldo Bucchi
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 12:25
PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] More
interesting than
: [flexcoders] More interesting than Zorn? - Details on Flex
2.0.
E4X is worth the WOOOW!
on one side it is a very smart technology.
on the other, talks about Macromedia seriously committing to embracing
the ECMA standards to a broad extent. Excellent.
Check out Jon Udell's introduction
On that,
What was your punishment Gordon? were you the starbucks boy for the week? heh.
On 6/8/05, Gordon Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could also look at the E4X overview I accidentally posted to this
group a few weeks ago. ;)
- Gordon
--
Regards,
Scott Barnes
5 matches
Mail list logo
