--- On Mon, 5/4/09, Tim Ellison telli...@itsco.com wrote:
[Tim] The PA will run 50 watts RTTY without any issues.
The PA is rated as full duty cycle, 100W ICAS (intermittent
commercial and amateur service)
full duty cycle is key down all the time
from the RTTY gurus on the RTTY list.
MMTTY will NOT transmit in Reverse if your using FSK
MMTTY will transmit and receive in Reverse if your using AFSK
As MMTTY is the rtty engine in many of the 3rd party digital programs, this
would apply to us using the Flex.
One of the interesting
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Lee A Crocker lee_croc...@yahoo.com
wrote:
if you choose the right mode you will not have to choose reverse
CW does the same thing as far as following U/L band convention. I
always use CWL
You can set up profiles that store your favorite parameters and then
On May 5, 2009, at 6:22 AM, Burt wrote:
--- On Mon, 5/4/09, Tim Ellison telli...@itsco.com wrote:
[Tim] The PA will run 50 watts RTTY without any issues.
The PA is rated as full duty cycle, 100W ICAS (intermittent
commercial and amateur service)
full duty cycle is key down all the time
I know that for the 5000a it was originally (and conservatively)
stated that we Rtty'ers should stick to 50 watts output especially
during contests, etc. Same for PSK. Later on, after getting some
experience in the field, they lifted the restriction and said 100
watts was fine. I do not know what
old habits (and old fears) die hard
Every rig I've ever had said to cut power to half when in AM or RTTY mode.
So My Flex runs at less than 50watts and I just use an amp.
(even the amp 'QUADRA' I run at it's 'LOW' power setting when doing rtty and
only use 'HIGH' when chasing some needed
Not being familiar with the architecture or sources, would there be any
value in developing a 2-input, LMS-style noise reduction scheme using
the same antenna for both receivers and a small frequency offset? (RX2
would be tuned to an unoccupied noise frequency as close as possible
to the
So while they may spec it as ICAO, you can use ddutil to monitor PA
temp and
know for yourself.
I realize you are running the 5000, but has anyone found a way to get at
this info on the 3000?
73 Alf NU8I
Scottsdale AZ DM43an
___
FlexRadio
Exactly the same way you get it with the FLEX-5000; SHIFT+CRTL+I
BTW. Lets kill this thread. The content has nothing to do with the subject
line anymore.
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Alfred
Tim Ellison wrote:
Exactly the same way you get it with the FLEX-5000; SHIFT+CRTL+I
BTW. Lets kill this thread. The content has nothing to do with the subject
line anymore.
-Tim
We obviously need some temperature compensation here to deal with thread
drift
Thanks for the tip,
To all who will be attending Dayton this year:
FlexRadio Systems will be hosting a dinner and a FlexRadio forum with
presentations on the future of FlexRadio Systems products along with
one-on-one discussion groups and of course the famous Flexi Award
presentations. For additional detailed
It might be, but it is definitely in the Knowledge Center!
http://kc.flex-radio.com/KnowledgebaseArticle50371.aspx
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Alfred Green
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 5:05 PM
I made a few more clips. The effect can be spectactular or very subtle. In
40-E I found on static the source is sort of from a quadrant and so the
notching is very broad. None the less I could get about 3dB of noise
reduction. In 40-F the SWBC is dramatic. The station was very weak. If
To all staff members listening.
Well my table is set up, the antenna is installed, feedline in place,
PC acquired and loaded with recommended software.
In case you happen to have an F3K just sitting around ready to ship,
I am ready to receive it
Your waiting customer, Dave
--
It is indeed in the manual: page 133 (fig 139)
73 de Joe - AB1DO
- Original Message -
From: Tim Ellison telli...@itsco.com
To: Alfred Green n...@cox.net; flexRadio List
flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 17:14
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Temp indicator. Was, 4 days etc
Lee A Crocker wrote:
I made a few more clips. The effect can be spectactular or very subtle. In
40-E I found on static the source is sort of from a quadrant and so the
notching is very broad. None the less I could get about 3dB of noise
reduction. In 40-F the SWBC is dramatic. The
Folks
Just got PSDR running on Windows 7 RC (64 bit), I greatly appreciated
prior comments/solutions from those who have been down the W7 beta path.
Powersdr is running great, CPU utilization while listening to SSB runs
between 6 8 % vs 11 and 13% on XP Pro
Config is XFXForce 680ilt
Do the F8 boot time option to disable driver signing requirement to get VAC to
run.
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: David Beumer W0DHB [mailto:d...@w0dhb.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 7:43 PM
To: Neal Campbell
Cc: Tim Ellison; Paul20; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Running
OK, I give up fighting Vista. It will only allow me to do things with the
Flex3000 that can be done on most any radio. I'm building a Quad core to the
specs on Knowledge Base for complete dedication to this radio. Which
version of XP is the absolute best match for this radio? Also, 32 bit or
You do not want to use 64-bit XP. The 64-bit support is not that mature. Any
of the 32-bit flavors of XP will work fine.
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of brahman...@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 05,
Wow is right. It is hard to understand just how impressive 40F really
is. 40G sounds the most impressive but to the trained ear and tools, 40
F is amazing. The Flex 5000 is utterly coherent through the
oscillators. It is two different DDS's that are synchronized by a built
in system which
/
Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage:
http://www.flex-radio.com/
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4054 (20090505) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__ Information from
Or put the system in permanent Test Mode.
At the Command Prompt.
bcdedit /set TESTSIGNING on
As per their instructions, VAC has a Test signing, not quite as good
as full driver signing, but works.. Then try installing again.
73,
Dudley
WA5QPZ
Tim Ellison wrote:
Do the F8 boot
Jim:
We can do this right now with a software receiver. We need to make the
oscillators coherent in the same way we have done (in software). So
this will be usable by SDR-1000 and Flex3000 owners. Good idea.
I do not agree that the algorithm you suggest is the correct one but it
will be
Contact me,
Phil K3TUF
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
Knowledge Base:
You idea is a good one. Period. That is all you should take away from
my remarks. I had not even begun to think of doing coherent processing
with the software receivers except to suck off interfering sidebands
from other signals in our passband. Thank you. John lovingly calls it
the Bob
Frank mentioned one person who had done some phasing experiments. I
would also like to mention Alex Shovkoplyas, VE3NEA who has done a
really neat version. I intend to steal his user interface idea
completely. It makes both mathematical and user sense.
Bob
I had the good fortune to do
Perhaps what we need is adaptive diversity reception.
:)
Phil Harman wrote:
My results of using the system was inconclusive. What I found was that
strong local signals could be nulled completely. However, on DX stations
it was very difficult to get any form of null or enhancement. When
My impression is you need more than a single pair of antenna choices.
I spent a lot of time trying to seperate WWVH and WWVB from FL using 2
verticals that were endfire to the E/W. I think something like a triangle
feeding 2 els against one, or 3 x 2el pairs may be a better topology
73
Can someone provide me a hyper-link to an fcc.gov webpage that specifically
provides this new ruling, or even send me a PDF copy of this new ruling? I
have looked all over the place, and the last official RO for part 97 that I
found was dated October 4, 2006.
73,
Mike
W5CUL
-Original
I am puzzled by the high number of Page faults I see when I monitor
PowerSDR in WinXP-Pro SP3 (32 bit). There seem to be around 2600 of
them a second continues. The total count advances by that same amount.
The radio Flex5000
PowerSDR v1.18.0
Driver 3.4.0.5254 (48Khz, 512 buffer, Safe Mode
I don't believe it's a ruling, per se. When Riley Hollingsworth was the
enforcement guru, he made several statements saying that to use excessive
bandwidth was not in the spirit of the Amateur Radio rules. A few years ago
there were several petitions to Regulate by Bandwidth that died for
32 matches
Mail list logo
